ABSTRACT
As one of the most popular cutting-edge technologies at present, brain computer interface technology has important research significance and great application prospects in bio-medicine, educational technology, electronic information and other fields, achieving a series of considerable scientific research results, its application fields continue to expand. This paper firstly describes the working process of BCI, by collecting the original EEG signals and preprocessing them, inputting into one or more feature extraction algorithms to encode information and commands and then establishing a classifier to classify their features, this process is to realize the analysis of human behavior and intention, BCI application is responsible for the specific expression of them. Secondly, we prospectively predict the application of this technology in the future war, such as the coordinated operation of brain-controlled robot forces and UAV groups, even utilizing BCI for reverse operations to defeat enemy forces through enemy forces, realizing a fully unmanned and highly intelligent combat mode. Finally, we summarized the shortcomings and ethical problems caused by BCI, for example, over-developed this technology will affect human physical and mental quality and personal privacy, even threaten social security. Due to the great uncertainty of war, there will be some certain risks, such as the instability of wireless technology and once important EEG signals are intercepted, it will bring huge risks and even disasters to military operations under brain control technology.
- X. Geng, D. Li, H. Chen, P. Yu, H. Yan, and M. Yue,. “An improved feature extraction algorithms of EEG signals based on motor imagery brain-computer interface.” Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2022, vol. 61(6), pp. 4807–4820.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. I. Carino-Escobar, M. A. Rodriguez-Barragan, P. Carrillo-Mora, and J. Cantillo-Negrete,. “Brain-computer interface as complementary therapy for hemiparesis in an astrocytoma patient.” Neurological Sciences, vol. 2022, 43(4), pp. 2879–2881.Google Scholar
- B. S. Baxter, B. J. Edelman, N. Nesbitt, and B. He,. “Sensorimotor Rhythm BCI with Simultaneous High Definition-Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Alters Task Performance.” Brain Stimulation, 2016, vol. 9(6), pp. 834–841.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. M. Mahmoud Saadabi,. “Non-Invasive Brain-Computer Interface Technology (BCI) Modalities and Implementation: A Review Article and Assimilation of BCI Models.” Annals of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, 2021, vol. 4(2).Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Zabcikova, Z. Koudelkova, R. Jasek, and J. J. Lorenzo Navarro,. “Recent advances and current trends in brain‐computer interface research and their applications.” International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 2022, vol. 82(2), pp. 107–123.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Kostrec, and B. Štědroň,. “Trends in the Brain-Computer Interface.” AUC KINANTHROPOLOGICA, 2021, vol. 57(1), pp. 79–91.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Wood,. “Bidirectional brain–computer interface aids robotic arm control.” Nature Reviews Neurology, 2021, vol. 17(8), pp. 462.Google Scholar
- X. Su, and T. Ping,. “E-book Retrieval and Reading System Based on Brain-Computer Interface.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2022, vol. 2171(1), pp. 012009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- I. S. Kotchetkov, B. Y. Hwang, G. Appelboom, C. P. Kellner, and E. S. Connolly,. “Brain-computer interfaces: military, neurosurgical, and ethical perspective.” Neurosurgical Focus, 2010, vol. 28(5), pp. E25.Google ScholarCross Ref
- X. Zhang, Q. She, Y. Chen, W. Kong, and C. Mei,. “Sub-band target alignment common spatial pattern in brain-computer interface.” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2021, vol. 207, pp. 106150.Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. M. K. K. M. B. Herath, and W. Mel,. “Controlling an Anatomical Robot Hand Using the Brain-Computer Interface Based on Motor Imagery.” Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2021, vol. 2021, pp. 1–15.Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Brain--computer interface (BCI): is it strictly necessary to use random sequences in visual spellers?
APCHI '12: Proceedings of the 10th asia pacific conference on Computer human interactionThe P300 speller is a standard paradigm for brain--computer interfacing (BCI) based on electroencephalography (EEG). It exploits the fact that the user's selective attention to a target stimulus among a random sequence of stimuli enhances the magnitude ...
Discriminating the brain activities for brain---computer interface applications through the optimal allocation-based approach
The translation of brain activities into signals in brain---computer interface (BCI) systems requires a robust and accurate classification to develop a communication system for motor disabled people. In BCIs, motor imagery (MI) tasks generate brain ...
Brain-computer interface research at Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
ISABEL '11: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication TechnologiesWe present an overview of our Brain-computer interface (BCI) research, invasive as well as non-invasive, during the past four years. The invasive BCIs are based on local field-and action potentials recorded with microelectrode arrays implanted in the ...
Comments