skip to main content
10.1145/3548606.3563549acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Poster: An Analysis of Privacy Features in 'Expert-Approved' Kids' Apps

Published:07 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

During the course of the past decade, children have become avid consumers of digital media through mobile devices. The industry for children's mobile applications is booming and marketplaces offer categories of apps aimed specifically at children. In this study, we perform a mixed-methods privacy analysis of 137 'expert-approved' children's apps from the Google Play Store. Our findings show that these apps do not sufficiently support children to exercise their privacy rights, whilst simultaneously making use of libraries and data trackers which may collect and share sensitive user data.

References

  1. 2020. Age appropriate design: a code of practice for online services. https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/key-data-protection-themes/age-appropriate-design-a-code-of-practice-for-online-services-2-1.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Vincent Ang and Lwin Khin Shar. 2021. COVID-19 One Year on--Security and Privacy Review of Contact Tracing Mobile Apps. IEEE Pervasive Computing, Vol. 20, 4 (2021), 61--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Reuben Binns, Ulrik Lyngs, Max Van Kleek, Jun Zhao, Timothy Libert, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2018. Third party tracking in the mobile ecosystem. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science. ACM, 23--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Great Britain. 2018. Children and parents: Media use and attitudes report 2019. Ofcom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2014. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jon D Elhai, Robert D Dvorak, Jason C Levine, and Brian J Hall. 2017. Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology. Journal of affective disorders, Vol. 207 (2017), 251--259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Beeban Kidron, Alexandra Evans, Jenny Afia, Joanna R Adler, Henrietta Bowden-Jones, Liam Hackett, Anisha Juj, Andrew K Przybylski, Anghrarad Rudkin, and Young Scot. 2018. Disrupted childhood: the cost of persuasive design. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Konrad Kollnig, Pierre Dewitte, Max Van Kleek, Ge Wang, Daniel Omeiza, Helena Webb, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2021. A Fait Accompli? An Empirical Study into the Absence of Consent to Third-Party Tracking in Android Apps. 181--196. https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2021/presentation/kollnigGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hyuk Lee, Min Jae Seo, and Tae Young Choi. 2016. The effect of home-based daily journal writing in Korean adolescents with smartphone addiction. Journal of Korean medical science, Vol. 31, 5 (2016), 764--769.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jialiu Lin. 2013. Understanding and capturing people's mobile app privacy preferences. Technical Report. CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIV PITTSBURGH PA SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Minxing Liu, Haoyu Wang, Yao Guo, and Jason Hong. 2016. Identifying and analyzing the privacy of apps for kids. In Proceedings of the 17th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications. 105--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sonia Livingstone, Julia Davidson, Joanne Bryce, Saqba Batool, Ciaran Haughton, and Anulekha Nandi. 2017. Children's online activities, risks and safety: a literature review by the UKCCIS evidence group. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ofcom. 2018. Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Google Play. 2022. Expert approved apps. https://play.google.com/intl/en-GB_ALL/console/about/programs/teacherapproved.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Pamela Wisniewski, Arup Kumar Ghosh, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M Carroll. 2017. Parental Control vs. Teen Self-Regulation: Is there a middle ground for mobile online safety?. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 51--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Poster: An Analysis of Privacy Features in 'Expert-Approved' Kids' Apps

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CCS '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
      November 2022
      3598 pages
      ISBN:9781450394505
      DOI:10.1145/3548606

      Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 November 2022

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,261of6,999submissions,18%

      Upcoming Conference

      CCS '24
      ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
      October 14 - 18, 2024
      Salt Lake City , UT , USA
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)88
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader