skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

"I Go Beyond and Beyond" Examining the Invisible Work of Home Health Aides

Published:16 April 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Home health aides are paid professionals who provide long-term care to an expanding population of adults who need it. However, aides' work is often unrecognized by the broader caregiving team despite being in demand and crucial to care---an invisibility reinforced by ill-suited technological tools. In order to understand the invisible work aides perform and its relationship to technology design, we interviewed 13 aides employed by home care agencies in New York City. These aides shared examples that demonstrated the intertwined nature of both types of invisible work (i.e., emotions- and systems-based) and expanded the sociological mechanisms of invisibility (i.e., sociocultural, sociolegal, sociospatial) to include the sociotechnical. Through these findings, we investigate the opportunities, tensions, and challenges that could inform the design of tools created for these important, but often overlooked, frontline caregivers.

References

  1. [n. d.]. Workforce Management Software for Home Care Agencies & Caregivers. https://www.careconnectmobile.com/. Accessed: 2021--8--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2015. The Home Health Care Industry's Organizing Nightmare. https://tcf.org/content/commentary/the-home-health-care-industrys-organizing-nightmare/. Accessed: 2021--8--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2022. Sandata: Agency Management Tools for Home Care Providers. https://www.sandata.com/home-care/. Accessed: 2021--8--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Davina Allen. 2014. The Invisible Work of Nurses: Hospitals, Organisation and Healthcare. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Alison Ashley, Sandra S Butler, and Nancy Fishwick. 2010. Home care aides' voices from the field: job experiences of personal support specialists. Home Healthc. Nurse 28, 7 (July 2010), 399--405.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Nancy K Baym. 2015. Connect With Your Audience! The Relational Labor of Connection. The Communication Review 18, 1 (Jan. 2015), 14--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Annette Bernhardt, Lisa Kresge, and Reem Suleiman. 2021. Data and Algorithms at Work: The Case for Worker Technology Rights. San Francisco: UC Berkeley Labor Center. https://laborcenter. berkeley. edu/data-algorithms-at-work (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Eileen Boris and Jennifer Klein. 2006. Organizing Home Care: Low-Waged Workers in the Welfare State. Polit. Soc. 34, 1 (March 2006), 81--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Geoffrey C Bowker and Susan Leigh Star. 1999. What a Difference a Name Makes-the Classification of Nursing Work. In Sorting Things Out : Classification and Its Consequences, Geoffrey C Bowker and Susan Leigh Star (Eds.). The MIT Press, 229--254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. V Braun and V Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Graham Button and Richard Harper. 1995. The relevance of ?work-practice' for design. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 4, 4 (Dec. 1995), 263--280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Stevie Chancellor, Shion Guha, Jofish Kaye, Jen King, Niloufar Salehi, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Elizabeth Stowell. 2019. The Relationships between Data, Power, and Justice in CSCW Research. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Austin, TX, USA) (CSCW '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 102--105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kathy Charmaz. 2011. Grounded Theory Methods in Social Justice Research. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, Norman K Denzin Yvonna (Ed.). SAGE Publications, 359--380.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Yunan Chen, Victor Ngo, and Sun Young Park. 2013. Caring for caregivers: designing for integrality. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 91--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Christina J Colclough. 2022. Righting the Wrong: Putting Workers' Data Rights Firmly on the Table. In Digital Work in the Planetary Market, Mark Graham and Fabian Ferrari (Eds.). The MIT Press, 291.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2020. Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need (Information Policy). The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Marion Crain, Winifred Poster, and Miriam Cherry. 2016. Invisible Labor: Hidden Work in the Contemporary World. Univ of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Arlene Kaplan Daniels. 1987. Invisible Work. Soc. Probl. 34, 5 (1987), 403--415.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Catherine D'Ignazio, Erhardt Graeff, Christina N Harrington, and Daniela K Rosner. 2020. Toward Equitable Participatory Design: Data Feminism for CSCW amidst Multiple Pandemics. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Virtual Event, USA) (CSCW '20 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 437--445.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Catherine D'Ignazio and Lauren F Klein. 2020. Data Feminism. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lynn Dombrowski, Adriana Alvarado Garcia, and Jessica Despard. 2017. Low-Wage Precarious Workers' Sociotechnical Practices Working Towards Addressing Wage Theft. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4585--4598.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Brisbane, QLD, Australia) (DIS '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 656--671.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Paula England. 2005. Emerging Theories of Care Work. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 31, 1 (Aug. 2005), 381--399.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Silvia Federici. 2004. Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body, and Primitive Accumulation. Autonomedia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Leon Fink and Brian Greenberg. 2009. Upheaval in the Quiet Zone: 1199SEIU and the Politics of Health Care Unionism. University of Illinois Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Geraldine Foley and Virpi Timonen. 2015. Using Grounded Theory Method to Capture and Analyze Health Care Experiences. Health Serv. Res. 50, 4 (Aug. 2015), 1195--1210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Emily Franzosa, Emma K Tsui, and Sherry Baron. 2019. ?Who's Caring for Us?": Understanding and Addressing the Effects of Emotional Labor on Home Health Aides' Well-being. Gerontologist 59, 6 (Nov. 2019), 1055--1064.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Sucheta Ghoshal, Rishma Mendhekar, and Amy Bruckman. 2020. Toward a Grassroots Culture of Technology Practice. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW1 (May 2020), 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Evelyn Nakano Glenn. 2010. Forced to Care: Coercion and Caregiving in America. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Mary L Gray and Siddharth Suri. 2019. Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass (illustrated edition ed.). Mariner Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Teresa Hagan and David Smail. 1997. Power-mapping-I. Background and basic methodology. J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol. 7, 4 (Sept. 1997), 257--267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Erin Hatton. 2017. Mechanisms of invisibility: rethinking the concept of invisible work. Work Employ. Soc. 31, 2 (April 2017), 336--351.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Arlie Russell Hochschild. 2012. The Managed Heart. University of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Ivan Illich. 1981. Shadow Work. Marion Boyars.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Lilly C Irani and M Six Silberman. 2013. Turkopticon: Interrupting worker invisibility in amazon mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 611--620.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Sarah Jaffe. 2021. Who Cares? https://thebaffler.com/salvos/who-cares-jaffe. Accessed: 2021--8--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Alethia Jones. 2019. Agents of Change: How Allied Healthcare Workers Transform Inequalities in the Healthcare Industry. In Structural Competency in Mental Health and Medicine: A Case-Based Approach to Treating the Social Determinants of Health, Helena Hansen and Jonathan M Metzl (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 191--209.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Naveena Karusala, Azra Ismail, Karthik S Bhat, Aakash Gautam, Sachin R Pendse, Neha Kumar, Richard Anderson, Madeline Balaam, Shaowen Bardzell, Nicola J Bidwell, Melissa Densmore, Elizabeth Kaziunas, Anne Marie Piper, Noopur Raval, Pushpendra Singh, Austin Toombs, Nervo Verdezoto, and Ding Wang. 2021. The Future of Care Work: Towards a Radical Politics of Care in CSCW Research and Practice. In Companion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Virtual Event, USA) (CSCW '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 338--342.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Naveena Karusala, Ding Wang, and Jacki O'Neill. 2020. Making Chat at Home in the Hospital: Exploring Chat Use by Nurses. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Elizabeth Kaziunas, Michael S Klinkman, and Mark S Ackerman. 2019. Precarious Interventions: Designing for Ecologies of Care. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Vera Khovanskaya, Phoebe Sengers, and Lynn Dombrowski. 2020. Bottom-Up Organizing with Tools from On High: Understanding the Data Practices of Labor Organizers. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Joy Jeounghee Kim. 2022. Personal Care Aides as Household Employees and Independent Contractors: Estimating the Size and Job Characteristics of the Workforce. Innov Aging 6, 1 (2022), igab049.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Neha Kumar, Azra Ismail, Samyukta Sherugar, and Rajesh Chandwani. 2019. Restoration Work: Responding to Everyday Challenges of HIV Outreach. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Yanni Alexander Loukissas. 2019. All Data Are Local: Thinking Critically in a Data-Driven Society. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Shefali Luthra. 2018. Medicaid Officials Target Home Health Aides' Union Dues. NPR (Aug. 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Franco Mascayano, Els van der Ven, Maria Francesca Moro, Sara Schilling, Sebastián Alarcón, Josleen Al Barathie, Lubna Alnasser, Hiroki Asaoka, Olatunde Ayinde, Arin A Balalian, Armando Basagoitia, Kirsty Brittain, Bruce Dohrenwend, Sol Durand-Arias, Mehmet Eskin, Eduardo Fernández-Jiménez, Marcela Inés Freytes Frey, Luis Giménez, Lydia Gisle, Hans W Hoek, Rodrigo Ezequiel Jaldo, Jutta Lindert, Humberto Maldonado, Gonzalo Martínez-Alés, Carmen Martínez-Viciana, Roberto Mediavilla, Clare McCormack, Landon Myer, Javier Narvaez, Daisuke Nishi, Uta Ouali, Victor Puac-Polanco, Jorge Ramírez, Alexandra Restrepo-Henao, Eliut Rivera-Segarra, Ana M Rodríguez, Dahlia Saab, Dominika Seblova, Andrea Tenorio Correia da Silva, Linda Valeri, Rubén Alvarado, Ezra Susser, and HEROES group. 2022. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of healthcare workers: study protocol for the COVID-19 HEalth caRe wOrkErS (HEROES) study. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. (Jan. 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Alexandra Mateescu. 2021. Electronic Visit Verification: The Weight of Surveillance and the Fracturing of Care. Technical Report. Data & Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Hamid Mehmood, Sameea Ashraf, Ali Imran, and Samia Ibtasam. 2018. Scaling Mobile Applications Using Interactive-Device User Training. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (Menlo Park and San Jose, CA, USA) (COMPASS '18, Article 4). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Dawn Nafus and Rajiv Mehta. 2016. Atlas of Caregiving Pilot Study Report. Technical Report. Family Caregiver Alliance.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Bonnie A Nardi and Yrjö Engeström. 1999. A web on the wind: The structure of invisible work. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 8, 1--2 (1999), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. National Employment Law Project. 2016. Independent contractor classification in home care. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Chris Norval, Kristin Cornelius, Jennifer Cobbe, and Jatinder Singh. 2022. Disclosure by Design: Designing information disclosures to support meaningful transparency and accountability. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (FAccT '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 679--690.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Fabian Okeke, Emily Tseng, Benedetta Piantella, Mikaela Brown, Harveen Kaur, Madeline R Sterling, and Nicola Dell. 2019. Technology, home health care, and heart failure: a qualitative analysis with multiple stakeholders. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (Accra, Ghana) (COMPASS '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 122--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. PHI. 2020. Caring for the Future: The Power and Potential of America's Direct Care Workforce. https://phinational.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Caring-for-the-Future-2021-PHI.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. PHI. 2020. Direct care work is real work: Elevating the role of the direct care worker. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. PHI. 2020. Direct Care Workers in the United States: Key Facts. http://phinational.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Direct-Care-Workers-in-the-United-States-2020-PHI.pdf. Accessed: 2021--8-NA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Sanjay Pinto. 2021. Economic Democracy, Embodied: A Union Co-op Strategy for the Long-Term Care Sector. In Organizational imaginaries: Tempering capitalism and tending to communities through cooperatives and collectivist democracy., K Chen Katherine and Victor Tan Chen (Eds.). Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 72. Emerald Publishing Limited, 163--184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Anthony Poon, Vaidehi Hussain, Julia Loughman, Ariel C Avgar, Madeline Sterling, and Nicola Dell. 2021. Computer-Mediated Peer Support Needs of Home Care Workers: Emotional Labor & the Politics of Professionalism. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2 (Oct. 2021), 1--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Noopur Raval. 2021. Interrupting invisibility in a global world. ACM Interactions 28, 4 (Aug. 2021), 27--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Noopur Raval and Paul Dourish. 2016. Standing Out from the Crowd: Emotional Labor, Body Labor, and Temporal Labor in Ridesharing. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 97--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Horst W J Rittel and Melvin M Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 4, 2 (June 1973), 155--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Jennifer A Rode. 2010. The roles that make the domestic work. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (Savannah, Georgia, USA) (CSCW '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 381--390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Jathan Sadowski, Yolande Strengers, and Jenny Kennedy. 2021. More work for Big Mother: Revaluing care and control in smart homes. Environ. Plan. A (June 2021), 0308518X211022366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Kjeld Schmidt. 2011. The concept of ?work' in CSCW. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 20, 4--5 (Oct. 2011), 341--401.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Clare L Stacey. 2011. The Caring Self. In The Caring Self. Cornell University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Susan Leigh Star and Anselm Strauss. 1999. Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 8, 1 (March 1999), 9--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Madeline R Sterling, Nicola Dell, Benedetta Piantella, Jacklyn Cho, Harveen Kaur, Emily Tseng, Fabian Okeke, Mikaela Brown, Peggy B K Leung, Ariel F Silva, Amy L Shaw, and Lisa M Kern. 2020. Understanding the Workflow of Home Health Care for Patients with Heart Failure: Challenges and Opportunities. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 35, 6 (June 2020), 1721--1729.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Madeline R Sterling, Nicola Dell, Emily Tseng, Fabian Okeke, Jacklyn Cho, Benedetta Piantella, and Jonathan N Tobin. 2020. Home care workers caring for adults with heart failure need better access to training and technology: A role for implementation science. J Clin Transl Sci 4, 3 (April 2020), 224--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Allan Stisen, Nervo Verdezoto, Henrik Blunck, Mikkel Baun Kjærgaard, and Kaj Grønbæk. 2016. Accounting for the Invisible Work of Hospital Orderlies: Designing for Local and Global Coordination. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 980--992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Robyn I Stone. 2004. The direct care worker: the third rail of home care policy. Annu. Rev. Public Health 25 (2004), 521--537.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Lucy Suchman. 1995. Making Work Visible. Commun. ACM 38, 9 (Sept. 1995), 56--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Lucy Suchman. 1996. Supporting Articulation Work. In Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices, Rob Kling (Ed.). Morgan Kaufmann, 407--423.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Julia Ticona, Alexandra Mateescu, and Alex Rosenblat. 2018. Beyond Disruption: How Tech Shapes Labor Across Domestic Work & Ridehailing. Data & Society (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Kentaro Toyama. 2015. Geek Heresy: Rescuing Social Change from the Cult of Technology (f first edition ed.). PublicAffairs.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Emily Tseng, Fabian Okeke, Madeline Sterling, and Nicola Dell. 2020. ?We can learn. Why not?": Designing Technologies to Engender Equity for Home Health Aides. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2021. Home Health and Personal Care Aides. https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes311120.htm. Accessed: 2021--8--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Rama Adithya Varanasi, Aditya Vashishta, René F Kizilcec, and Nicola Dell. 2021. Investigating Technostress Among Teachers in Low-Income Indian Schools. (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Nervo Verdezoto, Naveen Bagalkot, Syeda Zainab Akbar, Swati Sharma, Nicola Mackintosh, Deirdre Harrington, and Paula Griffiths. 2021. The Invisible Work of Maintenance in Community Health: Challenges and Opportunities for Digital Health to Support Frontline Health Workers in Karnataka, South India. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Kristina Westerberg. 1999. Collaborative networks among female middle managers in a hierarchical organization. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 8, 1--2 (March 1999), 95--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Despoina Xanthopoulou, Arnold B Bakker, Wido G M Oerlemans, and Maria Koszucka. 2018. Need for recovery after emotional labor: Differential effects of daily deep and surface acting. J. Organ. Behav. 39, 4 (May 2018), 481--494.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. "I Go Beyond and Beyond" Examining the Invisible Work of Home Health Aides

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 7, Issue CSCW1
      CSCW
      April 2023
      3836 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3593053
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 April 2023
      Published in pacmhci Volume 7, Issue CSCW1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)280
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)31

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader