Mick McGee
ABSTRACT
Master Usability Scaling (MUS) is a measurement method for developing a universal usability continuum based on magnitude estimation and master scaling. The universal usability continuum allows true ratio comparisons, potentially between all items measurable by the construct of usability (attributes, tasks, or products -- software or hardware) that have contributed to the meta-set by following the procedures prescribed. This paper describes the background for MUS, data reduction, and cases studies in software usability assessment.MUS is based on a new measurement method of usability, Usability Magnitude Estimation (UME) [9], where users estimate usability magnitude according to an objective definition of usability. UME allows all items measured within a single usability activity to be compared across one continuum. MUS utilizes UME to assess standard reference tasks across different usability activities to construct one meta-set of data. This meta-set of data can be represented as a universal usability continuum. MUS is simple to administer, easy to comprehend, and with advanced underlying calculations, powerful to use. The MUS continuum has the potential to be a widespread, robust, universal measurement scale of usability.
- Badia, P. and Runyon, R.P. (1982). Fundamentals of behavioral research. Random House.Google Scholar
- Berglund, M.B. (1991). Quality assurance in environmental psychophysics. In S.J. Bolanowski, & G.A. Gescheider, (Eds.), Ratio scaling of psychological magnitude: In honor of the memory of S.S. Stevens. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
- Brooke, J. (1996). A "quick and dirty" usability scale. In Jordan, P., Thomas, B., and Weerdmeester, B. (Eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry. UK: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Frokjaer, E., Hertzum, M., and Hornbaek, K. (2000). Measuring usability: Are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated? Proc. CHI 2000, 345--352. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gescheider, G.A. (1997). Psychophysics: The Fundamentals, 3rd Ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
- Ivory, M. and Hearst, M. (2001). The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces. ACM Computing Surveys, 33(4), 470--516. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kirakowski, J. (1996). The software usability measurement inventory: Background and usage. In Jordan, P., Thomas, B., and Weerdmeester, B. (Eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry. UK: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Lund, A. (1998). The need for a standardized set of usability metrics. Proc. HFES, 42nd Annual Meeting, 688--691.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McGee, M. (2003). Usability magnitude estimation. Proc. HFES, 47th Annual Meeting, (691--695).Google ScholarCross Ref
- McGee, M. (1998). Assessing negative side effects in virtual environments. Masters Thesis. Virginia Tech.Google Scholar
- Medlock, M.C., Wixon, D., Terrano, M., Romero, R.L., and Fulton, B. (2002). Using the RITE method to improve products: A definition and a case study. Proc. Usability Professionals Association.Google Scholar
- Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Academic Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- NIST. (2001). Common industry format for usability reports. National Institute of Standards and Technology.Google Scholar
- Snow, M.P. and Williges, R.C. (1998). Empirical models based on free-modulus magnitude estimation of perceived presence in virtual environments. Human Factors, 40(3), 386--402.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stevens, S.S. (1971). Issues in psychophysical measurement. Psychological Review, 78(5), 426--45.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Master usability scaling: magnitude estimation and master scaling applied to usability measurement
Recommendations
The Usability Metric for User Experience
The Usability Metric for User Experience (UMUX) is a four-item Likert scale used for the subjective assessment of an application's perceived usability. It is designed to provide results similar to those obtained with the 10-item System Usability Scale, ...
Evaluating Usability of IFML Models: How Usability is Perceived and Propagated
IHC '18: Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing SystemsSystem acceptance is strongly related to its usability. It is important that the usability is carefully designed during the system design steps and later propagated to the interface. This care avoids reworking the interface design of an application in ...
Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research
How to measure usability is an important question in HCI research and user interface evaluation. We review current practice in measuring usability by categorizing and discussing usability measures from 180 studies published in core HCI journals and ...
Comments