Wenfei Fan
Gabriel M. Kuper
- 1.S. Abiteboul, R. Hull, and V. Vianu. Foundations of Databases. Addison-Wesley, 1995.]] Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2.C. Beeri and T. Milo. Schemas for integration and translation of structured and semi-structured data. In Proceedings of International Conference onDatabase Theory (ICDT), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Jerusalem, Israel, Jan. 1999.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.T. Bray, J. Paoli, and C. M. Sperberg-McQueen. Extensible markup language (XML) 1.0. W3C Recommendation, Feb. 1998. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/.]]Google Scholar
- 4.P. Buneman, S. Davidson, W. Fan, C. Hara, and W.-C. Tan. Keys for XML. in these proceedings., 2000.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5.P. Buneman, W. Fan, and S. Weinstein. Path constraints on semistructured and structured data. In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS), pages 129{138, Seattle, Washington, June 1998.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.R. G. G. Cattell and D. Barry, editors. The Object Data Standard: ODMG 3.0. Morgan Kaufmann, 2000.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.J. Clark and S. DeRose. XML path language (XPath). W3C Recommendation, Nov. 1999. http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath/.]]Google Scholar
- 8.S. Cluet, C. Delobel, J. Simeon, and K. Smaga. Your mediators need data conversion, In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), pages 177{188, Seattle, Washington, June 1998.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9.S. S. Cosmadakis, P. C. Kanellakis, and M. Y. Vardi. Polynomial-time implication problems for unary inclusion dependencies. Journal of the ACM, 37(1):15{46, Jan. 1990.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.W. Fan, G. M. Kuper, and J. Simeon. A unified constraint model for XML (full version), Feb. 2001.]]Google Scholar
- 11.W. Fan and L. Libkin. On XML integrity constraints in the presence of DTDs. In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS), Santa Barbara, CA, May 2001. to appear.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.W. Fan and J. Simeon. Integrity constraints for XML. In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS), Dallas, Texas, May 2000.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.P. Fankhauser, M. Fernandez, A. Malhotra, M. Rys, J. Simeon, and P. Wadler. The XML query algebra. W3C Working Draft, Feb. 2001. http://www.w3.org/TR/query-algebra/.]]Google Scholar
- 14.H. Hosoya and B. C. Pierce. XDuce: an XML processing language. In International Workshop on the Web and Databases (WebDB'2000), Dallas, Texas, May 2000.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15.G. M. Kuper and J. Simeon. Subsumption for XML types. In Proceedings of International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT), London, UK, Jan. 2001.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke. Database Management Systems. McGraw-Hill, 2000.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17.H. S. Thompson, D. Beech, M. Maloney, and N. Mendelsohn. XML schema part 1: Structures. W3C Working Draft, Feb. 2000.]]Google Scholar
Index Terms
- A unified constraint model for XML
Recommendations
A Conceptual Schema Based XML Schema with Integrity Constraints Checking
ICHIT '08: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Convergence and Hybrid Information TechnologyThe more popular XML for exchanging and representing information on Web, the more important Flat XML (XML) and intelligent editors become. For data exchanging, an XML Data with an XML Schema and integrity constraints are preferred. We employ an Object-...
Conceptual modeling of XML schemas
WIDM '03: Proceedings of the 5th ACM international workshop on Web information and data managementXML has become the standard format for representing structured and semi-structured data on the Web. To describe the structure and content of XML data, several XML schema languages have been proposed. Although being very useful for validating XML ...
Constraint Preserving Transformation from Relational Schema to XML Schema
XML has become the standard for publishing and exchanging data on the Web. However, most business data is managed and will remain to be managed by relational database management systems. As such, there is an increasing need to efficiently and accurately ...
Comments