skip to main content
10.1145/3616392.3623420acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Robust Car-Following Control of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles: A Stochastic Model Predictive Control Approach

Published:30 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Vehicle platooning has gained significant attention due to its potential to enhance road safety and efficiency. Leveraging stochastic optimization methods, this paper presents a distributed Stochastic Model Predictive Control (SMPC) controller tailored for vehicle platooning systems to improve their safety and robustness. Uniquely, our methodology describes the vehicle's dynamic state and establishes the error equation for the platoon system founded on a mass-spring structure structural concept, a departure from existing models. Using this, we formulate an SMPC platoon control framework resilient to stochastic disturbances, effectively integrating desired objective and probabilistic chance constraints. Given the probabilistic information of the random perturbations, an equivalent, computationally efficient framework for the SMPC is deduced under a fixed distribution. Comprehensive simulation experiments serve to validate the efficacy of our proposed SMPC platoon controller.

References

  1. Siyuan Gong, Jinglai Shen, and Lili Du. 2016. Constrained optimization and distributed computation based car following control of a connected and autonomous vehicle platoon. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 94 (2016), 314--334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Edwin González, Javier Sanchis, Sergio García-Nieto, and José Salcedo. 2020. A comparative study of stochastic model predictive controllers. Electronics 9, 12 (2020), 2078.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jacopo Guanetti, Yeojun Kim, and Francesco Borrelli. 2018. Control of connected and automated vehicles: State of the art and future challenges. Annual reviews in control 45 (2018), 18--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tor Aksel N Heirung, Joel A Paulson, Jared O'Leary, and Ali Mesbah. 2018. Stochastic model predictive control-how does it work? Computers & Chemical Engineering 114 (2018), 158--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Manjiang Hu, Chongkang Li, Yougang Bian, Hui Zhang, Zhaobo Qin, and Biao Xu. 2022. Fuel Economy-Oriented Vehicle Platoon Control Using Economic Model Predictive Control. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 23, 11 (2022), 20836--20849. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2022.3183090Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Xiaorong Hu, Lantao Xie, Lei Xie, Shan Lu, Weihua Xu, and Hongye Su. 2022. Distributed model predictive control for vehicle platoon with mixed disturbances and model uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 23, 10 (2022), 17354--17365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Dongyao Jia, Kejie Lu, Jianping Wang, Xiang Zhang, and Xuemin Shen. 2016. A Survey on Platoon-Based Vehicular Cyber-Physical Systems. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 18, 1 (2016), 263--284. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST. 2015.2410831Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Zhiyang Ju, Hui Zhang, and Ying Tan. 2021. Distributed stochastic model predictive control for heterogeneous vehicle platoons subject to modeling uncertainties. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine 14, 2 (2021), 25--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Shengbo Eben Li, Yang Zheng, Keqiang Li, Yujia Wu, J. Karl Hedrick, Feng Gao, and Hongwei Zhang. 2017. Dynamical Modeling and Distributed Control of Connected and Automated Vehicles: Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine 9, 3 (2017), 46--58. https://doi.org/10. 1109/MITS.2017.2709781Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Yongfu Li, Zhenyu Zhong, Yu Song, Qi Sun, Hao Sun, Simon Hu, and Yibing Wang. 2022. Longitudinal Platoon Control of Connected Vehicles: Analysis and Verification. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 23, 5 (2022), 4225--4235. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.3042973Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Matthias Lorenzen, Fabrizio Dabbene, Roberto Tempo, and Frank Allgöwer. 2016. Constraint-tightening and stability in stochastic model predictive control. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 62, 7 (2016), 3165--3177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. David Q Mayne. 2014. Model predictive control: Recent developments and future promise. Automatica 50, 12 (2014), 2967--2986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. David Q Mayne, James B Rawlings, Christopher V Rao, and Pierre OM Scokaert. 2000. Constrained model predictive control: Stability and optimality. Automatica 36, 6 (2000), 789--814.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Sahand Mosharafian and Javad Mohammadpour Velni. 2023. A hybrid stochastic model predictive design approach for cooperative adaptive cruise control in connected vehicle applications. Control Engineering Practice 130 (2023), 105383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Mehmet Fatih Ozkan and Yao Ma. 2022. Distributed Stochastic Model Predictive Control for Human-Leading Heavy-Duty Truck Platoon. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 23, 9 (2022), 16059--16071. https://doi.org/10. 1109/TITS.2022.3147719Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Vahab Rostampour and Tamás Keviczky. 2018. Distributed Stochastic Model Predictive Control Synthesis for Large-Scale Uncertain Linear Systems. In 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC). 2071--2077. https://doi.org/10.23919/ ACC.2018.8431452Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Meng Wang, Winnie Daamen, Serge P. Hoogendoorn, and Bart van Arem. 2016. Cooperative Car-Following Control: Distributed Algorithm and Impact on Moving Jam Features. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 17, 5 (2016), 1459--1471. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2015.2505674Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jianhua Yin, Dan Shen, Xiaoping Du, and Lingxi Li. 2022. Distributed Stochastic Model Predictive Control With Taguchi's Robustness for Vehicle Platooning. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 23, 9 (2022), 15967--15979. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2022.3146715Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Weiming Zhao, Dong Ngoduy, Simon Shepherd, Ronghui Liu, and Markos Papageorgiou. 2018. A platoon based cooperative eco-driving model for mixed automated and human-driven vehicles at a signalised intersection. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 95 (2018), 802--821.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Jianshan Zhou, Daxin Tian, Zhengguo Sheng, Xuting Duan, Guixian Qu, Dezong Zhao, Dongpu Cao, and Xuemin Shen. 2022. Robust min-max model predictive vehicle platooning with causal disturbance feedback. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 23, 9 (2022), 15878--15897.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Robust Car-Following Control of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles: A Stochastic Model Predictive Control Approach

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIVANet '23: Proceedings of the Int'l ACM Symposium on Design and Analysis of Intelligent Vehicular Networks and Applications
      October 2023
      129 pages
      ISBN:9798400703690
      DOI:10.1145/3616392

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 October 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate70of308submissions,23%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)76
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader