skip to main content
10.1145/3544999.3552322acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Simulator-Based Study of the Response Time and Defensive Behavior of Drivers in Unexpected Dangers at an Intersection

Published:17 September 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Intersection traffic accidents account for a substantial percentage of all traffic accidents, and they may lead to a high rate of fatalities. In this study, we aim to determine drivers’ responses when faced with unexpected dangers by obtaining data on drivers’ behavioral characteristics. We explored how drivers respond to intersection dangers in a simulated environment. Data including reaction times, vehicle data, occurrence of accidents, and ways to avoid accidents of 155 participants were analyzed. The results revealed a significant difference in steering angle, and speed between men and women, as well as in brake reaction time between 20s and 40s. A significant difference was observed in perception time, and brake reaction time depending on the occurrence of accidents. The findings of this study are expected to be used for predicting the reaction times and vehicle data, and determining the causes of traffic accidents.

References

  1. ISO 15007-1 (2014). Road vehicles—Measurement of driver visual behaviour with respect to transport information and control systems-Part 1: Definitions and parameters.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. NHTSA (2009). Traffic safety facts 2008. DOT HS 811 170. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Available at http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811170.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Passenger Vehicle Occupants (n.d.). Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. https://www.iihs.org/topics/fatality-statistics/detail/passenger-vehicle-occupants#crash-types.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kelley, M. E., Talton, J. W., Weaver, A. A., Usoro, A. O., Barnard, E. R., & Miller, A. N. (2019). Associations between upper extremity injury patterns in side impact motor vehicle collisions with occupant and crash characteristics. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 122, 1–7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Lee, M., Kim, S., Kim, J, & Yang, J. H. (2022). Simulator study on the response time and defensive behavior of drivers in a cut-in situation. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 23(3), 817-827.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Recarte, M. A., & Nunes, L. M. (2003). Mental workload while driving: Effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.9.2.119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Society of Automotive Engineers (2015). Operational definitions of driving performance measures and statistics. https://doi.org/10.4271/J2944_201506Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Olson, P. L., & Sivak, M. (1986). Perception-response time to unexpected roadway hazards. Human Factors, 28(1), 91–96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Donmez, B., Boyle, L. N., & Lee, J. D. (2007). Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39(3), 581–590.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Johansson, G., & Rumar, K. (1971). Drivers' brake reaction times. Human Factors, 13(1), 23–27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. D'Addario, P., & Donmez, B. (2019). The effect of cognitive distraction on perception-response time to unexpected abrupt and gradually onset roadway hazards. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 127, 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.03.003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Chai, M. (2019). Drowsiness monitoring based on steering wheel status. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 66, 95–103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Vollrath, M., & Fischer, J. (2017). When does alcohol hurt? A driving simulator study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 109, 89–98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    AutomotiveUI '22: Adjunct Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
    September 2022
    225 pages
    ISBN:9781450394284
    DOI:10.1145/3544999

    Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 17 September 2022

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Work in Progress
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate248of566submissions,44%

    Upcoming Conference

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format