skip to main content
10.1145/985692.985715acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A diary study of task switching and interruptions

Published:25 April 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

We report on a diary study of the activities of information workers aimed at characterizing how people interleave multiple tasks amidst interruptions. The week-long study revealed the type and complexity of activities performed, the nature of the interruptions experienced, and the difficulty of shifting among numerous tasks. We present key findings from the diary study and discuss implications of the findings. Finally, we describe promising directions in the design of software tools for task management, motivated by the findings.

References

  1. Bannon, L., Cypher, A., Greenspan, S., and Monty, M. (1983). Evaluation and analysis of user's activity organization". In Proc. CHI'83 (pp. 54--57). NY: ACM.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Card, S.K. & Henderson, A.H. Jr. (1987). A multiple, virtual-workspace interface to support user task switching. In: Proceedings of the CHI+GI, Toronto, Canada. ACM Press, 53--59.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chambers, C.V., Balaban, D.J., Carlson, B.L., Ungemack, J.A. MPH &Grasberger, D.M. (1989). Microcomputer-generated reminders: Improving the compliance of primary care physicians with mammography screening guidelines. Journal of Family Practice, 29(3), 273--280.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Czerwinski, M., Cutrell, E., & Horvitz, E. (2000). Instant Messaging and Interruption: Influence of Task Type on Performance. Proceedings of OZCHI 2000, 356--361.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Czerwinski, M. & Horvitz, E. (2002). Memory for Daily Computing Events. <<http://research.microsoft.com/~marycz/hci2002final.pdf> In Faulkner, X., Finlay, J. & Detienne, F. (Eds.), People and Computers XVI, Proceedings of HCI 2002, 230--245.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Derthick, M. & Roth, S.F. (2000). Data exploration across temporal contexts, Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI 2000), New Orleans, LA, 60--67.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. DeVaul, R.W., Clarkson, B. & Pentland, A.S. (2000). The memory glasses: Towards a wearable, context-aware, situation-appropriate reminder system. <<http://web.media.mit.edu/~rich/memory/SIUC00/>Main.html.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dey, A.K. & Abowd, G.D. (2000). CyberMinder: A context-aware system for supporting reminders. In Proceedings of HUC 2000, 172--186.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dey, A.K., Abowd, G.D., Wood, A. CyberDesk: A Framework for Providing Self-Integrating Context-Aware Services Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '98) <http://sigart.acm.org/Conferences/iui/iui98/>, 47--54.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ellis, J. & Kvavilashvili, L. (2000). Prospective memory in 2000: Past, present and future directions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 1--9.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Fertig, S., Freeman, E. & Gelernter, D. (1996). Lifestreams: An alternative to the desktop metaphor. In Proceedings of ACM CHI '96 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Extended Abstracts, ACM Press, 410--411.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gillie, T. Broadbent, D. (1989). What Makes Interruptions Disruptive? A Study of Length, Similarity, and Complexity. Psychological Research, 50, 243--50.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Gwizdka, J. (2000). Timely Reminders: A Case Study of Temporal Guidance in PIM and Email Tools Usage. Extended abstract in Proceedings of CHI 2000, Human Factors in Computing Systems, Volume 2, ACM Press,163--164.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Henderson, D. A. Jr., Card, S.K. (1986). Rooms: The Use of Multiple Virtual Workspaces to Reduce Space Contention in a Window-based Graphical User Interface, ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 5, No. 3, 211--243.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hess, S.M. & Detweiler, M.C. (1994). Training to reduce the disruptive effects of interruptions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society's 38th Annual Meeting, 1173--1177.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Hess, S., Detweiler, M.C., & Ellis, R. D. (1999). The utility of display space in keeping-track of rapidly changing information. Human Factors, 41(2), 257--281.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Holden, K. L. & O'Neal, M.R. (1992). The utility of various windowing capabilities for single-task and multi-task environments. In Proceedings of CHI'92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Extended Abstracts, ACM Press, 52--53.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jones, W.P., Bruce, H. & Dumais, S. T. (2001). Keeping found things found on the web. In Proceedings of ACM's CIKM'01, Tenth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 119--126.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kandogan, E. and Shneiderman, B. (1997). Elastic Windows: evaluation of multi-window operations. In Proceedings of CHI '97 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM press, 250--257.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kaptelinin, V. (2002) UMEA: User-Monitoring Environment for Activities. UIST '02 Companion. Posters and Demos from the 15th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 31--32.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lamming, M.G. & Newman, W.M. (1992). Activity-based information retrieval: Technology in support of personal memory. Information Processing 92, 3, 68--81.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lamming, M., Brown, P., Carter, K., Eldridge, M., Flynn, M., Louie, G., Robinson, P., & Sellen, AJ. (1994). The design of a human memory prosthesis. Computer Journal, 37(3), 153--163.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. MacIntyre, B., Mynatt, E., Voida, S., Hansen, K., Tullio, J., Corso, G. (2001). Support for multitasking and background awareness using interactive peripheral displays. In Proceedings of Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST 2001, 41--50.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Maglio, P.P., Campbell, C.S. (2000). Tradeoffs in Displaying Peripheral Information. In Proceedings of CHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, 241--248.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Malone, T. W. (1983). How do people organize their desks? Implications for the design of office automation systems, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems I, 99--112.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. McFarlane, D.C. & Latorella, K.A. (2002). The Scope and Importance of Human Interruption in HCI design, Human Computer Interaction, 17, 1--62.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Myers, B. (1988). Window interfaces: A taxonomy of window manager user interfaces, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 8, 5, 65--84.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. O'Connail, B. & Frohlich, D. (1995). Timespace in the workplace: Dealing with interruptions. CHI '95 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Extended Abstracts, ACM Press, 262--263.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Rekimoto, J. (1999). Time-Machine Computing: A Time-centric Approach for the Information Environment. In Proceedings of Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST '99, 45--54.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Renaud, K. (2000). Expediting rapid recovery from interruptions by providing a visualization of application activity. Proceedings of OZCHI 2000, 348--355.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Rhodes B, Starner T. (1996). Remembrance agent: A continuously running automated information retrieval system. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi Agent Technology (PAAM '96). London, UK, 487--495.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Robertson, G., van Dantzich, M., Robbins, D., Czerwinski, M., Hinckley, K., Risden, K., Thiel, D., Gorokhovsky, V. (2000). The Task Gallery: a 3D window manager. In Proceedings of CHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, 494--501.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Sellen, A.J., Louie, G, Harris, J.E. & Wilkins, A.J. (1996). What brings intentions to mind? An in situ study of prospective memory. Memory, 5(4), 483--507.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Smith, G., Baudisch, P., Robertson, G. G., Czerwinski, M., Meyers, B., Robbins, D., & Andrews, D. (2003). GroupBar: The TaskBar evolved. Proceedings of OZCHI 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Terry, W.S. (1988). Everyday forgetting: Data from a diary study. Psychological Reports, 62, 299--303.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A diary study of task switching and interruptions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2004
      742 pages
      ISBN:1581137028
      DOI:10.1145/985692

      Copyright © 2004 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 April 2004

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader