Lecia Jane Barker
ABSTRACT
As part of an NSF-funded IT Workforce grant, the authors conducted ethnographic research to provide deep understanding of the learning environment of computer science classrooms. Categories emerging from data analysis included 1) impersonal environment and guarded behavior; and 2) the creation and maintenance of informal hierarchy resulting in competitive behaviors. These communication patterns lead to a defensive climate, characterized by competitiveness rather cooperation, judgments about others, superiority, and neutrality rather than empathy. The authors identify particular and recognizable types of discourse, which, when prevalent in a classroom, can preclude the development of a collaborative and supportive learning environment.
- Burke, K. Language as Symbolic Action. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1966.Google Scholar
- Burrell G. and Morgan G. Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd., 1979.Google Scholar
- Button, G. and Sharrock, W. (1996) Project Work: The Organization of Collaborative Design and Development in Software Engineering. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, Vol. 5, (1996), pp 369-386. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Derlega, V. J. Self-Disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993.Google Scholar
- Fulton, R. D. A Conceptual Model for Understanding the Physical Attributes of Learning Environments. In R. Hiemstra, (Ed.) Creative Environments for Effective Adult Learning, San Franscisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1991, pp. 13-22.Google Scholar
- Gibb, J. R. Defensive Communication. Journal of Communication, Vol. 11-12, 1961, pp. 141-148.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gilligan, C. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
- Hiemstra, R. (Ed.) Aspects of Effective Learning Environments. Creative Environments for Effective Adult Learning, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991, pp. 5-12.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, M. M. Generalizing from single case studies. Evaluation Quarterly, 3(4), 661-669, 1979.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tannen, D. The Display of (Gendered) Identities in Talk at Work. Reinventing Identities: The Gendered Self in Discourse, ed. by Mary Bucholtz, A. C. Liang, and Laurel A. Sutton, pp. 221-240. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
- Vahala, M. E. and Winston, R. B. College Classroom Environments: Disciplinary and Institutional-Type Differences and Effects on Academic Achievement in Introductory Courses. Innovative Higher Education, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1994, pp. 99-121.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., and Jackson, D. Pragmatics of Human Communication, New York: W.W. Norton, 1967.Google Scholar
- Defensive climate in the computer science classroom
Recommendations
Inquiry-Based Learning in Computer Science Classroom
Informatics in Schools. New Ideas in School InformaticsAbstractInquiry-based learning in Slovak schools is still considered to be an innovative approach to teaching based on the active exploration of new knowledge by pupils themselves. It allows deeper involvement of pupils in the learning process, encourages ...
Challenges of a Computer Science Classroom: Initial Perspectives from Teachers
WiPSCE '15: Proceedings of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing EducationIn spite of the increasing demand for professionals with computing experience in the workforce, computer science plays only a minor role in K-12 education. To meet the CS10K goal of training thousands of teachers to teach a new CS principles (CSP) ...
Opening the door of the computer science classroom: the disciplinary commons
SIGCSE '07: Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science educationThe Disciplinary Commons project had two primary objectives: to document and share knowledge about teaching and student learning in Computer Science (CS) classrooms, and to establish practices for the scholarship of teaching by making it public, peer-...
Comments