skip to main content
10.1145/508791.508846acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A conceptual framework for testing biometric algorithms within operating systems' authentication

Published:11 March 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a conceptual framework for testing the implementation of biometric algorithms within Unix and Windows NT/2000 operating systems' login authentication. To support the analysis and evaluation of biometric algorithms, a data logging module will be used, enabling the collection of quantitative data, e.g. timestamps, biometric raw data, (pre)processed data, and return codes from each run of a biometric authentication. It is shown how biometric algorithms and a data logging module can be integrated into Unix and Windows NT/2000. In addition to the explained system components a human observer is necessary to collect extended data like user behavior and environmental conditions, which cannot be automatically recorded by the data logging module. From the combination of these two types of data, conclusions on the biometric algorithm in the context of its implementation in operating systems' authentication can be drawn. The resulting benefits for the development of appropriate biometric algorithms concerning aspects of robustness (security, safety), performance measures and usability will be discussed for iris-biometrics.

References

  1. Microsoft Developer's Library. http://msdn.microsoft.com, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Biometrics Working Group (BWG): Best Practices in Testing and Reporting Performance of Biometric Devices, Version 1.0, http://www.cesg.gov.uk/biometrics/, January 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Brömme. A Discussion on Privacy Needs and (Mis)Use of Biometric IT-Systems. In Proceedings of the IFIP WG 9.6/11.7 Working Conference on Security and Control of IT in Society (SCITS-II), 15-16 June 2001, Bratislava, Slovakia, pages 145-156, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. F. Büllingen and A. Hillebrand. Vergleichende Untersuchung biometrischer Identifikationssysteme (BIOIS) - Teiluntersuchung Technikfolgen-Abschätzung. Technical report, Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI) und Frauenhofer Institut für Graphische Datenverarbeitung (IGD), March 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI). Studie BIOIS: Vergleichende Untersuchung biometrischer Identifikationssysteme - Technische Untersuchung, Offener Abschlussbericht, May 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. G. Daugman. Recognizing Persons by their Iris-Patterns. In {8}, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. W. M. E. Hart. Adler's Physiology of the Eye - Clinical Application. Mosby-Year Book Inc., 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. K. Jain, R. Bolle, and S. E. Pankanti. Biometrics-Personal Identification in Networked Society. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. T. Klein. Linux-Sicherheit: Security mit Open-Source-Software. dpunkt-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Kronberg. Implementation eines biometrischen Authentisierungssystems in Windows NT. Master's thesis, Supervisors: K. Brunnstein and A. Brömme. Faculty of Informatics, University of Hamburg, AGN, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. G. E. Lassmann. Bewertungskriterien zur Vergleichbarkeit biometrischer Verfahren - Kriterienkatalog. Technical report, Arbeitsgruppe 6: Biometrische Identifikationsverfahren, TeleTrust Deutschland e.V., August 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. T. Mansfield, G. Kelly, D. Chandler, and J. Kane. Biometric Product Testing Final Report. Technical report, Centre for Mathematics and Scientific Computing, National Physical Laboratory, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D. Polemi. Biometric Techniques: Review and Evaluation of Biometric Techniques for Identification and Authentication - Final Report. Technical report, Institute of Communication and Computer Systems, National Technical University of Athens, April 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. V. Samar and C. Lai. Making Login Services Independent of Authentication Technologies. Technical report, SunSoft, Inc., 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. V. Samar and R. J. Schemers. Unified Login with Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAM). Technical report, SunSoft, Inc., 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. R. E. Walsh. Single Sign-On in Windows NT, 2000 & The Solaris Operating Environment: A Review. Technical report, Sun Laboratories, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. L. E. Wayman. National Biometric Test Center - Collected Works 1997-2000, August 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. D. D. Zhang. Automated Biometrics - Technologies and Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A conceptual framework for testing biometric algorithms within operating systems' authentication

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SAC '02: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM symposium on Applied computing
          March 2002
          1200 pages
          ISBN:1581134452
          DOI:10.1145/508791

          Copyright © 2002 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 March 2002

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader