Steven S. Curl
Abstract
This research seeks to understand to what extent leveraging the graphical user interface's ability to convey spatial information can improve a user's ability to write effective database queries. This capability is believed to be especially important when nontechnical individuals, with diverse backgrounds and cognitive abilities, are expected to interact directly with these systems in the query formulation process.This study makes use of recent developments in graphical user interface technology to manipulate the level of spatial visualization support provided by the interface. A laboratory experiment was conducted to explore the influence of interface style and the spatial visualization ability of the user on the performance of the query development process. The application used in the experiment was a visual database query system developed for this study. One hundred sixty-two volunteers participated in the experiment. Spatial visualization ability was assessed using a paper-folding test. The results indicate that both spatial visualization support of the system and spatial visualization ability of the user are important components of database usability.
- Alter, S. (1992). Information Systems: A Management Perspective, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 19-31. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Batra, D., Hoffer, J., and Bostrom, R. (1990). "Comparing Representations with Relational and EER Models," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 126-139. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Borgman, C. L. (1989). "All Users of Information Retrieval Systems Are Not Created Equal: An Exploration of Individual Differences," Information Processing & Management, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 237-251. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carroll, J. (1974). "Psychometric Tests as Cognitive Tasks: A New 'Structure of Intellect'," Research Bulletin, Vol. 74 No. 16, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
- Chan, H. C., Wei, K. K., and Siau, K. L. (1993). "User-Database Interface: The Effect of Abstraction Levels on Query Performance," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 441-459.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Davis, S. A., and Bostrom, R. P. (1993). "Training End-Users: An Experimental Investigation of the Roles of the Computer Interface and Training Methods," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 61-85.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dumais, S. T., and Wright, A. L. (1986). "Reference by Name vs. Location in a Computer Filing System," Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, pp. 824-828.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Egan, D. E. (1988). "Individual Differences in Human-Computer Interaction," in M. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.Google Scholar
- Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., and Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
- Greene, S. L., Gomez, L. M., and Devlin, S. J. (1986). "A Cognitive Analysis of Database Query Production," Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, pp. 9-13.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Helander, M. (Ed.) (1988). Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hutchins, E. L., Hollan, J. D., and Norman, D. A. (1986). "Direct Manipulation Interfaces," in D. A. Norman and S. W. Draper (Eds.), User Centered System Design --- New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, pp. 87-124.Google Scholar
- Jih, W., Bradbard, D., Snyder, C., and Thompson, N. (1989). "The Effects of Relational and Entity-Relationship Data Models on Query Performance of End Users," International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 31, pp. 257-267. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kirk, J. (1982). Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edition, Belmont, CA: Brooks Cole Publishing.Google Scholar
- Klerer, M. (1984). "Experimental Study of A Two-Dimensional Language vs Fortran for First Course Programmers," International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 20, pp. 445-467. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McKenney, J. L., and Keen, P. G. W. (1974). "How Managers' Minds Work," Harvard Business Review, pp. 79-90.Google Scholar
- Salvendy, G. and Knight, J. L. (1982). "Psychomotor Work Capabilities," in G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial Engineering, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Satzinger, John W. (1991). User Interface Consistency Across End User Applications: Effect on Learning and Satisfaction, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The Claremont Graduate School. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- An investigation of the roles of individual differences and user interface on database usability
Recommendations
User-process model approach to improve user interface usability: Book Reviews
Our purpose in this study is to inductively reorganize software interface menu items based on a user's process model. The proposed menu interface in this study used direct users' input, such as goals and strategies for solving their information needs, ...
Technophobia and user interface usability
This paper aims to explore the relationship between the usability of interfaces and the experience of technophobia. This study hypothesises that an unusable interface will influence user feelings of technophobia. Three hypotheses were formulated by ...
Usability evaluation of web-based GIS: case study
iiWAS '09: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & ServicesDependency of the majority of mankind activities on information and communication technologies in general and on geographic information is increasing rapidly. This is one of the reasons why usability of specialized software tools (GIS) belongs today to ...
Comments