skip to main content
10.1145/568760.568829acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessekeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Analysing primary and lower order project success drivers

Published:15 July 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

Project success is influenced by many factors. Some are primary drivers of project success, others secondary. However, these secondary factors may be no less important to understand and learn from than the primary factors. In addition, project success drivers are often qualitative and subjective, eluding analysis through traditional statistical methods. This paper presents a method that analyses the influence and nature of primary and lower order project success drivers. A case study illustrates the usefulness of this analysis and the additional understanding gained from including lower order success drivers in the analysis. The method extends existing work that has been restricted to primary drivers.

References

  1. Allen M., and Yeh W., "Introduction to Measurement Theory", Brooks/Cole Publishing, 1979.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Altman D., "Practical Statistics for Medical Research", Chapman-Hall, 1991.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Basili V., Zelkovitz M., McGarry F., Page J., Waligora S., and Pajerski R., "SEL's Software Process-Improvement Program", IEEE Software, November pp. 83-87, 1995.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Boehm, B., "Software Engineering Economics", Englewood Cliffs, N.J., USA, Prentice-Hall, 1981.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Briand L., El Emam K., and Morasca S.,"On the Application of Measurement Theory in Software Engineering", Journal of Empirical Software Engineering, Vol. 1. No.1: 61-88, 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. El Emam K., "Benchmarking Kappa for Software Process Assessment Reliability Studies", Empirical Software Engineering: An International Journal, Vol. 4, No. 4: 113-133, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gray A. R., MacDonell S. G., and Shepperd M. J.,"Factors Systematically Associated with Errors in Subjective Estimates of Software Development Effort: The Stability of Expert Judgement", Proc. of the Sixth Int. Software Metrics Symposium, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp. 216-227, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hughes R., "Expert Judgement as an Estimation Method", Information and Software Technology, Vol. 38, pp. 67-75, 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Höst M., and Wohlin C., "An Experimental Study of Individual Subjective Effort Estimations and Combinations of the Estimates", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Software Engineering, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 332-339, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kachigan S. K., "Statistical Analysis---An Interdisciplinary Introduction to Univariate & Multivariate Methods", Radius Press, 1986.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Khoshgoftaar T. M., and Lanning D. L.,"Are the Principal Components of Software Complexity Stable Across Software Products?", Proc. of the Int. Symposium on Software Metrics, London, United Kingdom, pp. 61-72, 1994.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Khoshgoftaar T. M., Allen E. B., Kalaichelvan K. S., Goel N., Hudepohl J. P., and Mayrand J.,"Detection of Fault-Prone Program Modules in a Very Large Telecommunications System", Proc. of the Int. Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, Toulouse, France, pp. 24-33, 1995.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ohlsson M. C., von Mayrhauser A., McGuire B., and Wohlin C., "Code Decay Analysis of Legacy Software through Successive Releases", Proc. IEEE Aerospace Conf., Snowmass, Colorado, USA, 1999.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Ropponen J., and Lyytinen K.,"Components of Software Development Risk: How to Address Them? A Project Manager Survey", IEEE Trans. in Software Engineering, Vol. 26, No. 2: 98-112, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Valett J. D., "The (Mis)use of Subjective Process Measures in Software Engineering", Proc. Software Engineering Workshop, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA, pp. 161-165, 1993.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. von Mayrhauser, A., Wohlin, C. and Ohlsson, M. C., "Assessing and Understanding Efficiency and Success in Software Production", Empirical Software Engineering: An International Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 125-154, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Wohlin C., and Ahlgren M., "Soft Factors and Their Impact on Time to Market", Software Quality Journal, No. 4: 189-205, 1995.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Wohlin, C. and Amschler Andrews, A., "Assessing Project Success using Subjective Evaluation Factors", Software Quality Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 43-70, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Wohlin C., von Mayrhauser A., Höt M., and Regnell B., "Subjective Evaluation as a Tool for Learning from Software Project Success", Information and Software Technology, Vol. 42, No. 14: 983-992, 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Analysing primary and lower order project success drivers

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            SEKE '02: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Software engineering and knowledge engineering
            July 2002
            859 pages
            ISBN:1581135564
            DOI:10.1145/568760

            Copyright © 2002 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 15 July 2002

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader