skip to main content
10.1145/564376.564443acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The relationship between ASK and relevance criteria

Published:11 August 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

No abstract available.

References

  1. Barry, C. & Schamber, L. (1998). Users' criteria for relevance evaluation: A cross-situational comparison. Information Processing and Management, 34 (2/3), 219--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bateman, J. (1999). Modeling the importance of end-user relevance criteria. Proceedings of the 62nd ASIS Annual Meeting, 36, 396--406.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Belkin, N.J. (1980). Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. Canadian Journal of Information Science, 5, 133--143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Belkin, N.J. & Kwasnik, B. (1986). Using structural representations of anomalous states of knowledge for choosing document retrieval strategies. Proceedings of 1986 ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Pisa, Italy, 11--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Belkin, N.J., Oddy, R.N., & Brooks, H.M. (1982). ASK for information retrieval, Part II. Results of a design study. Journal of Documentation, 38 (2), 145--167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Cool, C., Belkin, N.J., Frieder, O. & Kantor, P. (1993) Characteristics of texts affecting relevance judgments. In M.E. Williams, ed. Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Online Meeting. Medford, NJ, Learned Information, Inc: 77--83Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hapeshi, K. & Belkin, N.J. (1985). Developing and evaluating a automatic on-line information retrieval system based on user problem statements. Proceedings of RIAO '85, Grenoble, France, I.M.A.G., 681--698.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Schamber, L., Eisenberg, M, & Nilan, M. (1990). A re-examination of relevance: Toward a dynamic, situational definition. Information Processing and Management, 26, 775--776. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Schamber, L. & Bateman, J. (1996). User criteria in relevance evaluation: Toward development of a measurement scale. Proceedings of the 59th ASIS Annual Meeting, 33, 218--225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Spink, A. & Saracevic, T. (1997). Interactive information retrieval: Sources and effectiveness of search terms during mediated online searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(8), 741--761 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The relationship between ASK and relevance criteria

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '02: Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
      August 2002
      478 pages
      ISBN:1581135610
      DOI:10.1145/564376

      Copyright © 2002 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 August 2002

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGIR '02 Paper Acceptance Rate44of219submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader