skip to main content
research-article

"We Gather Together We Collaborate Together": Exploring the Challenges and Strategies of Chinese Lesbian and Bisexual Women's Online Communities on Weibo

Published:11 November 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In China, lesbian and bisexual women face intense stigma and difficulties developing relationships with each other. Although prior research has shown that online communities help LGBT people connect and exchange social support, few studies have explored the challenges Chinese lesbian and bisexual women face when initiating, growing, and sustaining such communities, in an atmosphere of platform censorship of LGBT-related content and intense discrimination from non-LGBT people. To address this gap, we interviewed 40 Weibo users in China, four bloggers and 36 followers of their blogs, who self-identified as lesbian or bisexual women. We found that a key technique these bloggers used to initiate their online communities was helping followers publish posts seeking support, sharing personal experiences, and seeking offline relationships. Then, their followers built relationships with bloggers by journaling their daily experiences as lesbian or bisexual women via private-messaging channels. As the communities' members grew more attached to them, bloggers and their followers began to work together to protect themselves from external threats, including Weibo's censorship and non-LGBT+ infiltrators' harassment. However, such attachment to the communities sometimes might lead to conflicts within them, which in turn prompted many members to leave, raising questions about the communities' long-term prospects. Our findings foreground important design considerations for those seeking to help lesbian and bisexual women in China and other discriminatory environments to develop safe online communities.

References

  1. Precious Adesina. 2019. Weibo is removing content with the #les hashtag. https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2019/04/15/weibo-bans-lesbian-hashtag/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Elif Varol Altay and Bilal Alatas. 2018. Detection of cyberbullying in social networks using machine learning methods. In 2018 International Congress on Big Data, Deep Learning and Fighting Cyber Terrorism (IBIGDELFT). IEEE, 87--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Nazanin Andalibi and Andrea Forte. 2018. Responding to sensitive disclosures on social media: A decision-making framework. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Vol. 25, 6 (2018), 1--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Paul Angelo and Dominic Bocci. 2021. The Changing Landscape of Global LGBTQ Rights. https://www.cfr.org/article/changing-landscape-global-lgbtq-rightsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Zahra Ashktorab and Jessica Vitak. 2016. Designing cyberbullying mitigation and prevention solutions through participatory design with teenagers. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3895--3905.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. John Balzano. 2007. Toward a Gay-Friendly China: Legal Implications of Transition for Gays and Lesbians. Law & Sexuality: Rev. Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Legal Issues , Vol. 16 (2007), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kristen Barta and Nazanin Andalibi. 2021. Constructing Authenticity on TikTok: Social Norms and Social Support on the" Fun" Platform. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Karine Barzilai-Nahon. 2008. Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: A framework for exploring information control. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, Vol. 59, 9 (2008), 1493--1512.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Amit Baumel, Christoph U Correll, and Michael Birnbaum. 2016. Adaptation of a peer based online emotional support program as an adjunct to treatment for people with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Internet interventions , Vol. 4 (2016), 35--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lindsay Blackwell, Jean Hardy, Tawfiq Ammari, Tiffany Veinot, Cliff Lampe, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2016. LGBT parents and social media: Advocacy, privacy, and disclosure during shifting social movements. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 610--622.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Anita L Blanchard and M Lynne Markus. 2004. The experienced" sense" of a virtual community: Characteristics and processes. ACM Sigmis Database: the database for advances in information systems, Vol. 35, 1 (2004), 64--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Talha Burki. 2017. Health and rights challenges for China's LGBT community. The Lancet, Vol. 389, 10076 (2017), 1286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Nectar Gan Business and CNN Yong Xiong. [n.d.]. WeChat deletes dozens of university LGBT accounts in China. https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/07/business/china-lgbt-wechat-censorship-intl-hnk/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jin Cao and Lei Guo. 2016. Chinese "Tongzhi" community, civil society, and online activism. Communication and the Public , Vol. 1, 4 (2016), 504--508.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Qiang Cao, Xiaowei Yang, Jieqi Yu, and Christopher Palow. 2014. Uncovering large groups of active malicious accounts in online social networks. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 477--488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Matthew Carrasco and Andruid Kerne. 2018. Queer visibility: Supporting LGBT selective visibility on social media. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Michael Chao-Sheng Chang et al. 2011. Social Relationships Development In Virtual Community: A Life Cycle Approach.. In PACIS. Citeseer, 36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jean Chong. 2017. A brief perspective on the LBT movement in China. https://outrightinternational.org/content/brief-perspective-lbt-movement-chinaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pizza Ka-Yee Chow and Sheung-Tak Cheng. 2010. Shame, internalized heterosexism, lesbian identity, and coming out to others: A comparative study of lesbians in mainland China and Hong Kong. Journal of counseling psychology , Vol. 57, 1 (Jan 2010), 92--104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017930Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Michael A Devito, Ashley Marie Walker, Jeremy Birnholtz, Kathryn Ringland, Kathryn Macapagal, Ashley Kraus, Sean Munson, Calvin Liang, and Herman Saksono. 2019. Social technologies for digital wellbeing among marginalized communities. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 449--454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Michael Ann DeVito, Ashley Marie Walker, and Julia R Fernandez. 2021. Values (Mis) alignment: Exploring Tensions Between Platform and LGBTQ Community Design Values. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Bryan Dosono and Bryan Semaan. 2019. Moderation practices as emotional labor in sustaining online communities: The case of AAPI identity work on Reddit. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Stefanie Duguay. 2019. "There's no one new around you": Queer women's experiences of scarcity in geospatial partner-seeking on Tinder. In The Geographies of Digital Sexuality. Springer, 93--114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Stefanie Duguay, Jean Burgess, and Nicolas Suzor. 2020. Queer women's experiences of patchwork platform governance on Tinder, Instagram, and Vine. Convergence, Vol. 26, 2 (2020), 237--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Brianna Dym, Jed R Brubaker, Casey Fiesler, and Bryan Semaan. 2019. " Coming Out Okay" Community Narratives for LGBTQ Identity Recovery Work. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Hannah Ellis-Petersen. 2016. China bans depictions of gay people on television. The Guardian (Mar 2016). https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2016/mar/04/china-bans-gay-people-television-clampdown-xi-jinping-censorshipGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jesse Fox and Rachel Ralston. 2016. Queer identity online: Informal learning and teaching experiences of LGBTQ individuals on social media. Computers in Human Behavior , Vol. 65 (2016), 635--642.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jesse Fox and Katie M Warber. 2015. Queer identity management and political self-expression on social networking sites: A co-cultural approach to the spiral of silence. Journal of Communication , Vol. 65, 1 (2015), 79--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Rik Glauert. 2019. Is China's Weibo cracking down on LGBTI content again? https://www.gaystarnews.com/article/is-chinas-weibo-cracking-down-on-lgbti-content-again/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. James Griffiths. 2019. Can you be gay online in China? Social media companies aren't sure | CNN Business. https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/17/tech/weibo-china-censorship-lgbt-intl/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Oliver L Haimson, Justin Buss, Zu Weinger, Denny L Starks, Dykee Gorrell, and Briar Sweetbriar Baron. 2020. Trans Time: Safety, Privacy, and Content Warnings on a Transgender-Specific Social Media Site. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, CSCW2 (2020), 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Oliver L Haimson, Avery Dame-Griff, Elias Capello, and Zahari Richter. 2021. Tumblr was a trans technology: the meaning, importance, history, and future of trans technologies. Feminist Media Studies , Vol. 21, 3 (2021), 345--361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Xi Han, Wenting Han, Jiabin Qu, Bei Li, and Qinghua Zhu. 2019. What happens online stays online?--Social media dependency, online support behavior and offline effects for LGBT. Computers in Human Behavior , Vol. 93 (2019), 91--98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Benjamin Hanckel, Son Vivienne, Paul Byron, Brady Robards, and Brendan Churchill. 2019. "That's not necessarily for them': LGBTIQ young people, social media platform affordances and identity curation. Media, Culture & Society , Vol. 41, 8 (2019), 1261--1278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Blake W Hawkins and Oliver Haimson. 2018. Building an online community of care: Tumblr use by transgender individuals. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT. 75--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Terri He. 2007. Cyberqueers in Taiwan: Locating histories of the margins. Journal of International Women's Studies , Vol. 8, 2 (2007), 55--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Javier C. Hernández and Zoe Mou. 2018. "I Am Gay, Not a Pervert': Furor in China as Sina Weibo Bans Gay Content. The New York Times (Apr 2018). https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/15/world/asia/china-gay-ban-sina-weibo-.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Alexa Hiebert and Kathy Kortes-Miller. 2021. Finding home in online community: exploring TikTok as a support for gender and sexual minority youth throughout COVID-19. Journal of LGBT Youth (2021), 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Timothy Hildebrandt. 2012. Development and division: The effect of transnational linkages and local politics on LGBT activism in China. Journal of Contemporary China , Vol. 21, 77 (2012), 845--862.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Chaya Hiruncharoenvate, Wesley Smith, W Keith Edwards, and Eric Gilbert. 2016. Popup Networks: Creating Decentralized Social Media on Top of Commodity Wireless Routers. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work. 149--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Michael A Hogg and Dominic Abrams. 1988. Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. Taylor & Frances/Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Community Marketing & Insights. 2014. The LGBT Market in China: Exploring the Opportunities. https://communitymarketinginc.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/CMI_Presentation_LGBT_China_07Aug2014.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Alicia Iriberri and Gondy Leroy. 2009. A life-cycle perspective on online community success. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) , Vol. 41, 2 (2009), 1--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Yuqiao Ji. 2019. Shutdown of online lesbian community on China's twitter-like Sina Weibo sparks protest. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/201904/1145991.shtmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Nadia Karizat, Dan Delmonaco, Motahhare Eslami, and Nazanin Andalibi. 2021. Algorithmic folk theories and identity: How TikTok users co-produce Knowledge of identity and engage in algorithmic resistance. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Dhruv Khullar and M.D. 2018. Stigma Against Gay People Can Be Deadly. The New York Times (Oct 2018). https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/09/well/live/gay-lesbian-lgbt-health-stigma-laws.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Yubo Kou, Yong Ming Kow, and Xinning Gui. 2017. Resisting the censorship infrastructure in China. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Robert E Kraut and Paul Resnick. 2012. Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design. Mit Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Chow S Lam, Hector Tsang, Fong Chan, and Patrick W Corrigan. 2006. Chinese and American perspectives on stigma. Rehabilitation Education , Vol. 20, 4 (2006), 269--279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Erick Laurent. 2005. Sexuality and human rights: an Asian perspective. Journal of Homosexuality , Vol. 48, 3--4 (2005), 163--225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Alex Leavitt and John J Robinson. 2017. The role of information visibility in network gatekeeping: Information aggregation on Reddit during crisis events. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. 1246--1261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Ming Li. 2017. Social Networks and Lesbians' Mental Health: A Study of a Lesbian Community in Northeast China. The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Ruohan Li. 2018. The secret of internet celebrities: A qualitative study of online opinion leaders on Weibo. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Leanna Lucero. 2017. Safe spaces in online places: Social media and LGBTQ youth. Multicultural Education Review , Vol. 9, 2 (2017), 117--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Toby Miles-Johnson and Yurong Wang. 2018. "Hidden identities': perceptions of sexual identity in Beijing. The British journal of sociology , Vol. 69, 2 (2018), 323--351.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Geeta Moni. 2021. Discrimination as WeChat deletes LGBTQIA accounts in China. https://www.hhrjournal.org/2021/08/discrimination-as-wechat-deletes-lgbtqia-accounts-in-china/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Fayika Farhat Nova, Michael Ann DeVito, Pratyasha Saha, Kazi Shohanur Rashid, Shashwata Roy Turzo, Sadia Afrin, and Shion Guha. 2021. " Facebook Promotes More Harassment" Social Media Ecosystem, Skill and Marginalized Hijra Identity in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Lorelli S Nowell, Jill M Norris, Deborah E White, and Nancy J Moules. 2017. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International journal of qualitative methods, Vol. 16, 1 (2017), 1609406917733847.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Office of the central Cyberspace Affairs Commission et al. 2021. The 46th China statistical report on internet development. 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. United Nations Development Programme. 2016. Being LGBTI in China: A National Survey on Social Attitudes Towards Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Gender Expression.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. ZhengJia Ren, Catherine Q Howe, and Wei Zhang. 2019. Maintaining "mianzi" and "lizi": Understanding the reasons for formality marriages between gay men and lesbians in China. Transcultural psychiatry , Vol. 56, 1 (2019), 213--232.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Esther Rothblum. 2010. Where is the "women's community"'Voices of lesbian, bisexual, and queer women and heterosexual sisters. Feminism & Psychology , Vol. 20, 4 (2010), 454--472.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Koustuv Saha, Sang Chan Kim, Manikanta D Reddy, Albert J Carter, Eva Sharma, Oliver L Haimson, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2019. The language of LGBTQ minority stress experiences on social media. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Pedro Sanches, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Asreen Rostami, and Barry Brown. 2020. Under Surveillance: Technology Practices of those Monitored by the State. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Stacy M Branham, and Foad Hamidi. 2018. Safe spaces and safe places: Unpacking technology-mediated experiences of safety and harm with transgender people. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Gareth Shaw and Xiaoling Zhang. 2018. Cyberspace and gay rights in a digital China: Queer documentary filmmaking under state censorship. China Information, Vol. 32, 2 (2018), 270--292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Irina Shklovski and Nalini Kotamraju. 2011. Online contribution practices in countries that engage in internet blocking and censorship. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1109--1118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Ellen Simpson and Bryan Semaan. 2021. For You, or For" You"? Everyday LGBTQ Encounters with TikTok. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, Vol. 4, CSCW3 (2021), 1--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Susan Stryker. 2008. Transgender history, homonormativity, and disciplinarity. Radical History Review , Vol. 2008, 100 (2008), 145--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Jonathan Sullivan. 2012. A tale of two microblogs in China. Media, culture & society , Vol. 34, 6 (2012), 773--783.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Yuge Sun. 2021. A Friendly Zone or Malicious One?. In 2021 International Conference on Public Relations and Social Sciences (ICPRSS 2021). Atlantis Press, 857--861.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Yu Sun and Vincent Guangsheng Huang. 2021. Embedded data activism: the institutionalization of a grassroots environmental data initiative in China. Chinese Journal of Communication (2021), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Harry C Triandis. 2018. Individualism and collectivism. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Ashley Marie Walker and Michael A DeVito. 2020. "'More gay'fits in better": Intracommunity Power Dynamics and Harms in Online LGBTQ Spaces. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Shuaishuai Wang et al. 2019a. Living with censorship: The political economy and cultural politics of Chinese gay dating apps. Ph.D. Dissertation. Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Yuanyuan Wang, Zhishan Hu, Ke Peng, Joanne Rechdan, Yuan Yang, Lijuan Wu, Ying Xin, Jiahui Lin, Zhizhou Duan, Xuequan Zhu, et al. 2020. Mapping out a spectrum of the Chinese public's discrimination toward the LGBT community: results from a national survey. BMC Public Health , Vol. 20 (2020), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Yuanyuan Wang, Zhishan Hu, Ke Peng, Ying Xin, Yuan Yang, Jack Drescher, and Runsen Chen. 2019b. Discrimination against LGBT populations in China. The Lancet Public Health , Vol. 4, 9 (2019), e440--e441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Phillip Wegner. 2002. Imaginary Communities. University of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2019. Volunteer moderators in twitch micro communities: How they get involved, the roles they play, and the emotional labor they experience. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. William Yang. 2021. China feminists face clampdown, closure of online accounts. https://www.dw.com/en/china-feminism-free-speech/a-57277438Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Yifan Yang. 2019. Bargaining with the State: The empowerment of Chinese sexual minorities/LGBT in the social media era. Journal of Contemporary China , Vol. 28, 118 (2019), 662--677.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. Daphna Yeshua-Katz. 2015. Online stigma resistance in the pro-ana community. Qualitative health research , Vol. 25, 10 (2015), 1347--1358.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Fouzia Younas, Mustafa Naseem, and Maryam Mustafa. 2020. Patriarchy and social media: Women only facebook groups as safe spaces for support seeking in Pakistan. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Quan Zheng, Ying Guo, Zhen Wang, Frank Andrasik, Ziyi Kuang, Junyi Li, Sheng Xu, and Xiangen Hu. 2022. Exploring Weibo users' attitudes toward lesbians and gays in Mainland China: A natural language processing and machine learning approach. Computers in Human Behavior , Vol. 127 (2022), 107021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Huiquan Zhou and Quanxiao Pan. 2016. Information, community, and action on Sina-Weibo: How Chinese philanthropic NGOs use social media. Voluntas: International journal of voluntary and nonprofit organizations, Vol. 27, 5 (2016), 2433--2457. ioGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. "We Gather Together We Collaborate Together": Exploring the Challenges and Strategies of Chinese Lesbian and Bisexual Women's Online Communities on Weibo

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 6, Issue CSCW2
      CSCW
      November 2022
      8205 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3571154
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 November 2022
      Published in pacmhci Volume 6, Issue CSCW2

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader