skip to main content
10.1145/3563822.3568018acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessplashConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Formal Probabilistic Risk Assessment of a Nuclear Power Plant

Published:01 December 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Functional Block Diagrams (FBD) are commonly used as a graphical representation for probabilistic risk assessment in a wide range of complex engineering applications. An FBD models the stochastic behavior and cascading dependencies of system components or subsystems. Within FBD-based safety analysis, Event Trees (ET) dependability modeling techniques are typically used to associate all possible risk events to each subsystem. In this paper, we conduct the formal modeling and probabilistic risk assessment of a nuclear power plant in the HOL4 theorem prover. Using an FBD modeling in HOL4 of the nuclear Boiling Water Reactor (BWR), we formally determine all possible classes of accident events that can occur in the BWR. We compare our formal analysis in HOL4 with those obtained analytically and by simulation using Matlab and the specialized Isograph tool. Experimental results showed the superiority of our approach in terms of scalability, expressiveness, accuracy and CPU time.

References

  1. M. Abdelghany. 2021. Formal Probabilistic Risk Assessment using Theorem Proving with Applications in Power Systems, PhD thesis, Concordia university, Montreal, QC, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Abdelghany, W. Ahmad, and S. Tahar. 2022. Event Tree Reliability Analysis of Safety-Critical Systems Using Theorem Proving. IEEE Systems Journal 16, 2 ( 2022 ), 2899-2910. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. Abdelghany and S. Tahar. 2020. Event Tree Reliability Analysis of Electrical Power Generation Network using Formal Techniques. In Electric Power and Energy Conference. IEEE, 1-7. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Abdelghany and S. Tahar. 2021. Cause-Consequence Diagram Reliability Analysis Using Formal Techniques With Application to Electrical Power Networks. IEEE Access 9 ( 2021 ), 23929-23943. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Abdelghany and S. Tahar. 2022. Reliability Analysis of Smart Grids Using Formal Methods. In Handbook of Smart Energy Systems. Springer, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72322-4_81-1 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. S. Ahmed. 2019. The Impact of Emergency Operating Safety Procedures on Mitigation the Nuclear Thermal Power Plant Severe Accident. Annals of Nuclear Energy 125 ( 2019 ), 222-230. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. N. Allan. 2013. Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems. Springer Science & Business Media. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. L. Boulanger. 2015. CENELEC 50128 and IEC 62279 Standards. John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Čepin. 2011. Assessment of Power System Reliability: Methods and Applications. Springer Sci. & Bus. Media. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Choi and H. Seok. 2020. Development of Risk Assessment Framework and the Case Study for a Spent Fuel Pool of a Nuclear Power Plant. Nuclear Engineering and Technology ( 2020 ). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. I. Papazoglou. 1998. Functional Block Diagrams and Automated Construction of Event Trees. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 61, 3 ( 1998 ), 185-214. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Isograph. 2022. https://www.isograph.com Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. R. Karki, R. Billinton, and A. K. Verma. 2014. Reliability Modeling and Analysis of Smart Power Systems. Springer Science & Business Media. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Lee and N.J McCormick. 2011. Risk and Safety Analysis of Nuclear Systems. John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. N. Limnios. 2013. Fault Trees. John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. R. E. Mackiewicz. 2006. Overview of IEC 61850 and Benefits. In Power Systems Conference and Exposition. IEEE, 623-630. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. R. Palin, D. Ward, I. Habli, and R. Rivett. 2011. ISO 26262 Safety Cases: Compliance and Assurance. In IET Conference on System Safety. 1-6. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. N. Papakonstantinou, S. Sierla, B. O 'Halloran, and Y. Tumer. 2013. A Simulation based Approach to Automate Event Tree Generation for Early Complex System Designs. In Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol. 55867. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1-10. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. I. Papazoglou. 1998. Mathematical Foundations of Event Trees. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 61, 3 ( 1998 ), 169-183. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. D. E. Peplow, C. D. Sulfredge, R. L. Sanders, R. H. Morris, and T. A. Hann. 2004. Calculating Nuclear Power Plant Vulnerability Using Integrated Geometry and Event/Fault-Tree Models. Nuclear Science and Engineering 146, 1 ( 2004 ), 71-87. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. HOL4 Theorem Prover. 2022. https://hol-theorem-prover.org Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. K. Trivedi and A. Bobbio. 2017. Reliability Block Diagrams. In Reliability and Availability Engineering: Modeling, Analysis, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 105-149. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Formal Probabilistic Risk Assessment of a Nuclear Power Plant

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader