skip to main content
research-article

Engaging with Under-Resourced Communities for User Research through Self-Authored Videos

Published:11 November 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The conventional 'participant-as-informant' model of user research has recently been challenged by approaches that advocate for participants to have a greater authorial control over narratives that portray their lived experiences. This is particularly important for addressing relationships of power and representation. Informed by narrative approaches in social work, we report on a study exploring the use of self-authored videos captured by 16 participants from under-resourced communities. Participants portrayed their mundane life experiences in a form of a video biography. Co-analysis of resulting videos showed that video biographies were used for: authentic representation of daily routines and life stories; portrayal of DIY identities; and promoting living well. Findings show how the self-authored biographies afforded participants a vehicle for challenging cultural stereotypes often associated with the research population. We further demonstrate the value of video-based approaches in user research for illuminating mundane life through rich autobiographical narratives.

References

  1. Asam Almohamed and Dhaval Vyas. 2019. Rebuilding social capital in refugees and asylum seekers. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 26, 6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3364996Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2015. Humanistic HCI. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 8, 4: 1--185. https://doi.org/10.2200/s00664ed1v01y201508hci031Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Tom Bartindale, Delvin Varghese, Guy Schofeld, and Miki Tsukamoto. 2019. Our story: Addressing challenges in development contexts for sustainable participatory video. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300667Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Jill Sinclair Bell. 2002. Narrative Inquiry: More Than Just Telling Stories. TESOL Quarterly 36, 2: 207. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588331Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Arthur Asa Berger. 1997. Narratives in popular culture, media, and everyday life. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2: 77--101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Pam Briggs, Mark Blythe, John Vines, Stephen Lindsay, Paul Dunphy, James Nicholson, David Green, Jim Kitson, Andrew Monk, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Invisible design: Exploring insights and ideas through ambiguous film scenarios. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS '12, 534--543. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318036Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jerome Bruner. 1990. Acts of Meaning: Four Lectures on Mind and Culture. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacob Buur, Euan Fraser, Soila Oinonen, and Max Rolfstam. 2010. Ethnographic video as design specs. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 49--56. https://doi.org/10.1145/1952222.1952235Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jacob Buur and Astrid Soendergaard. 2000. Video card game: An augmented environment for user centred design discussions. In Proceedings of DARE 2000 on Designing Augmented Reality Environments, 63--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Tara Capel, Dhaval Vyas, and Margot Brereton. 2017. Women in Crisis Situations: Empowering and Supporting Women Through ICTs. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--67684--5_5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Tara Capel, Jennyfer Lawrence Taylor, and Dhaval Vyas. 2016. Using self-reported experiences to explore the issues of women in crisis situations. In Proceedings of the 28th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, OzCHI 2016, 483--488. https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3010962Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Tara Capel, Dhaval Vyas, and Margot Brereton. 2017. Women in Crisis Situations: Empowering and Supporting Women Through ICTs. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 64--84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--67684--5_5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. D Jean Clandinin. 2006. Narrative inquiry: A methodology for studying lived experience. In Research Studies in Music Education, 44--54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X060270010301Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Rachel Clarke, Peter Wright, Madeline Balaam, and John McCarthy. 2013. Digital portraits: Photo-sharing after domestic violence. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 2517--2526. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481348Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. F. Michael Connelly and D. Jean Clandinin. 1990. Stories of Experience and Narrative Inquiry. Educational Researcher 19, 5: 2. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176100Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Andy Crabtree, Terry Hemmings, and Tom Rodden. 2002. Pattern-based support for interactive design in domestic settings. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, DIS, 265--275. https://doi.org/10.1145/778712.778749Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Sebastien Cuendet, Indrani Medhi, Kalika Bali, and Edward Cutrell. 2013. VideoKheti: Making video content accessible to low-literate and novice users. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 2833--2842. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481392Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Christopher A. Le Dantec and W. Keith Edwards. 2008. Designs on dignity: Perceptions of technology among the homeless. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 627--636. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357155Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hilary Davis, Jenny Waycott, and Shou Zhou. 2015. Beyond YouTube. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction on - OzCHI '15: 579--587. https://doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838771Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Tawanna R Dillahunt. 2014. Fostering Social Capital in Economically Distressed Communities. CHI 2014. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 531--540. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557123Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '16: 656--671. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901861Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sarah Fox and Christopher Le Dantec. 2014. Community Historians: Scaffolding Community Engagement Through Culture and Heritage. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: 785--794.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Heather Fraser. 2004. Doing Narrative Research. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice 3, 2: 179--201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325004043383Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. David M. Frohlich, Dorothy Rachovides, Kiriaki Riga, Eran Edirisinghe, Dhammike Wickramanayaka, Ramnath Bhat, Maxine Frank, Matt Jones, Will Harwood, Eran Edirisinghe, Dhammike Wickramanayaka, Matt Jones, and Will Harwood. 2009. StoryBank: Mobile Digital Storytelling in a Development Context. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI 09: 1761. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518972Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Rikin Gandhi, Rajesh Veeraraghavan, Kentaro Toyama, and Vanaja Ramprasad. 2007. Digital green: Participatory video for agricultural extension. In 2007 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, ICTD 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTD.2007.4937388Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Bill Gaver, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Design: Cultural probes. interactions 6, 1: 21--29. https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. David Philip Green, Simon Bowen, Jonathan Hook, and Peter Wright. 2017. Enabling polyvocality in interactive documentaries through "structural participation." In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 6317--6329. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025606Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. David Philip Green, Simon J. Bowen, Chris Newell, Guy Schofield, Tom Bartindale, Clara Crivellaro, Alia Sheikh, Peter Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2015. Beyond participatory production: Digitally supporting grassroots documentary. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 3157--3166. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702203Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Thilina Halloluwa, Hakim Usoof, and Dhaval Vyas. 2018. Sociocultural practices that make microfinance work: A case study from Sri Lanka. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274334Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Christina N. Harrington, Katya Borgos-Rodriguez, and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. Engaging Low-Income African American Older Adults in Health Discussions through Community-based Design Workshops. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19, 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300823Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Christian Heath, Jon Hindmarsh, and Paul Luff. 2017. Video in Qualitative Research: Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526435385Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Yasamin Heshmat, Carman Neustaedter, and Brendan Debrincat. 2017. The autobiographical design and long term usage of an always-on video recording system for the home. In DIS 2017 - Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 675--687. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064759Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Gagan Jindal and Yuting Liao. 2018. Living with HIV/AIDS: Exploring Vloggers' Narratives on YouTube. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Media and Society (SMSociety '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 320--324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3217804.3217937Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Naveena Karusala, Isaac Holeman, and Richard Anderson. 2019. Engaging identity, assets, and constraints in designing for resilience. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW: 1--23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359315Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Neha Kumar, Trevor Perrier, Michelle Desmond, Kiersten Israel-Ballard, Vikrant Kumar, Sudip Mahapatra, Anil Mishra, Shreya Agarwal, Rikin Gandhi, Pallavi Lal, and Richard Anderson. 2015. Projecting Health: Community-Led Video Education for Maternal Health. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2737856.2738023Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Joe Lambert. 2012. Digital Storytelling: Capturing Lives, Creating Community (Digital Imaging and Computer Vision).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Caroline Lenette, Mark Brough, Robert D. Schweitzer, Ignacio Correa-Velez, Kate Murray, and Lyn Vromans. 2019. "Better than a pill': digital storytelling as a narrative process for refugee women. Media Practice and Education 20, 1: 67--86. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2018.1464740Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Caroline Lenette, Leonie Cox, and Mark Brough. 2015. Digital storytelling as a social work tool: Learning from ethnographic research with women from refugee backgrounds. British Journal of Social Work 45, 3: 988--1005. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct184Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Wendy E. Mackay, Anne V. Ratzer, and Paul Janecek. 2000. Video artifacts for design. In Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems processes, practices, methods, and techniques - DIS '00, 72--82. https://doi.org/10.1145/347642.347666Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Clara Mancini, Yvonne Rogers, Arosha K. Bandara, Tony Coe, Lukasz Jedrzejczyk, Adam N. Joinson, Blaine A. Price, Keerthi Thomas, and Bashar Nuseibeh. 2010. ContraVision: Exploring users' reactions to futuristic technology. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 153--162. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753350Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. John; McCarthy and Peter Wright. 2004. Technology as Experience. MIT Press. Retrieved September 5, 2020 from https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=bTr_rBl4f-YC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&ots=v5dA6XV4aD&sig=5XCZr0nY7--11GwhikUYpG6LDNP0#v=onepage&q&f=falseGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Carrie Merscham. 2000. Restorying Trauma with Narrative Therapy: Using the Phantom Family. The Family Journal 8, 3: 282--286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480700083013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Doenja Oogjes and Ron Wakkary. 2017. Videos of things: Speculating on, anticipating and synthesizing technological mediations. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 4489--4500. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025748Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Dennis K. Orthner, Hinckley Jones-Sanpei, and Sabrina Williamson. 2004. The Resilience and Strengths of Low-Income Families. Family Relations 53, 159--167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022--2445.2004.00006.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Lucy Pei and Bonnie A. Nardi. 2019. We did it right, but it was still wrong: Toward assets-based design. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3310434Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Sarah Pink. 2008. Walking with video. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860701657142 22, 3: 240--252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860701657142Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Sarah Pink. 2008. An urban tour: The sensory sociality of ethnographic place-making. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1466138108089467 9, 2: 175--196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108089467Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Sarah Pink. 2012. Doing Sensory Ethnography. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249383Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Sarah Pink. 2013. Doing visual ethnography, 3rd edition. 238. Retrieved December 14, 2019 from https://melvyl.worldcat.org/title/doing-visual-ethnography/oclc/854617829&referer=brief_resultsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Sarah Pink and Kerstin Leder Mackley. 2014. Re-enactment methodologies for everyday life research: art therapy insights for video ethnography. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2014.887266 29, 2: 146--154. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2014.887266Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Bas Raijmakers, William W. Gaver, and Jon Bishay. 2006. Design documentaries: Inspiring Design Research Through Documentary Film. Proceeding in DIS '06 Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems: 229--238. https://doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142441Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Thomas Reitmaier, Nicola J. Bidwell, and Gary Marsden. 2011. Situating digital storytelling within African communities. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 69, 10: 658--668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.12.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Catherine Kohler Riessman. Divorce talk?: women and men make sense of personal relationships. Retrieved September 1, 2020 from https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/200566Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. J. Roberson and B. Nardi. 2010. Survival needs and social inclusion: Technology use among the homeless. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work: 445--448. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718993Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Yvonne Rogers and Gary Marsden. 2013. Does he take sugar? Interactions 20, 4: 48. https://doi.org/10.1145/2486227.2486238Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Stephen Snow, Dhaval Vyas, and Margot Brereton. 2015. When an eco-feedback system joins the family. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 19, 5--6: 929--940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-015-0839-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Sarah M. Steelman. 2016. Externalizing Identities: An Integration of Narrative Therapy and Queer Theory. Journal of Family Psychotherapy 27, 1: 79--84. https://doi.org/10.1080/08975353.2016.1136549Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Delvin Varghese, Patrick Olivier, and Tom Bartindale. 2020. Towards Participatory Video 2.0. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376694Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. John Vines, Paul Dunphy, and Andrew Monk. 2014. Pay or Delay: The Role of Technology when Managing a Low Income. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 501--510. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556961Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. John Vines, Roisin McNaney, Rachel Clarke, Stephen Lindsay, John McCarthy, Steve Howard, Mario Romero, and Jayne Wallace. 2013. Designing For- and With- Vulnerable People. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 3231--3234. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2479654Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Dhaval Vyas and Tawanna Dillahunt. 2017. Everyday resilience: Supporting resilient strategies among low-socioeconomic-status communities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW: 1--21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134740Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Dhaval Vyas, Stephen Snow, and Miranda Mallett. 2015. More than just Food. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction on - OzCHI '15, 662--666. https://doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838787Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Deborah Warr, Jenny Waycott, Marilys Guillemin, and Susan Cox. 2016. Ethical issues in visual research and the value of stories from the field. In Ethics and Visual Research Methods: Theory, Methodology, and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, 1--16. https://doi.org/10.1057/978--1--137--54305--9_1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Jenny Waycott and Hilary Davis. 2017. Sharing the Housebound Experience through Visual Storytelling. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition - C&C '17, 2--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059454.3059487Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Jenny Waycott, Hilary Davis, Deborah Warr, Fran Edmonds, and Gretel Taylor. 2016. Co-constructing Meaning and Negotiating Participation: Ethical Tensions when ?Giving Voice' through Digital Storytelling. Interacting with Computers 29, 2: 237--247. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iww025Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Jenny Waycott, Marilys Guillemin, Deborah Joy Warr, Susan Cox, Sarah Drew, and Catherine Howell. 2015. Re/formulating Ethical Issues for Visual Research Methods. Visual Methodologies 3, 2: 4--15. https://doi.org/10.7331/VM.V3I2.64Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Jenny Waycott, Frank Vetere, Sonja Pedell, Amee Morgans, Elizabeth Ozanne, and Lars Kulik. 2016. Not For Me. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 745--757. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858458Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Jill Palzkill Woelfer and David G. Hendry. 2010. Homeless young people's experiences with information systems: Life and work in a community technology center. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10): 1291--1300. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753520Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Peter Wright and John McCarthy. 2010. Experience-Centered Design: Designers, Users, and Communities in Dialogue. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 3, 1: 1--123. https://doi.org/10.2200/s00229ed1v01y201003hci009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. How to Fix a Broken Tongue. We speak things into existence and use? | by Natalie S. Burke | Medium. Retrieved August 17, 2020 from https://medium.com/@natalie4health/how-to-fix-a-broken-tongue-cade93816addGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Work for the Dole. Retrieved from https://www.jobs.gov.au/work-doleGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Engaging with Under-Resourced Communities for User Research through Self-Authored Videos

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 6, Issue CSCW2
      CSCW
      November 2022
      8205 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3571154
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 November 2022
      Published in pacmhci Volume 6, Issue CSCW2

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)62
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader