F. P. McMartin
ABSTRACT
Faculty users of education digital libraries require contents that are high quality and that are effective teaching and learning materials. Faculty use peer reviews of these materials to select those that they wish to use. MERLOT has developed a scalable, effective peer review system that meets the needs of its users. This paper describes evaluation research conducted to ensure that as the process is reliable, trusted and useable.
Index Terms
- Ensuring quality in peer review
Recommendations
Peer Review in Education: Promoting Collaboration, Written Expression, Critical Thinking, and Professional Responsibility
This article discusses the application of the peer review process as a pedagogical instrument for the promotion of written expression, collaborative work, critical thinking, and professional responsibility among Informatics and Engineering majors. The ...
Peer Review in CS2: Conceptual Learning and High-Level Thinking
In computer science, students could benefit from exposure to critical programming concepts from multiple perspectives. Peer review is one method to allow students to experience authentic uses of the concepts in an activity that is not itself ...
Peer review in CS2: conceptual learning
SIGCSE '10: Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science educationIn computer science, students could benefit from exposure to critical programming concepts from multiple perspectives. Peer review is one method to allow students to experience authentic uses of the concepts in a non-programming manner. In this work, we ...
Comments