skip to main content
article

Crossing the divide

Published:01 March 2004Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This essay summarizes the editor's views of publication in the field of human-computer interaction. Digital technologies have begun changing the way journal articles and conference papers are produced, reviewed, published, accessed, and used. This period of profound change presents challenges and opportunities for both new and existing channels of scientific and technical communication.

References

  1. AAAI 2004. Call for papers. http://www.aaai.org/Conferences/National/2004/Technical/aaai04-call.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. AFCS 2002. Alliance for cellular signaling: Into unknown territory. Nature 420, 600--601.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler, D. 2001. Los Alamos loses physics archive as preprint pioneer heads east. Nature 412, 3--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Fox, P. T., Parsons, L. M., and Lancaster, J. L. 1998. Beyond the single study: function/location analysis in cognitive neuroimaging. Current opinion in neurobiology, 8, 178--187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kronick, D. A. 1976. A history of scientific and technical periodicals, second edition. Methuen N.J.: Scarecrow Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kuhn, T. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kurtz, M. 2002. The scholars rebellion against scholarly publishing practices: Varmus, Vitek, and venting. Searcher 10, 1, 28--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. McGrath, J. 1991. Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group research 22, 2, 147--174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Melville, H. 1851. Moby Dick. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Merton, R. K. 1988. The Matthew effect in science II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis 79, 4, 606--623.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mylonopoulos, N. A. and Theoharakis, V. 2001. Global perceptions of IS journals. Comm. ACM 44, 9, 29--32. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sulloway, F. J. 1996. Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Pantheon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Te'eni, D. 2001. A cognitive-affective model of organizational communication for designing IT. MIS Quarterly 25, 2, 251--312. http://misq.org/misreview/teeni.shtml Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Waddington, C. H. 1977. Tools for thought. London: Paladin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ziman, J. M. 1966. Public knowledge: the social dimension of science. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Zuckerman, H. and Merton, R. K. 1971. Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalism, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva 9, 1, 66--100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Crossing the divide

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader