ABSTRACT
ICANN was created 3 years ago as a unique experiment in Internet self-governance. Could a private, non-government, global organization coordinate critical Internet naming and numbering functions in a legitimate way? Increasingly, critics complain that ICANN has not fulfilled it's promise. This panel debate will examine whether ICANN's vision of bottom-up global self-governance for the Internet is a myth or a reality.
Index Terms
- ICANN in Year 3
Recommendations
ICANN's TLD Plans Are Defined, Not Yet Refined
The ICANN board of directors' recent decisions to greatly expand the number of generic Top-Level Domains (gTLDs) and fast-track some country-code TLDs (ccTLDs) using internationalized characters illustrates that ICANN has stumbled into a quagmire; that ...
Investigating Moral Disengagement Among First-Year Engineering Students
2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)In this Research Full Paper, we investigate moral disengagement among first-year engineering students. Current engineering ethics education typically assumes that providing information about what is ethical (i.e., as explicated in ethical codes) and ...
ICANN -- EU can't: Internet governance and Europe's role in the formation of the Internet Corporation for assigned names and numbers (ICANN)
Special issue: Regulating the internet: EU and US perspectivesThis paper analyzes the policy process that led to the formation of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), focusing on the actions of the European Commission. The analysis of the relevant documents shows the difference between ...
Comments