skip to main content
10.1145/3563357.3567831acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Conceptual design of a digital twin-enabled building envelope energy audits and multi-fidelity simulation framework for a computationally explainable retrofit plan

Published:08 December 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Building envelope retrofit plans should be assessed before execution. However, current building energy simulation for retrofit is mainly based on parameters as they are documented instead of in their present conditions. Researchers have applied digital twins (DT) to consider more dynamic processes for such tasks. Researchers need to solve the data exchange issues between the physical and digital worlds to fully use DT in terms of its real-time and multi-fidelity simulation features. They must also solve model updating issues between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM).

We propose a DT-enabled co-simulation framework for building envelope energy audits and pixel-level simulation. This framework first analyzes inputs and outputs between building physical twin (PT) and DT for energy audits and indicates current technology restrictions to transferring data from PT to DT for building energy simulation. Second, the framework analyzes requirements for as-is simulation-related building parameters and illustrates current research gaps for model updating between BIM and BEM. Third, the framework introduces co-simulation approaches for building energy simulation and indicates how data is exchanged in co-simulation and how simulation results are interpreted for generating retrofit plans. Last, the framework presents current gaps for tracing retrofit plans back to building envelopes and how information is exchanged from DT to PT. Our studies contribute to (1) studying and defining a DT-enabled framework for building energy audits and multiresolution simulation, (2) systematically visualizing the data requirements for this proposed framework, and (3) investigating current technologies and research gaps for such a framework.

References

  1. Y. Hou, M. Chen, R. Volk, and L. Soibelman, "Investigation on performance of RGB point cloud and thermal information data fusion for 3D building thermal map modeling using aerial images under different experimental conditions," J. Build. Eng., vol. 45, p. 103380, Jan. 2022 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. P. Kim, L. Price, Y. Cho, and J. Park, UAV-UGV Cooperative 3D Environmental Mapping. 2019. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. T. Rakha, Y. El Masri, K. Chen, E. Panagoulia, and P. De Wilde,"Building envelope anomaly characterization and simulation usingdrone time-lapse thermography," Energy Build., vol. 259, p. 111754,Mar. 2022 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. H. Andersson, K. Simonsson, D. Hilding, M. Schill, E. Sigfridsson,and D. Leidermark, "Validation of a co-simulation approach forhydraulic percussion units applied to a hydraulic hammer," Adv. Eng. Softw., vol. 131, pp. 102--115, May 2019, doi: a. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L. Gryga and B. Rossi, Co-simulation of Smart Grids: Dynamically Changing Topologies in Failure Scenarios. SciTePress, 2021. Accessed: Jul. 30, 2022. [Online]. Available:https://www.muni.cz/vyzkum/publikace/1762896Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Grieves, "Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence through Virtual Factory Replication," Mar. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C. Boje, A. Guerriero, S. Kubicki, and Y. Rezgui, "Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research," Autom. Constr., vol. 114, p. 103179, Jun. 2020 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. F. Tao, Q. Qi, L. Wang, and A. Y. C. Nee, "Digital Twins and Cyber-Physical Systems toward Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0:Correlation and Comparison," Engineering, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 653--a. 661, Aug. 2019 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. T. Rakha and A. Gorodetsky, "Review of Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) applications in the built environment: Towards automated building inspection procedures using drones," Autom. Constr., vol. 93, pp. 252--264, Sep. 2018 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Z. Mayer, J. Kahn, Y. Hou, and R. Volk, "AI-based thermal bridge detection of building rooftops on district scale using aerial images," in EG-ICE 2021 Workshop on Intelligent Computing in Engineering. Ed.: Jimmy Abualdenien, André Borrmann, Lucian-Constantin Ungureanu, Timo Hartmann, 2021, p. 497. Accessed: Jul. 30, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000136256Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. E. Tuegel, A. Ingraffea, T. Eason, and S. Spottswood, "Reengineering Aircraft Structural Life Prediction Using a Digital Twin," 2011 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. C. Li, S. Mahadevan, Y. Ling, L. Wang, and S. Choze, "A dynamic Bayesian network approach for digital twin," in 19th AIAA Non-Deterministic Approaches Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. N. Salman, A. Khan, A. H. Kemp, and C. J. Noakes, "Indoor Temperature Forecast based on the Lattice Boltzmann method and Data Assimilation," Build. Environ., vol. 210, pp. 108654--108654, Feb. 2022.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. T. Li, Y. Zhao, C. Zhang, J. Luo, and X. Zhang, "A knowledge guided and data-driven method for building HVAC systems fault diagnosis," Build. Environ., vol. 198, p. 107850, Jul. 2021 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. M. Otter, H. Elmqvist, and S. E. Mattsson, "Hybrid modeling in Modelica based on the synchronous data flow principle," in Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on ComputerAided Control System Design (Cat. No.99TH8404), Aug. 1999, pp.151--157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Angelosanti, N. N. Kulkarni, and A. Sabato, "Combination of Building Information Modeling and Infrared Point Cloud for Nondestructive Evaluation," in 2022 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Living Environment (MetroLivEn), May 2022, pp. 269--273. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. H. Rallapalli, "A Comparison of Energy Plus and eQUEST Whole Building Energy Simulation Results for a Medium Sized Office Building," undefined, 2010, Accessed: Jul. 30, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-Comparison-of-Energy-Plus-and-eQUEST-Whole-Energy-Rallapalli/eb9b00063505f2c750e6c780bdad36ebf0dcbde3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. Wetter et al., "Lifting the garage door on spawn, and open-source BEM - controls engine," p. 8, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. D. Blum et al., "Building optimization testing framework (BOPTEST) for simulation-based benchmarking of control strategies in buildings," J. Build. Perform. Simul., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 586--610, Sep. 2021 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. M. Wiens, T. Meyer, and P. Thomas, "The Potential of FMI for the Development of Digital Twins for Large Modular Multi-Domain Systems," Model. Conf., pp. 235--240, Sep. 2021 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. P. E. Leser and J. E. Warner, "A Diagnosis-Prognosis Feedback Loop for Improved Performance Under Uncertainties," Grapevine, TX, Jan. 2017. Accessed: Jul. 30, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20170001320Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    BuildSys '22: Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation
    November 2022
    535 pages
    ISBN:9781450398909
    DOI:10.1145/3563357

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 8 December 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate148of500submissions,30%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)80
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader