skip to main content
10.1145/958160.958182acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Technology-use mediation: making sense of electronic communication in an organizational context

Published:09 November 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study analyzes how a group of 'mediators' in a large, multinational company adapted a computer-mediated communication technology (a 'virtual workspace') to the local organizational context (and vice versa) by modifying features of the technology, providing ongoing support for users, and promoting appropriate conventions of use. Our findings corroborate earlier research on technology-use mediation, which suggests that such mediators can exert considerable influence on how a particular technology will be established and used in an organization. However, this study also indicates that the process of technology-use mediation is more complex and indeterminate than earlier literature suggests. In particular, we want to draw attention to the fact that advanced computer-mediated communication technologies are equivocal and that technology-use mediation consequently requires ongoing sensemaking.

References

  1. Barley, S. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CAT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31: 78--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bowers, J. (1994). The work to make a network work: studying CSCW in action, in CSCW '94 Proceedings: 287--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ciborra, C. U. (1996). What does groupware mean for the organizations hosting it?, in C.U. Ciborra (ed.), Groupware & Teamwork, Wiley: 1--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. DeSanctis, G. & Poole, M. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science 5 (2): 121--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fielding, R. T., Whitehead Jr., E., Anderson, K. M., Bolcer, G. A., Oreizy, P. & Taylor, R. N. (1998). Web-based development of complex information products. Communications of the ACM 41 (8): 84--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gantt, M. & Nardi, B. A. (1992). Gardeners and gurus: patterns of cooperation among CAD users, in Proceedings of CHI'92, ACM: 107--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Grudin, J. (1988). Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces, in CSCW '88 Proceedings: 85--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Henriksen, D. L., Nicolajsen, H. W. & Pors, J. K. (2002). Towards variation or uniformity? Comparing technology-use mediations of web-based groupware, in Proceedings of ECIS 2002, June 6-8, Gdansk, Poland: 1174--1184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology 35 (2): 441--456.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Klein, H. K. & Myers, M. D (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly 23 (1): 67--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kraut, R. E., Rice, R. E., Cool, C. & Fish, R.S. (1998). Varieties of social influence: the role of utility and norms in the success of a new communication medium. Organization Science 9 (4): 437--453. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lanzara, G. F. (1999). Between transient constructs and persistent structures: designing systems in action. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 8: 331--349.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Leonard-Barton, D. (1988). Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy 17: 251--267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Mackay, W. (1990). Patterns of sharing customizable software, in CSCW '90 Proceedings: 209--221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Majchrzak, A., Rice, R. E., Malhotra, A., King, N. & Ba, S. (2000). Technology adaptation: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quarterly 24 (4): 569--600. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mark, G. (2002). Conventions and commitments in distributed CSCW groups. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 11: 349--387. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Myers, M. D. (1997). Qualitative research in information systems. MISQ Discovery. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Nardi, B. and Miller, J (1991). Twinkling lights and nested loops: distributed problem solving and spreadsheet development. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34: 161--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Ngwenyama, O. K. (1998). Groupware, social action and organizational emergence: on the process dynamics of computer mediated distributed work. Accounting, Management and Information Technology 8: 127--146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 3 (3): 398--427.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science 11 (4): 404--428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Orlikowski, W. J., J. Yates, K. Okamura, and M. Fujimoto (1995). Shaping electronic communication: the metastructuring of technology in the context of use, Organization Science 6 (4): 423--444.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Porac, J. F., Thomas, H. and Baden-Fuller, C. (1989). Competitive groups as cognitive communities: the case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. Journal of Management Studies 26: 397--416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Ring, P. S. and Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Formal and informal dimensions of transactions, in A.H. Van de Ven, H.L. Angle and M.S. Poole (eds.), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies, New York, NY: Ballinger.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Trigg, R. and S. Bødker (1994). From implementation to design: tailoring and the emergence of systematization in CSCW, in CSCW '94 Proceedings: 45--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Weick, K. (1990). Technology as equivoque: sensemaking in new technologies, in P.S. Goodman & L. Sproull (eds.), Technology and Organization, San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Weick, K. (1993). Organizational redesign as improvisation, in G.P. Huber, and W.H. Glick (eds.), Organizational Change and Redesign. Oxford University Press: 346--379.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Winograd, T. & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Technology-use mediation: making sense of electronic communication in an organizational context

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            GROUP '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
            November 2003
            390 pages
            ISBN:1581136935
            DOI:10.1145/958160

            Copyright © 2003 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 9 November 2003

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate125of405submissions,31%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader