skip to main content
10.1145/544741.544779acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Caching in multi-unit combinatorial auctions

Published:15 July 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

Combinatorial Auctions are preferable to traditional (sequential) auctions since they allow bidders to express complementarity and substitutability relationships between items, and hence may enhance economic efficiency. However, in such auctions, the problem of determining the optimal winning bids is \textitNP-hard in the general case. In a recent paper, Leyton-Brown et al. have proposed an algorithm for computing the winners in a multi-unit combinatorial auction. It is a branch and bound algorithm that makes use of a caching technique. In this note, we present a counterexample to show that caching, as described by the authors, may fail and the algorithm may eventually give a suboptimal solution. We discuss why it fails and propose how it could be fixed and properly used in a General (multi-unit) combinatorial auction.

References

  1. Fujishima, Y., Leyton-Brown, K., Shoham, Y. 1999. Taming the computational complexity of combinatorial auctions: optimal and approximate approaches. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint conference on Artificial intelligence, IJCAI-99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Leyton-Brown, K., Shoham, Y., and Tennenholtz, M. 2000. An algorithm for Multi-unit Combinatorial Auctions. AAAI-00. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Nisan, N. 1999. Bidding and allocation in combinatorial auctions. Working paper.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Rothkopf, M. H., pekêc, A., and Harstad, R., M. 1998. Computationally manageable combinatorial auctions Management Science. 44,8 (August), 1131--1147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Sandholm, T. 1999. An algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions In Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint conference on Artificial intelligence, IJCAI-99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Sandholm, T. 2000. Approaches to Winner Determination in Combinatorial Auctions Decision Support Systems. 28,1--2, 165--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Sandholm, T., and Suri. S. 2000. Improved Algorithms for Optimal Winner Determination in Combinatorial Auctions and Generalizations National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Vries, S., and Vohra, R. 2001. Combinatorial Auctions: A Survey. Unpublished manuscript. (http://www-m9.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/devries).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Caching in multi-unit combinatorial auctions

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          AAMAS '02: Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: part 1
          July 2002
          540 pages
          ISBN:1581134800
          DOI:10.1145/544741

          Copyright © 2002 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 15 July 2002

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,155of5,036submissions,23%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader