skip to main content
10.1145/366173.366205acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnspwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Conduit cascades and secure synchronization

Published:20 February 2001Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.B Blakley and D.M. Kienzle. Some weaknesses of the TCB model. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. IEEE CS Press, May 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.R.E. Bryant. Symbolic boolean manipulation with ordered binary decision diagrams. A CM Computing Surveys, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.J.R. Burch et al. Symbolic model checking: 1023 states and beyond. Information and Computation, 98:142-170, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.J.A. Fitch and L.J Hoffman. A shortest path network security model. Computers and Security, 12:169-189, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.S.N. Foley. The specification and implementation of commercial security requirements including dynamic segregation of duties. In 4th A CM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. ACM Press, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.S.N. Foley and G. Hayes. PalmTE: Limited type enforcemented on the Palm handheld. In preparation, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.L. Gong and X. Qian. The complexity and composability of secure interoperation. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Security and Privacy, pages 190-200, Oakland, CA, May 1994. IEEE Computer Society Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.S. Gritalis and D. Spinellis. The cascade vulnerability problem: The detection problem and a simulated annealing approach to its correction. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 21(10):621- 628, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. 9.R.J. Horton et al. The cascade vulnerability problem. Journal of Computer Security, 2(4):279-290, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. 10.J.K Millen and M.W. Schwartz. The cascading problem for interconnected networks. In 4th Aerospace Computer Security Applications Conference, pages 269-273. IEEE CS Press, December 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. 11.I.S. Moskowitz and M.H. Kang. An insecurity flow model. In New Security Paradigms Workshop. ACM Press, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.National Computer Security Center, USA. Trusted Network Interpretation, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.M.K. Reiter and S.G. Stubblebine. Toward acceptable metrics of authentication. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pages 10- 20, May 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.J. M. Spivey. The Z Notation: A Reference Manual. Series in Computer Science. Prentice Hall International, second edition, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Conduit cascades and secure synchronization

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        NSPW '00: Proceedings of the 2000 workshop on New security paradigms
        February 2001
        168 pages
        ISBN:1581132603
        DOI:10.1145/366173

        Copyright © 2001 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 February 2001

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        NSPW '00 Paper Acceptance Rate15of35submissions,43%Overall Acceptance Rate62of170submissions,36%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader