skip to main content
article

Effects of scent and breadth on use of site-specific search on e-commerce Web sites

Published:01 September 2003Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Users faced with Web sites containing many possibly relevant pages often have a decision to make about navigation: use the menu of links or use the provided site search function. Two studies were conducted to examine what users do when faced with this decision on e-commerce Web sites, and how users go about deciding which method to attempt. An exploratory study revealed a wide distribution of searching and browsing behavior across sites and users. Counter to some predictions, use of the site search functions did not yield faster or more accurate performance in locating products. Questionnaire data suggested that factors relevant to the menu structure, interface element prominence, information scent and user dispositions all influenced the decision of whether to browse or search a site for a product. A second experiment utilizing novel e-commerce sites and allowing for more control of factors found to be important in the first study found that browsing behavior was influenced by both the breadth and information scent of the menus. These results suggest that providing site search should not be used to compensate for poor menu design, and provide further evidence regarding the design of effective menu structures.

References

  1. Blackmon, M. H., Polson, P. G., Kitajima, M., and Lewis, C. 2002. Cognitive Walkthrough for the Web, In Human Factors in Computing Systems: Proceedings of CHI 2002. ACM, New York, 463--470. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Byrne, M. D., John, B. E., Wehrle, N. S., and Crow, D. C. 1999. The tangled web we wove: A taskonomy of WWW use. In Human Factors in Computing Systems: Proceedings of CHI 99. ACM, New York, 544--551. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Campagnoni, F. R. and Ehrlich, K. 1989. Information retrieval using a hypertext-based help system. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, New York, 212--220. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Card, S. K., Pirolli, P., Wege, M. V. D., Morrison, J. B., Reeder, R. W., Schraedley, P. K., and Boshart, J. 2001. Information scent as a driver of Web behavior graphs: Results of a protocol analysis method for Web usability. In Human Factors in Computing Systems: Proceedings of CHI 2001. ACM, New York, 498--505. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chi, E. H., Pirolli, P., and Pitkow, J. 2000. The scent of a site: A system for analyzing and predicting information scent, usage, and usability of a Web site. In Human Factors in Computing Systems: Proceedings of CHI 2000. ACM, New York, 161--168. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S., Furnas, G., Landauer, T., and Harshman, R. 1990. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 41, 391--407.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans, G. W. 1980. Environmental cognition. Psych. Bull. 88, 259--287.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Golledge, R. G., Smith, T. R., Pellegrino, J. W., Doherty, S., and Marshall, S. P. 1985. A conceptual model and empirical analysis of children's acquisition of spatial knowledge. J. Exper. Psych. 5, 125--152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kleinmuntz, D. N. and Schkade, D. A. 1993. Information displays and decision processes. Psych. Sci. 4(4), 221--227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Koman, R. 1998. The scent of information: Helping users find their way by making your site "smelly." http://webreview.com/wr/pub/98/05/15/feature/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Landauer, T., Foltz, P., and Laham, D. 1998. Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259--284.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Larson, K. and Czerwinski, M. 1998. Web page design: Implications of memory, structure, and scent for information retrieval. In Human Factors in Computing Systems: Proceedings of CHI 98. ACM, New York, 25--32. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lohse, G. L. and Spiller, P. 1998. Quantifying the effect of user interface design features on cyberstore traffic and sales. In Human Factors in Computing Systems: Proceedings of CHI 98. ACM, New York, 211--218. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Marchionini, G. 1989. Making the transition from print to electronic encyclopedias: Adaptation of mental models. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 30, 591--618. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nielsen, J. 2000. Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis, IN. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nisbett, R. and Wilson, T. 1977. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psych. Rev. 84(3), 231--259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Norman, K. L. 1991. The psychology of menu selection: Designing cognitive control at the human/computer interface. Ablex, Norwood, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., and Johnson, E. J. 1993. The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pirolli, P. 1997. Computational models of information scent-following in a very large browsable text collection. In Human Factors in Computing Systems: Proceedings of CHI 97. ACM, New York, 3--10. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pirolli, P. and Card, S. 1995. Information foraging in information access environments. In Human Factors in Computing Systems: Proceedings of CHI 95. ACM, New York, 51--58. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Pirolli, P. and Card, S. 1999. Information foraging. Psych. Rev. 106(4), 643--675.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Powell, T. A. 2000. The complete reference: Web design. Berkeley, CA: Osborne/McGraw-Hill. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Rada, R. and Murphy, C. 1992. Searching versus browsing in hypertext. Hypermedia, 4(1), 1--30. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sanderson, P. M., Mcneese, M. D., and Zaff, B. S. 1994. Handling complex real-world data with two cognitive engineering tools: COGENT and MacSHAPA. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 26(2), 117--124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sawyer, P. 2000. Links that give off scent. User Interface Engineering, Inc. Report. North Andover, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Scanlon, T. 2000. On-site searching and scent. User Interface Engineering, Inc. Report. North Andover, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Schamber, L., Eisenberg, M. B., and Nilan, M. S. 1990. A re-examination of relevance: Towards a dynamic situational definition. Information Processing and Management, 26, 755--776. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Sellen, A. J., Murphy, R., and Shaw, K. L. 2002. How Knowledge Workers Use the Web, In Human Factors in Computing Systems: Proceedings of CHI 2002. ACM, New York, 227--234. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Spool, J. 2001. Are there users who always search? http://world.std.com/∼uieweb/always.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Spool, J. M. and Klee, M. 2000. Designing for scent. North Andover, MA: User Interface Engineering, Inc. Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Soto, R. 1999. Learning and performing by exploration: Label quality measured by latent semantic analysis. In Human Factors in Computing Systems: Proceedings of CHI 99. ACM, New York, 418--425. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Tilson, R., Dong, J., Martin, S., and Kieke, E. 1998. A comparison of two current e-commerce sites. In Proceedings of the ACM 16th International Conference on Systems Documentation. ACM, New York, 87--92. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Todd, S. and Kramer, A. 1993. Attentional guidance in visual attention. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, 1378--1382.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Vinson, N. G. 1999. Design guidelines for landmarks to support navigation in virtual environments. In Human Factors in Computing Systems: Proceedings of CHI '99. ACM, New York, 278--285. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang, P. and Soergel, D. 1998. A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study I. Document selection. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 49(2), 115--133. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Effects of scent and breadth on use of site-specific search on e-commerce Web sites

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader