skip to main content
10.1145/3568162.3578624acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reimagining Robots for Dementia: From Robots for Care-receivers/giver to Robots for Carepartners

Published:13 March 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Informal caregivers are the main source of dementia care. Considering the importance of both family caregivers and persons living with dementia (PwDs), this paper explores how these two parties go through their dementia journey and how they envision robots to support them. We adopt a person-centered care approach which views these couples as reciprocal carepartners, rather than as care-givers and care-receivers. We conducted a community-based participatory research study with a dementia advocacy organization to imagine how robots can support these dementia dyads. The contribution of this paper is threefold: First, we introduce a person-centered care approach and show how this new approach reveals the issues of PwDs and carepartners (CPs) as partners and citizens. For example, PwDs' main challenges were not dementia symptoms but the concomitant stigma such as fears of being considered abnormal. This issue has rarely been discussed in HRI. Second, we suggest slow communication as an important robot design feature. When robots can wait for PwDs to proceed with information without judging PwDs' relatively slow response, PwDs feel respected and less stigmatized. Third, we address the importance of paying attention to disagreements between PwDs and CPs about robot design preferences. Considering the interdependency of the two parties, robot design processes should allow the two to negotiate.

References

  1. Hojjat Abdollahi, Ali Mollahosseini, Josh T Lane, and Mohammad H Mahoor. 2017. A pilot study on using an intelligent life-like robot as a companion for elderly individuals with dementia and depression. In 2017 IEEE-RAS 17th International Conference on Humanoid Robotics (Humanoids). IEEE, 541--546.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Sajay Arthanat, Momotaz Begum, Tianyi Gu, Dain P LaRoche, Dongpeng Xu, and Naiqian Zhang. 2020. Caregiver perspectives on a smart home-based socially assistive robot for individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, Vol. 15, 7 (2020), 789--798.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Alzheimer's Association. 2019. 2019 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimer's & dementia , Vol. 15, 3 (2019), 321--387.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Arlene J Astell, Nicole Bouranis, Jesse Hoey, Allison Lindauer, Alex Mihailidis, Chris Nugent, Julie M Robillard, et al. 2019. Technology and dementia: The future is now. Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders , Vol. 47, 3 (2019), 131--139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Clive Baldwin and Andrea Capstick. 2007. Tom Kitwood on dementia: A reader and critical commentary. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Momotaz Begum, Rosalie Wang, Rajibul Huq, and Alex Mihailidis. 2013. Performance of daily activities by older adults with dementia: The role of an assistive robot. In 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Suzanne Cahill, Jurate Macijauskiene, Aase-Marit Nygård, Jon-Paul Faulkner, and Inger Hagen. 2007. Technology in dementia care. Technology and Disability , Vol. 19, 2--3 (2007), 55--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Marilyn Cash. 2003. Assistive technology and people with dementia. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology , Vol. 13, 4 (2003), 313--319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kathy Charmaz. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lynn Chenoweth, Madeleine T King, Yun-Hee Jeon, Henry Brodaty, Jane Stein-Parbury, Richard Norman, Marion Haas, and Georgina Luscombe. 2009. Caring for Aged Dementia Care Resident Study (CADRES) of person-centred care, dementia-care mapping, and usual care in dementia: a cluster-randomised trial. The Lancet Neurology, Vol. 8, 4 (2009), 317--325.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Winnie Chi, Emily Graf, Landon Hughes, Jean Hastie, Galina Khatutsky, S Shuman, and H Lamont. 2019. Community-dwelling older adults with dementia and their caregivers: Key indicators from the national health and aging trends study. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant ?.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mei-Tai Chu, Rajiv Khosla, Seyed Mohammad Sadegh Khaksar, and Khanh Nguyen. 2017. Service innovation through social robot engagement to improve dementia care quality. Assistive Technology, Vol. 29, 1 (2017), 8--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Linda Clare. 2002. Developing awareness about awareness in early-stage dementia: the role of psychosocial factors. Dementia, Vol. 1, 3 (2002), 295--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Dagoberto Cruz-Sandoval, Arturo Morales-Tellez, Eduardo Benitez Sandoval, and Jesus Favela. 2020. A social robot as therapy facilitator in interventions to deal with dementia-related behavioral symptoms. In 2020 15th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 161--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Murna Downs. 1997. The emergence of the person in dementia research. Ageing & Society, Vol. 17, 5 (1997), 597--607.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Timothy D Epp. 2003. Person-centred dementia care: A vision to be refined. The Canadian Alzheimer Disease Review , Vol. 5, 3 (2003), 14--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Moojan Ghafurian, Jesse Hoey, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2021. Social robots for the care of persons with dementia: A systematic review. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), Vol. 10, 4 (2021), 1--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J Gilliard. 2001. The perspectives of people with dementia, their families and their carers. A handbook of dementia care (2001), 77--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Brenda A Gillies. 2000. A memory like clockwork: Accounts of living through dementia. (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Malcolm Goldsmith. 1996. Hearing the voice of people with dementia: Opportunities and obstacles. Readers Digest.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Denise Hebesberger, Tobias Koertner, Christoph Gisinger, Juergen Pripfl, and Christian Dondrup. 2016. Lessons learned from the deployment of a long-term autonomous robot as companion in physical therapy for older adults with dementia a mixed methods study. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 27--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Ingrid Hellström, Mike Nolan, and Ulla Lundh. 2005. "We do things together' A case study of ?couplehood'in dementia. Dementia, Vol. 4, 1 (2005), 7--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Nina Jøranson, Ingeborg Pedersen, Anne Marie Mork Rokstad, and Camilla Ihlebaek. 2015. Effects on symptoms of agitation and depression in persons with dementia participating in robot-assisted activity: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Vol. 16, 10 (2015), 867--873.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Judith D Kasper, Vicki A Freedman, Brenda C Spillman, and Jennifer L Wolff. 2015. The disproportionate impact of dementia on family and unpaid caregiving to older adults. Health Affairs, Vol. 34, 10 (2015), 1642--1649.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Rajiv Khosla, Mei-Tai Chu, Seyed Mohammad Sadegh Khaksar, Khanh Nguyen, and Toyoaki Nishida. 2021. Engagement and experience of older people with socially assistive robots in home care. Assistive Technology, Vol. 33, 2 (2021), 57--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Tom Kitwood and Kathleen Bredin. 1992. Towards a theory of dementia care: personhood and well-being. Ageing & Society, Vol. 12, 3 (1992), 269--287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Thomas Marris Kitwood and TM Kitwood. 1997. Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Vol. 20. Open university press Buckingham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ioannis Kostavelis, Dimitrios Giakoumis, Georgia Peleka, Andreas Kargakos, Evangelos Skartados, Manolis Vasileiadis, and Dimitrios Tzovaras. 2018. RAMCIP robot: a personal robotic assistant; demonstration of a complete framework. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) workshops. 0--0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Hee Rin Lee, EunJeong Cheon, Chaeyun Lim, and Kerstin Fischer. 2022. Configuring humans: What roles humans play in hri research. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 478--492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Hee Rin Lee and Laurel D Riek. 2018. Reframing assistive robots to promote successful aging. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), Vol. 7, 1 (2018), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Hee Rin Lee and Laurel D Riek. 2022. Designing Robots for Aging: Wisdom as a Critical Lens. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Hee Rin Lee, Selma vS abanović, and Sonya S Kwak. 2017. Collaborative map making: a reflexive method for understanding matters of concern in design research. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5678--5689.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Hee Rin Lee, Haodan Tan, and Selma vS abanović. 2016. That robot is not for me: Addressing stereotypes of aging in assistive robot design. In 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 312--317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Amy Liang, Isabell Piroth, Hayley Robinson, Bruce MacDonald, Mark Fisher, Urs M Nater, Nadine Skoluda, and Elizabeth Broadbent. 2017. A pilot randomized trial of a companion robot for people with dementia living in the community. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Vol. 18, 10 (2017), 871--878.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Alexander Libin and Jiska Cohen-Mansfield. 2004. Therapeutic robocat for nursing home residents with dementia: preliminary inquiry. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias® , Vol. 19, 2 (2004), 111--116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Klara Lorenz, Paul P Freddolino, Adelina Comas-Herrera, Martin Knapp, and Jacqueline Damant. 2019. Technology-based tools and services for people with dementia and carers: Mapping technology onto the dementia care pathway. Dementia, Vol. 18, 2 (2019), 725--741.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Maria Luce Lupetti, Cristina Zaga, and Nazli Cila. 2021. Designerly ways of knowing in HRI: Broadening the scope of design-oriented HRI through the concept of intermediate-level knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 389--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Francisco Mart'in Rico, Carlos Agüero Durán, José Mar'ia Ca nas Plaza, Gonzalo Abella Dago, Raúl Ben'itez Mej'ias, Sergio Rivero Espinosa, Meritxell Valent'i Soler, and Pablo Mart'inez Mart'in. 2013. Robots in therapy for dementia patients. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Marcia S Marx, Jiska Cohen-Mansfield, Natalie G Regier, Maha Dakheel-Ali, Ashok Srihari, and Khin Thein. 2010. The impact of different dog-related stimuli on engagement of persons with dementia. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias® , Vol. 25, 1 (2010), 37--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. M Mather and P Scommegna. 2020. The demography of dementia and dementia caregiving. Today's Research on Aging. Published (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Sanika Moharana, Alejandro E Panduro, Hee Rin Lee, and Laurel D Riek. 2019. Robots for joy, robots for sorrow: community based robot design for dementia caregivers. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 458--467.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Victoria J Molyneaux, Sarah Butchard, Jane Simpson, and Craig Murray. 2012. The co-construction of couplehood in dementia. Dementia, Vol. 11, 4 (2012), 483--502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Rhonda JV Montgomery and KN Williams. 2001. Implications of differential impacts of care-giving for future research on Alzheimer care. Aging & Mental Health, Vol. 5, sup1 (2001), 23--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Heehyul Moon, Aloen L Townsend, Carol J Whitlatch, and Peggye Dilworth-Anderson. 2017. Quality of life for dementia caregiving dyads: Effects of incongruent perceptions of everyday care and values. The Gerontologist, Vol. 57, 4 (2017), 657--666.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Wendy Moyle. 2019. The promise of technology in the future of dementia care. Nature Reviews Neurology , Vol. 15, 6 (2019), 353--359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Wendy Moyle, Cindy Jones, Marie Cooke, Siobhan O'Dwyer, Billy Sung, and Suzie Drummond. 2014. Connecting the person with dementia and family: a feasibility study of a telepresence robot. BMC geriatrics, Vol. 14, 1 (2014), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Wendy Moyle, Cindy J Jones, Jenny E Murfield, Lukman Thalib, Elizabeth RA Beattie, David KH Shum, Siobhan T O'Dwyer, M Cindy Mervin, and Brian M Draper. 2017. Use of a robotic seal as a therapeutic tool to improve dementia symptoms: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Vol. 18, 9 (2017), 766--773.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Annakarin Olsson, Maria Engström, Kirsti Skovdahl, and Claudia Lampic. 2012. My, your and our needs for safety and security: relatives' reflections on using information and communication technology in dementia care. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences , Vol. 26, 1 (2012), 104--112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Sandra Petersen, Susan Houston, Huanying Qin, Corey Tague, and Jill Studley. 2017. The utilization of robotic pets in dementia care. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease , Vol. 55, 2 (2017), 569--574.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Alison Phinney. 1998. Living with dementia from the patient's perspective. , 8--9 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Alison Phinney. 2006. Family strategies for supporting involvement in meaningful activity by persons with dementia. Journal of Family Nursing , Vol. 12, 1 (2006), 80--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. P Robinson, S-L Ekman, AI Meleis, B Winblad, and L-O Wahlund. 1997. Suffering in silence: the experience of early memory loss. Health Care in Later Life , Vol. 2 (1997), 107--120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Selma vS abanović , Casey C Bennett, Wan-Ling Chang, and Lesa Huber. 2013. PARO robot affects diverse interaction modalities in group sensory therapy for older adults with dementia. In 2013 IEEE 13th international conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR). IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Claudia Salatino, Valerio Gower, Meftah Ghrissi, Adriana Tapus, K Wieczorowska-Tobis, A Suwalska, Paolo Barattini, Roberto Rosso, Giulia Munaro, Nicola Bellotto, et al. 2016. Enrichme: a robotic solution for independence and active aging of elderly people with mci. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Ji Youn Shin, Dima Chaar, Catherine Davis, Sung Won Choi, and Hee Rin Lee. 2021. Every Cloud Has a Silver Lining: Exploring Experiential Knowledge and Assets of Family Caregivers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Cherie Simpson and Gayle Acton. 2013. Emotion work in family caregiving for persons with dementia. Issues in Mental Health Nursing , Vol. 34, 1 (2013), 52--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Silvia Sörensen, Paul Duberstein, David Gill, and Martin Pinquart. 2006. Dementia care: mental health effects, intervention strategies, and clinical implications. The Lancet Neurology, Vol. 5, 11 (2006), 961--973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Robert Sparrow. 2016. Robots in aged care: a dystopian future? AI & society, Vol. 31, 4 (2016), 445--454.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Hidenobu Sumioka, Masahiro Shiomi, Miwako Honda, and Atsushi Nakazawa. 2021. Technical challenges for smooth interaction with seniors with dementia: Lessons from humanitude?. Frontiers in Robotics and AI , Vol. 8 (2021), 650906.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Adriana Tapus. 2009. Improving the quality of life of people with dementia through the use of socially assistive robots. In 2009 Advanced Technologies for Enhanced Quality of Life. IEEE, 81--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Meritxell Valent'i Soler, Luis Agüera-Ortiz, Javier Olazarán Rodr'iguez, Carolina Mendoza Rebolledo, Almudena Pérez Mu noz, Irene Rodr'iguez Pérez, Emma Osa Ruiz, Ana Barrios Sánchez, Vanesa Herrero Cano, Laura Carrasco Chillón, et al. 2015. Social robots in advanced dementia. Frontiers in aging neuroscience , Vol. 7 (2015), 133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Kazuyoshi Wada, Takanori Shibata, Tomoko Saito, and Kazuo Tanie. 2002. Robot assisted activity for elderly people and nurses at a day service center. In Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No. 02CH37292), Vol. 2. IEEE, 1416--1421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Olivia Wadham, Jane Simpson, Jonathan Rust, and Craig Murray. 2016. Couples' shared experiences of dementia: a meta-synthesis of the impact upon relationships and couplehood. Aging & mental health , Vol. 20, 5 (2016), 463--473.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Nina B Wallerstein and Bonnie Duran. 2006. Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health promotion practice , Vol. 7, 3 (2006), 312--323.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Rosalie H Wang, Aishwarya Sudhama, Momotaz Begum, Rajibul Huq, and Alex Mihailidis. 2017. Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers. International psychogeriatrics , Vol. 29, 1 (2017), 67--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Kristine N Williams, Ruth Herman, Byron Gajewski, and Kristel Wilson. 2009. Elderspeak communication: Impact on dementia care. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias® , Vol. 24, 1 (2009), 11--20. ioGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Reimagining Robots for Dementia: From Robots for Care-receivers/giver to Robots for Carepartners

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
      March 2023
      631 pages
      ISBN:9781450399647
      DOI:10.1145/3568162

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 March 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader