skip to main content
10.1145/952532.952551acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A Markov Random Field model of microarray gridding

Published:09 March 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

DNA microarray hybridisation is a popular high through-put technique in academic as well as industrial functional genomics research. In this paper we present a new approach to automatic grid segmentation of the raw fluorescence microarray images by Markov Random Field (MRF) techniques. The main objectives are applicability to various types of array designs and robustness to the typical problems encountered in microarray images, which are contaminations and weak signal.We briefly introduce microarray technology and give some background on MRFs. Our MRF model of microarray gridding is designed to integrate different application specific constraints and heuristic criteria into a robust and flexible segmentation algorithm. We show how to compute the model components efficiently and state our deterministic MRF energy minimization algorithm that was derived from the 'Highest Confidence First' algorithm by Chou et al. Since MRF segmentation may fail due to the properties of the data and the minimization algorithm, we use supplied or estimated print layouts to validate results.Finally we present results of tests on several series of microarray images from different sources, some of them test sets published with other microarray gridding software. Our MRF grid segmentation requires weaker assumptions about the array printing process than previously published methods and produces excellent results on many real datasets.An implementation of the described methods is available upon request from the authors.

References

  1. D. H. Ballard. Computer Vision. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 10. edition, 1982. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Blake and A. Zisserman. Visual Reconstruction. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. Bozinov and J. Rahnenführer. Unsupervised technique for robust target separation and analysis of DNA microarray spots through adaptive pixel clustering. Bioinformatics, 18(5), 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. S. Brown., P. Goodwin, and P. Sorger. Image metrics in the statistical analysis of DNA microarray data. PNAS, 98(16):8944--8949, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. Buhler, T. Ideker, and D. Haynor. Dapple: Improved Techiques for Finding Spots on DNA Microarrays. Technical Report UWTR 2000-08-05, University of Washington, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Y. Chen, E. R. Dougherty, and M. L. Bittner. Ratio-Based Decisions and the Quantitative Analysis of cDNA Microarray Images. J. Biomedical Optics, 2(4):364--374, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. B. Chou, P. R. Cooper, M. J. Swain, C. M. Brown, and L. E. Wixson. Probabilistic Network Inference for Cooperative High and Low Level Vision. In R. Chellappa, editor, Markov random fields, pages 211--243. 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Eisen and P. Brown. DNA arrays for analysis of gene expression. Methods in Enzymology, 303, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gai, X., Lal, S., Xing, L., Brendel, V., and V. Walbot. Gene discovery using the maize genome database ZmDB. Nucleic Acids Research, (28):94--96, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Jain, T. Tokuyasu, A. Snijders, R. Segraves, D. Albertson, and D. Pinkel. Fully Automatic Quantification of Microarray Image Data. Genome Res., 12(2):325--332, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. M. Katzer, F. Kummert, and G. Sagerer. Automatische Auswertung von Mikroarraybildern. In Workshop Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin, Leipzig, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. R. Kindermann and J. L. Snell. Markov random fields and their applications. Contemporary Mathematics 1. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. S. Z. Li. Markov random field modeling in image analysis. Computer science workbench. Springer, Tokyo, 2. edition, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. G. Sherlock, T. Hernandez-Boussard, and A. Kasarskis. The Stanford Microarray Database. Nucleic Acids Research, (29):152--155, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Steinfath, W. Wruck, and H. Seidel. Automated image analysis for array hybridization experiments. Bioinformatics, 2001, Vol. 17, T. 7, S. 634--641, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Y. H. Yang, M. J. Buckley, S. Dudoit, and T. P. Speed. Comparison of Methods for Image Analysis on cDNA Microarray Data. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 11:108--136, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SAC '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Applied computing
    March 2003
    1268 pages
    ISBN:1581136242
    DOI:10.1145/952532

    Copyright © 2003 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 9 March 2003

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader