skip to main content
10.1145/3562939.3565608acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvrstConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

VISTA: User-centered VR Training System for Effectively Deriving Characteristics of People with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Pervasive symptoms of people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), such as a lack of social and communication skills, are major challenges to be embraced in the workplace. Although much research has proposed VR training programs, their effectiveness is somewhat unclear, since they provide limited, one-sided interactions through fixed scenarios or do not sufficiently reflect the characteristics of people with ASD (e.g., preference for predictable interfaces, sensory issues). In this paper, we present VISTA, a VR-based interactive social skill training system for people with ASD. We ran a user study with 10 people with ASD and 10 neurotypical people to evaluate user experience in VR training and to examine the characteristics of people with ASD based on their physical responses generated by sensor data. The results showed that ASD participants were highly engaged with VISTA and improved self-efficacy after experiencing VISTA. The two groups showed significant differences in sensor signals as the task complexity increased, which demonstrates the importance of considering task complexity in eliciting the characteristics of people with ASD in VR training. Our findings not only extend findings (e.g., low ROI ratio, EDA increase) in previous studies but also provide new insights (e.g., high utterance rate, large variation of pupil diameter), broadening our quantitative understanding of people with ASD.

References

  1. Dane Acena and Guo Freeman. 2021. “In My Safe Space”: Social Support for LGBTQ Users in Social Virtual Reality. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Deeksha Adiani, Aaron Itzkovitz, Dayi Bian, Harrison Katz, Michael Breen, Spencer Hunt, Amy Swanson, Timothy J Vogus, Joshua Wade, and Nilanjan Sarkar. 2022. Career interview readiness in virtual reality (CIRVR): a platform for simulated interview training for autistic individuals and their employers. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 15, 1 (2022), 1–28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ali Adjorlu, Emil Rosenlund Høeg, Luca Mangano, and Stefania Serafin. 2017. Daily living skills training in virtual reality to help children with autism spectrum disorder in a real shopping scenario. In 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct). IEEE, 294–302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Zeeshan Akhtar and Tanaya Guha. 2019. Computational analysis of gaze behavior in autism during interaction with virtual agents. In ICASSP 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 1075–1079.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. The Autism Society Philippines (ASP). 2017. Barista Training for Adults with Autism. https://bit.ly/3zq0PsTGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. American Psychiatric Association 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Autism Spectrum Australia. 2022. Coffee anyone? - Aspect’s Central Coast receives funding for new education and employment program. https://bit.ly/3cEA7F3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Albert Bandura. 2012. On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of management 38, 1 (2012), 9–44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Esubalew Bekele, Joshua Wade, Dayi Bian, Jing Fan, Amy Swanson, Zachary Warren, and Nilanjan Sarkar. 2016. Multimodal adaptive social interaction in virtual environment (MASI-VR) for children with Autism spectrum disorders (ASD). In 2016 IEEE virtual reality (VR). IEEE, 121–130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Esubalew Bekele, Zhi Zheng, Amy Swanson, Julie Crittendon, Zachary Warren, and Nilanjan Sarkar. 2013. Understanding how adolescents with autism respond to facial expressions in virtual reality environments. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 19, 4(2013), 711–720.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Olga Bogdashina. 2016. Sensory perceptual issues in autism and asperger syndrome: different sensory experiences-different perceptual worlds. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lal Bozgeyikli, Evren Bozgeyikli, Andrew Raij, Redwan Alqasemi, Srinivas Katkoori, and Rajiv Dubey. 2017. Vocational rehabilitation of individuals with autism spectrum disorder with virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 10, 2 (2017), 1–25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lal Bozgeyikli, Andrew Raij, Srinivas Katkoori, and Redwan Alqasemi. 2017. A survey on virtual reality for individuals with autism spectrum disorder: design considerations. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 11, 2 (2017), 133–151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lal" Lila" Bozgeyikli, Evren Bozgeyikli, Srinivas Katkoori, Andrew Raij, and Redwan Alqasemi. 2018. Effects of virtual reality properties on user experience of individuals with autism. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 11, 4 (2018), 1–27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Vincent J Carbone, Leigh O’Brien, Emily J Sweeney-Kerwin, and Kristin M Albert. 2013. Teaching eye contact to children with autism: A conceptual analysis and single case study. Education and treatment of children 36, 2 (2013), 139–159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Yufang Cheng, Cheng-Li Huang, and Chung-Sung Yang. 2015. Using a 3D immersive virtual environment system to enhance social understanding and social skills for children with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 30, 4(2015), 222–236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. S Chrisilla, Tharun R Ragav, S Vidhusha, and A Kavitha. 2021. Investigating Cognitive Global Coordination in normal and autistic children using virtual reality environments–An EEG Study. In 2021 10th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER). IEEE, 1016–1019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jacob Cohen. 1988. The effect size. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (1988), 77–83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Daniel J Cox, Timothy Brown, Veerle Ross, Matthew Moncrief, Rose Schmitt, Gary Gaffney, and Ron Reeve. 2017. Can youth with autism spectrum disorder use virtual reality driving simulation training to evaluate and improve driving performance? An exploratory study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 47, 8 (2017), 2544–2555.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Chathuri Daluwatte, Judith H Miles, Shawn E Christ, David Q Beversdorf, T Nicole Takahashi, and Gang Yao. 2013. Atypical pupillary light reflex and heart rate variability in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 43, 8 (2013), 1910–1925.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Rosaria De Luca, Antonino Naro, Pia Valentina Colucci, Federica Pranio, Giuseppe Tardiolo, Luana Billeri, Maria Le Cause, Carmela De Domenico, Simona Portaro, Giuseppe Rao, 2021. Improvement of brain functional connectivity in autism spectrum disorder: an exploratory study on the potential use of virtual reality. Journal of Neural Transmission 128, 3 (2021), 371–380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Cédric Di Loreto, Jean-Rémy Chardonnet, Julien Ryard, and Alain Rousseau. 2018. Woah: A virtual reality work-at-height simulator. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 281–288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Renee R Dijkhuis, Tim Ziermans, Sophie van Rijn, Wouter Staal, and Hanna Swaab. 2019. Emotional arousal during social stress in young adults with autism: Insights from heart rate, heart rate variability and self-report. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 49, 6 (2019), 2524–2535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Empatica. 2021. E4 Wristband. Real-Time Physiological Data Streaming and Visualization. (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Noah Glaser and Matthew Schmidt. 2022. Systematic literature review of virtual reality intervention design patterns for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 38, 8(2022), 753–788.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Katherine O Gotham, Greg J Siegle, Gloria T Han, Andrew J Tomarken, Rachel N Crist, David M Simon, and James W Bodfish. 2018. Pupil response to social-emotional material is associated with rumination and depressive symptoms in adults with autism spectrum disorder. PloS one 13, 8 (2018), e0200340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Temple Grandin. 2002. Teaching tips for children and adults with autism. Fort Collins (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Javier Hernandez, Ivan Riobo, Agata Rozga, Gregory D Abowd, and Rosalind W Picard. 2014. Using electrodermal activity to recognize ease of engagement in children during social interactions. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. 307–317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Jorge Fernández Herrero and Gonzalo Lorenzo. 2020. An immersive virtual reality educational intervention on people with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) for the development of communication skills and problem solving. Education and Information Technologies 25, 3 (2020), 1689–1722.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Bogseon Hwang and Carolyn Hughes. 2000. The effects of social interactive training on early social communicative skills of children with autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 30, 4 (2000), 331–343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Seunggon Jeon, Seungwon Paik, Ungyeon Yang, Patrick C Shih, and Kyungsik Han. 2021. The More, the Better? Improving VR Firefighting Training System with Realistic Firefighter Tools as Controllers. Sensors 21, 21 (2021), 7193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Seung-Gon Jeon, Jaeho Han, Yonggeol Jo, and Kyungsik Han. 2019. Being more focused and engaged in firefighting training: Applying user-centered design to VR system development. In 25th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Weina Jin, Jianyu Fan, Diane Gromala, and Philippe Pasquier. 2018. Automatic prediction of cybersickness for virtual reality games. In 2018 IEEE Games, Entertainment, Media Conference (GEM). IEEE, 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Young-Hwan Jun, Yong-Hyeon Nam, Eona Kim, Myeng-Mo Yeon, and Min-Su Byeon. 2014. Vocational Training of Persons with Disabilities in Korea. https://bit.ly/3S3kmruGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Sungchul Jung, Richard Li, Ryan McKee, Mary C Whitton, and Robert W Lindeman. 2021. Floor-vibration vr: mitigating cybersickness using whole-body tactile stimuli in highly realistic vehicle driving experiences. IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics 27, 05(2021), 2669–2680.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Daniel Kahneman, W Scott Peavler, and Linda Onuska. 1968. Effects of verbalization and incentive on the pupil response to mental activity.Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie 22, 3(1968), 186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Michelle R Kandalaft, Nyaz Didehbani, Daniel C Krawczyk, Tandra T Allen, and Sandra B Chapman. 2013. Virtual reality social cognition training for young adults with high-functioning autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 43, 1 (2013), 34–44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Sam Kavanagh, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Burkhard Wuensche, and Beryl Plimmer. 2017. A systematic review of virtual reality in education. Themes in Science and Technology Education 10, 2 (2017), 85–119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Fengfeng Ke and Sungwoong Lee. 2016. Virtual reality based collaborative design by children with high-functioning autism: Design-based flexibility, identity, and norm construction. Interactive Learning Environments 24, 7 (2016), 1511–1533.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Fengfeng Ke, Jewoong Moon, and Zlatko Sokolikj. 2022. Virtual reality–based social skills training for children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Special Education Technology 37, 1 (2022), 49–62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Bogoan Kim, Daehyoung Lee, Aehong Min, Seungwon Paik, Georgia Frey, Scott Bellini, Kyungsik Han, and Patrick C Shih. 2020. PuzzleWalk: A theory-driven iterative design inquiry of a mobile game for promoting physical activity in adults with autism spectrum disorder. PLoS One 15, 9 (2020), e0237966.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Jack A Kincaid, Fengchen Gong, Tianjie Jia, Hong Z Tan, Casey Kohr, and Gary Bertoline. 2021. A Study on VR Training of Baseball Athletes. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 187–204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Evdokimos I Konstantinidis, Magda Hitoglou-Antoniadou, Andrej Luneski, Panagiotis D Bamidis, and Maria M Nikolaidou. 2009. Using affective avatars and rich multimedia content for education of children with autism. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on pervasive technologies related to assistive environments. 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Krzysztof Krejtz, Andrew T Duchowski, Anna Niedzielska, Cezary Biele, and Izabela Krejtz. 2018. Eye tracking cognitive load using pupil diameter and microsaccades with fixed gaze. PloS one 13, 9 (2018), e0203629.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Uttama Lahiri, Esubalew Bekele, Elizabeth Dohrmann, Zachary Warren, and Nilanjan Sarkar. 2012. Design of a virtual reality based adaptive response technology for children with autism. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 21, 1(2012), 55–64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Liron Lamash, Evelyne Klinger, and Naomi Josman. 2017. Using a virtual supermarket to promote independent functioning among adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder. In 2017 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR). IEEE, 1–7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Daehyoung Lee, Georgia C Frey, Aehong Min, Bogoan Kim, Donetta J Cothran, Scott Bellini, Kyungsik Han, and Patrick C Shih. 2020. Usability inquiry of a gamified behavior change app for increasing physical activity and reducing sedentary behavior in adults with and without autism spectrum disorder. Health Informatics Journal 26, 4 (2020), 2992–3008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Susan R Leekam, Margot R Prior, and Mirko Uljarevic. 2011. Restricted and repetitive behaviors in autism spectrum disorders: a review of research in the last decade.Psychological bulletin 137, 4 (2011), 562.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Phil Lopes, Nana Tian, and Ronan Boulic. 2020. Eye thought you were sick! exploring eye behaviors for cybersickness detection in vr. In Motion, Interaction and Games. 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Dong Wei Lu, Jenn Wu Wang, and Andrew Chih Wei Huang. 2010. Differentiation of Internet addiction risk level based on autonomic nervous responses: the Internet-addiction hypothesis of autonomic activity. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 13, 4(2010), 371–378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Joseph P McCleery, Ashley Zitter, Rita Solórzano, Sinan Turnacioglu, Judith S Miller, Vijay Ravindran, and Julia Parish-Morris. 2020. Safety and feasibility of an immersive virtual reality intervention program for teaching police interaction skills to adolescents and adults with autism. Autism Research 13, 8 (2020), 1418–1424.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Patricia Mesa-Gresa, Hermenegildo Gil-Gómez, José-Antonio Lozano-Quilis, and José-Antonio Gil-Gómez. 2018. Effectiveness of virtual reality for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: an evidence-based systematic review. Sensors 18, 8 (2018), 2486.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Peter Mundy, Kwanguk Kim, Nancy McIntyre, Lindsay Lerro, and William Jarrold. 2016. Brief report: Joint attention and information processing in children with higher functioning autism spectrum disorders. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 46, 7 (2016), 2555–2560.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Michael W Norris, Kristen Spicer, and Traci Byrd. 2019. Virtual reality: the new pathway for effective safety training. Professional Safety 64, 06 (2019), 36–39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Walid Osamy, Ahmed Salim, and Ahmed M Khedr. 2020. An information entropy based-clustering algorithm for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Wireless networks 26, 3 (2020), 1869–1886.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Nikolay Pavlov. 2014. User interface for people with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications 2014 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Monica Pedrazza, Elena Trifiletti, Sabrina Berlanda, and Gian Antonio Di Bernardo. 2013. Self-efficacy in social work: Development and initial validation of the self-efficacy scale for social workers. Social Sciences 2, 3 (2013), 191–207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Xue-Yang Pei, Ting-Hua Yi, Chun-Xu Qu, and Hong-Nan Li. 2019. Conditional information entropy based sensor placement method considering separated model error and measurement noise. Journal of Sound and Vibration 449 (2019), 389–404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Nimesha Ranasinghe, Pravar Jain, Nguyen Thi Ngoc Tram, Koon Chuan Raymond Koh, David Tolley, Shienny Karwita, Lin Lien-Ya, Yan Liangkun, Kala Shamaiah, Chow Eason Wai Tung, 2018. Season traveller: Multisensory narration for enhancing the virtual reality experience. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Marta Robles, Negar Namdarian, Julia Otto, Evelyn Wassiljew, Nassir Navab, Christine M Falter-Wagner, and Daniel Roth. 2022. A Virtual Reality Based System for the Screening and Classification of Autism.IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 28, 5 (2022), 2168–2178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Mario Saiano, Laura Pellegrino, Maura Casadio, Susanna Summa, Eleonora Garbarino, Valentina Rossi, Daniela Dall’Agata, and Vittorio Sanguineti. 2015. Natural interfaces and virtual environments for the acquisition of street crossing and path following skills in adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders: a feasibility study. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 12, 1(2015), 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Harini Sampath, Ravi Agarwal, and Bipin Indurkhya. 2013. Assistive technology for children with autism-lessons for interaction design. In Proceedings of the 11th Asia Pacific Conference on Computer Human Interaction. 325–333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Thomas W Schubert. 2003. The sense of presence in virtual environments: A three-component scale measuring spatial presence, involvement, and realness.Z. für Medienpsychologie 15, 2 (2003), 69–71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Trisha Self, Rosalind R Scudder, Gamal Weheba, and Daiquirie Crumrine. 2007. A virtual approach to teaching safety skills to children with autism spectrum disorder. Topics in Language disorders 27, 3 (2007), 242–253.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Marco Simões, Miguel Bernardes, Fernando Barros, Miguel Castelo-Branco, 2018. Virtual travel training for autism spectrum disorder: proof-of-concept interventional study. JMIR serious games 6, 1 (2018), e8428.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Christian Sinnott, James Liu, Courtney Matera, Savannah Halow, Ann Jones, Matthew Moroz, Jeffrey Mulligan, Michael Crognale, Eelke Folmer, and Paul MacNeilage. 2019. Underwater virtual reality system for neutral buoyancy training: Development and evaluation. In 25th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Heather M Smith and Nancy E Betz. 2000. Development and validation of a scale of perceived social self-efficacy. Journal of career assessment 8, 3 (2000), 283–301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Matthew J Smith, Emily J Ginger, Katherine Wright, Michael A Wright, Julie Lounds Taylor, Laura Boteler Humm, Dale E Olsen, Morris D Bell, and Michael F Fleming. 2014. Virtual reality job interview training in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 44, 10(2014), 2450–2463.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Natalia Stewart Rosenfield, Kathleen Lamkin, Jennifer Re, Kendra Day, LouAnne Boyd, and Erik Linstead. 2019. A virtual reality system for practicing conversation skills for children with autism. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 3, 2 (2019), 28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Dorothy Strickland. 1997. Virtual reality for the treatment of autism. Virtual reality in neuro-psycho-physiology(1997), 81–86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Sai Sun, Paula J Webster, Yu Wang, Hongbo Yu, Rongjun Yu, and Shuo Wang. 2022. Reduced Pupil Oscillation During Facial Emotion Judgment in People with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of autism and developmental disorders (2022), 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Connie Sung, Annemarie Connor, June Chen, Chien-Chun Lin, Hung-Jen Kuo, and Jina Chun. 2019. Development, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of an employment-related social skills intervention for young adults with high-functioning autism. Autism 23, 6 (2019), 1542–1553.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Yonghang Tai, Lei Wei, Minhui Xiao, Hailing Zhou, Qiong Li, Junsheng Shi, and Saeid Nahavandi. 2018. A high-immersive medical training platform using direct intraoperative data. IEEE access 6(2018), 69438–69452.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Jimmy Tjen, Francesco Smarra, and Alessandro D’Innocenzo. 2020. An entropy-based sensor selection algorithm for structural damage detection. In 2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE). IEEE, 1566–1571.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Chiara Tortelli, Marco Turi, David C Burr, and Paola Binda. 2021. Pupillary responses obey Emmert’s law and co-vary with autistic traits. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 51, 8 (2021), 2908–2919.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Furui Wang, Zheng Chen, and Gangbing Song. 2020. Monitoring of multi-bolt connection looseness using entropy-based active sensing and genetic algorithm-based least square support vector machine. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 136 (2020), 106507.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Casey Weldon. 2021. Just Brew: Coffee shop offers jobs, training to people with developmental disabilities. https://bit.ly/3PyPugXGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Yee-Pay Wuang, Chien-Ling Huang, and Hsien-Yu Tsai. 2020. Sensory integration and perceptual-motor profiles in school-aged children with autistic spectrum disorder. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 16 (2020), 1661.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Tong Xue, Abdallah El Ali, Tianyi Zhang, Gangyi Ding, and Pablo Cesar. 2021. CEAP-360VR: A Continuous Physiological and Behavioral Emotion Annotation Dataset for 360 VR Videos. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia(2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Hee-Jeong Yoo, Geonho Bahn, In-Hee Cho, Eun-Kyung Kim, Joo-Hyun Kim, Jung-Won Min, Won-Hye Lee, Jun-Seong Seo, Sang-Shin Jun, Guiyoung Bong, 2014. A Randomized Controlled Trial of the K orean Version of the PEERS® Parent-Assisted Social Skills Training Program for Teens With ASD. Autism Research 7, 1 (2014), 145–161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Lian Zhang, Joshua Wade, Dayi Bian, Jing Fan, Amy Swanson, Amy Weitlauf, Zachary Warren, and Nilanjan Sarkar. 2017. Cognitive load measurement in a virtual reality-based driving system for autism intervention. IEEE transactions on affective computing 8, 2 (2017), 176–189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Dong Zhao and Jason Lucas. 2015. Virtual reality simulation for construction safety promotion. International journal of injury control and safety promotion 22, 1(2015), 57–67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Wenbing Zhao, Xiongyi Liu, Tie Qiu, and Xiong Luo. 2020. Virtual avatar-based life coaching for children with autism spectrum disorder. Computer 53, 2 (2020), 26–34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. Zhong Zhao, Zhipeng Zhu, Xiaobin Zhang, Haiming Tang, Jiayi Xing, Xinyao Hu, Jianping Lu, Qiongling Peng, and Xingda Qu. 2021. Atypical Head Movement during Face-to-Face Interaction in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Autism Research 14, 6 (2021), 1197–1208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. VISTA: User-centered VR Training System for Effectively Deriving Characteristics of People with Autism Spectrum Disorder
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              VRST '22: Proceedings of the 28th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology
              November 2022
              466 pages
              ISBN:9781450398893
              DOI:10.1145/3562939

              Copyright © 2022 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 29 November 2022

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate66of254submissions,26%

              Upcoming Conference

              VRST '24

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format