Abstract
The state of the art of system performance evaluation is reviewed and evaluation goals and problems are examined. Throughput, turnaround, and availability are defined as fundamental measures of performance; overhead and CPU speed are placed in perspective. The appropriateness of instruction mixes, kernels, simulators, and other tools is discussed, as well as pitfalls which may be encountered when using them. Analysis, simulation, and synthesis are presented as three levels of approach to evaluation, requiring successively greater amounts of information. The central role of measurement in performance evaluation and in the development of evaluation methods is explored.
- 1 ARBUCKLE, R.A. Computer analysis and thruput evaluation. Computers and Automation, 15, 1 (Jan. 1960), 12-19.Google Scholar
- 2 GOSDEN, J. A., .AND SISSON, R .L . Standardized comparisons of computer performance. Information Processing 1962; Proc. IFIP Congress 62. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1962, pp. 57-61.Google Scholar
- 3 HERMAN, D. J., AND IHRER, F. C. The use of a computer to evaluate computers. Proc. AFIPS 1964 Spring Joint Comput. Conf., Vol. 25, April, 1964, pp. 383-395.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4 RAICHELSON, E., AND COLLINS, G. A method for comparing the internal operating speeds of computers. Comm. ACM 7, 5 (May 1964), 309-310. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5 WHITE, P. Relative effects of central processor and inputoutput speeds upon throughput on the large computer. Comm. ACM 7, 12 (Dec. 1964), 711-714. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6 APPLE, C. T. The program monitor, a device for program performance measurement. Proe. ACM 20th Nat. Conf., August 1965, Publ. P-65, pp. 65-75. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7 SOLOMON, JR., M.B. Economies of scale and the IBM System 360. Comm. ACM 9, 6 (June 1966), 435-440. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- System performance evaluation: survey and appraisal
Recommendations
Performance evaluation of the PowerPC 620 microarchitecture
ISCA '95: Proceedings of the 22nd annual international symposium on Computer architectureThe PowerPC 620™ microprocessor is the most recent and performance leading member of the PowerPC™ family. The 64-bit PowerPC 620 microprocessor employs a two-phase branch prediction scheme, dynamic renaming for all the register files, ...
Performance comparison of ILP machines with cycle time evaluation
ISCA '96: Proceedings of the 23rd annual international symposium on Computer architectureMany studies have investigated performance improvement through exploiting instruction-level parallelism (ILP) with a particular architecture. Unfortunately, these studies indicate performance improvement using the number of cycles that are required to ...
Comments