skip to main content
10.1145/379437.379504acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Database selection for processing k nearest neighbors queries in distributed environments

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 January 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

We consider the processing of digital library queries, consisting of a text component and a structured component in distributed environments. The text component can be processed using techniques given in previous papers such as [7, 8, 11]. In this paper, we concentrate on the processing of the structured component of a distributed query. Histograms are constructed and algorithms are given to provide estimates of the desirabilities of the databases with respect to the given query. Databases are selected in descending order of desirability. An algorithm is also given to select tuples from the selected databases. Experimental results are given to show that the techniques provided here are effective and efficient.

References

  1. 1.M. Carey and D. Kossmann. On Saying "Enough Already" in SQL, Proc. of ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Tucson, Arizona, May 1997, pp. 219-230 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.M. Carey and D. Kossmann. Reducing the Braking Distance of an SQL Query Engine, Proc. of 24th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, New York City, August 1998, pp. 158-169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.S. Chaudhuri and L. Gravano. Evaluating Top-k Selection queries, Proc. of 25th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Edinburgh, Scotland, September 1999, pp. 397-410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.D. Donjerkovic and R. Ramakrishnan. Probabilistic Optimization of Top N Queries, Proc. of 25th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Edinburgh, Scotland, September 1999, pp. 411-422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.R. Fagin. Combining fuzzy Information from Multiple Systems, Proc. of ACM Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, Montreal, Quebec, 1996, pp. 216-2226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.J. French, E. Fox, K. Maly, and A. Selman. Wide Area Technical Report Service: Technical Report Online. Communications of the ACM, 38, 4, April 1995, pp. 45-46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.S. Gauch, G. Wang, and M. Gomez. Profusion: Intelligent Fusion from Multiple, Distributed Search Engines, Journal of Universal Computer Science, 2, 9, 1996, pp. 637-649.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.L. Gravano and H. Garcia-Molina. Generalizing GlOSS to Vector-Space databases and Broker Hierarchies, Proc. of 21st International Conferences on Very Large Data Bases, Zurich, Switzerland, September 1995, pp. 78-89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Y. Ioannidis and V. Poosala. Histogram-based Approximation of Set-valued Query Answers, Proc.of 25th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Edinburgh, Scotland, September 1999, pp. 174-185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.A. Konig and G. Weikum. Combining Histograms and Parametric Curve Fitting for Feedback-Driven Query Result-Size Estimation. Proc. of 25th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Edinburgh, Scotland, September 1999, pp. 423-434. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.K. Liu, C. Yu, W. Meng, W. Wu and N. Rishe, A Statistical Method for Estimating the Usefulness of Text databases, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, (to appear). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.W. Meng, K. Liu, C. Yu, X. Wang, Y. Chang, N. Rishe. Determine Text Databases to Search in the Internet. Proc. of 24th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, New York City, August 1998, pp. 14-25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.Networked Computer Science Technical Reference Library (http://cs-tr.cs.cornell.edu/).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.C. Yu, K. Liu, W. Meng, Z. Wu, and N. Rishe. A Methodology to Retrieve Text Documents from Multiple Databases. IEEETransactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (to appear). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.C. Yu, W. Sun, S. Dao, and D. Keirsey. Determining relationships among attributes for Interoperability of Multidatabase Systems. Proc. of the 1st International Workshop on Interoperability in Multidatabase Systems, Kyoto, Japan, April 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Database selection for processing k nearest neighbors queries in distributed environments

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              JCDL '01: Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
              January 2001
              481 pages
              ISBN:1581133456
              DOI:10.1145/379437

              Copyright © 2001 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 January 2001

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              JCDL '01 Paper Acceptance Rate76of250submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader