skip to main content
10.1145/505388.505410acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesispdConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

On convergence of switching windows computation in presence of crosstalk noise

Published:07 April 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

Detecting overlapping of switching windows between coupling nets is a major static technique to accurately locate crosstalk noise. However, due to the mutual dependency between switching windows, the computation requires iterations to converge. In this paper, we discuss the issues and provide answers to the important questions involved in convergence and numerical properties, including the effect of coupling models, multiple convergence points, convergence rate, computational complexity, non-monotonicity, continuity and the effectiveness of bounds. Numerical fixed point computation results are used to explain these properties. Our contribution here builds a theoretical foundation for static crosstalk noise analysis.

References

  1. R. Levy, et al. "Clarinet: A noise analysis tool for deep submicron design". In Proc. of Design Automation Conference, pp. 233--238, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Kumar. "Interconnect and Noise Immunity Design for Pentium 4 Processor". In Intel Reports downloaded from http://developer.intel.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S. S. Sapatnekar. "On the Chicken-and-Egg Problem of Determining the Effect of Crosstalk on Delay in Integrated Circuits". In Proc. IEEE of 8th Topical Meeting on Electrical Performance of Eletronic Package, pp. 245--248, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. B.Franzini, et al. "Crosstalk Aware Static Timing Analysis:a Two Step Approach". In Prof. of ISQED, pp. 499--503, Mar. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. P. F. Tehrani, et al. "Deep Sub-Micron Static Timing Analysis in Presence of Crosstalk". In Proc. of ISQED, pp. 505--512, Mar. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. R. Arunachalam, et al. "TACO: timing analysis with coupling". In Proc. of DAC, pp. 266--269, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Chen, D. A. Kirkpatrick, and K. Keutzer. "Switching Window Computation for Static Timing Analysis in Presence of Crosstalk Noise". In Proc. of ICCAD, pp. 331--337, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. T. Xiao, et al. "Efficient static timing analysis in presence of crosstalk". In Proc. of IEEE International ASIC/SOC Conference, pp. 335--339, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. H. Zhou, et al. "Timing Analysis with Crosstalk as Fixpoints on Complete Lattice". In Proc. of DAC, pp. 714--719, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. G. Engeln-Mülleges and F. Uhlig. "Numerical Algorithms with C". Springer-Verlag, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P. D. Gross, et al. "Determination of Worst-Case Aggressor Alignment for Delay Calculation". In Proc. of ICCAD, pp. 212--219, Nov. 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. S. Sapatnekar. "A timing model incorporating the effect of crosstalk on delay and its application to optimal channel routing". IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design, Vol.19:pp.550--559, May 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. B. Kahng, et al. "On Switch Factor Based Analysis of Coupled RC Interconnects". In Proc. of DAC, pp. 79--84, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. P. Chen, et al. "Miller Factor for Gate-Level Coupling Delay Calculation". In Proc. of ICCAD, pp. 68--74, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. K. L. Shepard, et al. "Global Harmony: Coupled Noise Analysis for Full-Chip RC Interconnect Networks". In Proc. of ICCAD, pp. 139--146, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. T. Xiao and M. Marek-Sadowska. "Worst delay estimation in crosstalk aware static timing analysis". In Proc. of IEEE ICCD, pp. 115--120, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. L. H. Chen and M. Marek-Sadowska. "Aggressor Alignment for Worst-Case Crosstalk Noise". IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design, Vol.20:pp.612--621, May 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. S. Devadas, et al. "Computation of floating mode delay in combinational networks: Theory and algorithms". IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, Vol.12:pp.1913--1923, Dec. 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. On convergence of switching windows computation in presence of crosstalk noise

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ISPD '02: Proceedings of the 2002 international symposium on Physical design
      April 2002
      216 pages
      ISBN:1581134606
      DOI:10.1145/505388

      Copyright © 2002 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 April 2002

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate62of172submissions,36%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader