skip to main content
10.1145/378344.378350acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

BLUE: an alternative approach to active queue management

Published:01 January 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper exposes an inherent weakness in current active queue manage ment techniques such asRedin that they rely on queue lengths to indicate the severity of congestion. In light of this observation, a fundamentally different active queue management algorithm calledBlueis proposed.Blueuses packet loss and link utilization to manage congestion. Using simulation and controlled experiments,Blueis shown to significantly outperformRedin providing lower packet loss rates and smaller queuing delays to networked applications such as interactive audio and video.

References

  1. 1.F. Anjum and L. Tassiulas. An Algorithm to Achieve Fairness in the Internet. University of Maryland Techreport TR 99-17, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.H. Balakrishnan, V. Padmanabhan, S. Seshan, M. Stemm, and R. Katz. TCP Behavior of a Busy Internet Server: Analysis and Improvements. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, March 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. 3.R. Braden, D. Clark, J. Crowcroft, B. Davie, S. Deering, D. Estrin, S. Floyd, V. Jacobson, G. Minshall, C. Partridge, L. Peterson, K. Ramakrishnan, S. Shenker, J. Wroclawski, and L. Zhang. Recommendations on Queue Management and Congestion Avoidance in the Internet. RFC 2309, April 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.K. Cho. A Framework for Alternate Queueing: Towards Traffic Management by PC-UNIX Based Routers. USENIX 1998 Annual Technical Conference, June 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.M. Christiansen, K. Jeffy, D. Ott, and F. Smith. Tuning RED for Web Traffic. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, September 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.I. Cidon, R. Guerin, and A. Khamisy. Protective Buffer Management Policies. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2(3), June 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.S. Doran. RED Experience and Differentiated Queueing. In NANOG Meeting, June 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.W. Feng, D. Kandlur, D. Saha, and K. Shin. Techniques for Eliminating Packet Loss in Congested TCP/IP Networks. In UM CSE-TR-349-97, October 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.W. Feng, D. Kandlur, D. Saha, and K. Shin. A Self-Configuring RED Gateway. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, March 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. 10.W. Feng, D. Kandlur, D. Saha, and K. Shin. Blue: A New Class of Active Queue Management Algorithms. In UM CSE-TR-387-99, April 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.S. Floyd. TCP and Explicit Congestion Notification. Computer Communication Review, 24(5):10-23, October 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.S. Floyd and V. Jacobson. Random Early Detection Gateways for Congestion Avoidance. ACM/IEEE Transactions on Networking, 1(4):397-413, August 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.V. Jacobson. Congestion Avoidance and Control. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, pages 314-329, August 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.M. May, J. Bolot, C. Diot, and B. Lyles. Reasons Not to Deploy RED. InIWQoS, March 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. 15.S. McCanne and S. Floyd. http://www-nrg.ee.lbl.gov/ns/. ns-LBNL Network Simulator, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Netperf. The Public Netperf Homepage: http://www.netperf.org/. 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.T. Ott, T. Lakshman, and L. Wong. SRED: Stabilized RED. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, March 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. 18.V. Paxson. End-to-End Internet Packet Dynamics. In Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM, September 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.K. K. Ramakrishan and R. Jain. A Binary Feedback Scheme for Congestion Avoidance in Computer Networks. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 8(2):158-181, May 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.K. Ramakrishnan and S. Floyd. A Proposal to Add Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP. RFC 2481, January 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.C. Villamizar and C. Song. High Performance TCP in ANSNET. Computer Communication Review, 24(5):45-60, October 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. BLUE: an alternative approach to active queue management

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        NOSSDAV '01: Proceedings of the 11th international workshop on Network and operating systems support for digital audio and video
        January 2001
        187 pages
        ISBN:1581133707
        DOI:10.1145/378344

        Copyright © 2001 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 January 2001

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate118of363submissions,33%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader