skip to main content
10.1145/982372.982388acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A qualitative study of the occupational subculture of information systems employees in organizations

Published:22 April 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

Information Technology (IT) facilitates the effective functioning of most organizations. Individuals who support IT are an important facet to an organization. In the present study, we interviewed these individuals as well as other employees to identify their responsibilities, intra-group and inter-group communication. We used Trice's occupational subculture framework to look at the intrinsic differences among subcultures and its members. The results of our study suggest that conflicts arise from differences within members of subcultures. Observed situations of adaptation between occupational subcultures represent an example for remedy to rectify this conflict crisis.

References

  1. Agarwal, R. and Ferratt, T.W. Retention and the career motives of IT professionals. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research, (April 2000), 158--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alvarez, R. Confessions of an information worker: A critical analysis of information requirement discourse. Information and Organization, 12, (2002), 85--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bahn, D. System Designer-User Interaction: An Occupational Subcultures Perspective. Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research, (1995), 72--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Barki, H. and Hartwick, J. Interpersonal Conflict and Its Management in Information System Development, MIS Quarterly, 25(2), (2001), 195--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Charmaz, K. Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods. In Denzin and Lincoln, 2000Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Crowston K, and Kammerer E. Coordination and collective mind in software requirement development. IBM System Journal, 37 (2), (1998), 227--245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. Handbook of Qualitative Research. University of Illinois: Urbana-Champaign, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Douglas, M. Cultural Bias. London: Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Douglas, M. Introduction to grid/group analysis. In Essays in the Sociology of Perception, ed. Mary Douglas, London: Routledge, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Enns, H.G., Huff, S.L. and Golden B.R. How CIOs obtain peer commitment to strategic IS proposals: barriers and facilitators. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 10(1), (2001), 3--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Franz, C.R. and Robey, D. Organizational Context, User Involvement, and the Usefulness of Information Systems. Decision Sciences, 17(4), (1986), 329--356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Gubrium, J. Handbook of interview research: context and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hornik S, Chen HG, Klein G and Jiang J.J. Communication Skills of IS Providers: An Expectation Gap Analysis from 3 Stakeholders Perspectives. IEEE Transactions of Professional Communication. 46(1), (2003), 17--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Igbaria, M., Greenhaus J.H. and Parasuraman S. Career Orientations of MIS Employees: An Empirical Analysis. MIS Quarterly, 15(2), (1991), 151--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jacobs P. Strong writing skills essential for success, even in IT. Inforworld, 20(27), (1998), 86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Janesick, V.J. Stretching Exercises for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kvale, S. Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Marion L., and Marion D. Information Technology Professionals as Collaborative Change Agents: A Case Study from Behavioral Health Care. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 24(6), (August/September 1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Myers, M.E. Motivation and Performance in the Information Systems Field: A survey of related studies. ACM SIGCPR Computer Personnel, 13(3), (November 1991). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Norman D. The practices and politics of interpretation. In The handbook of qualitative research, edited by Denzin and Lincoln. 2nd edition. Sage, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Orlikowski, W.J., and Baroudi, J.J. The Information Systems Profession: Myth or Reality?. Office, Technology, and People, 4(1), (1989), 13--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Prior, M., Rogerson, S., and Fairweather, B. The Ethical Attitudes of Information Systems Professionals: Outcomes of an initial survey. Telematics and Informatics, 19, (2002), 21--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Stanton, J.M. and Stam K. Information Technology, Privacy, and Power within Organizations: a view from Boundary Theory and Social Exchange Perspectives. Surveillance and Society 1(2), (2003), 152--190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Stanton, J.M. and Weiss, E.M. Electronic Monitoring in Their Own Words: An Exploratory Study of Employees' Experiences with New Types of Surveillance. Computers in Human Behavior 16, (2000), 423--440.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Trice, H.M. and Beyer, J.M. The Cultures of Work Organizations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Trice, H. M. Occupational subcultures in the workplace. ILR Press, Ithaca. 1993, xvi, 286p., wraps. (Cornell studies in industrial and labor relations, no. 26), 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Wynekoop, J.L. and Walz D.B. Revisiting the perennial question: are IS people different?, The Database for Advances in Information Systems, 29 (2), April 1998, 62--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A qualitative study of the occupational subculture of information systems employees in organizations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGMIS CPR '04: Proceedings of the 2004 SIGMIS conference on Computer personnel research: Careers, culture, and ethics in a networked environment
      April 2004
      160 pages
      ISBN:1581138474
      DOI:10.1145/982372

      Copyright © 2004 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 April 2004

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader