Abstract
The nervous system is one of the most complex known dynamical systems; thus, its disorders are among the most severe. Scientists and clinicians look for the best possible methods allowing for comprehensive understanding and for reliable assessment and treatment of human nervous system disorders. Noise may be perceived as a useful control signal for particular nervous system functions, including further development of neurorehabilitation and clinical applications of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), neuroprostheses (NPs), deep brain stimulation (DBS), etc. The awareness of associated chances and limitations allow for the wise planning and management of further clinical practice, especially in the area of long-term neurorehabilitation and care. This article aims at investigating the extent to which the available knowledge and experience may be identified and utilized, including potential future applications.
References
1. Duch W, Nowak W, Meller J, Osiński G, Dobosz K. Computational approach to understanding autism spectrum disorders. Comput Sci J 2012;14:47–61.10.7494/csci.2012.13.2.47Search in Google Scholar
2. Duch W, Nowak W, Meller J, Osiński G, Dobosz K, Mikołajewski D, et al. Consciousness and attention in autism spectrum disorders. Cracow: Proceedings of Cracow Grid Workshop 2011;2010:202–11.Search in Google Scholar
3. Dominici N, Keller U, Vallery H, Friedli L, van den Brand R, Starkey ML, et al. Versatile robotic interface to evaluate, enable and train locomotion and balance after neuromotor disorders. Nat Med 2012;18:1142–7.10.1038/nm.2845Search in Google Scholar
4. van den Brand R, Heutschi J, Barraud Q, DiGiovanna J, Bartholdi K, Huerlimann M, et al. Restoring voluntary control of locomotion after paralyzing spinal cord injury. Science 2012;336:1182–5.10.1126/science.1217416Search in Google Scholar
5. Harat M, Radziszewski K, Rudaś M, Okoń M, Galanda M. Clinical evaluation of deep cerebellar stimulation for spasticity in patients with cerebral palsy. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2009;43: 36–44.Search in Google Scholar
6. Sokal P, Harat M, Paczkowski D, Rudaś M, Birski M, Litwinowicz A. Results of neuromodulation for the management of chronic pain. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2011;45:445–51.10.1016/S0028-3843(14)60312-1Search in Google Scholar
7. Faisal AA, Selen LP, Wolpert DM. Noise in the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008;9;292–303.10.1038/nrn2258Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
8. Faisal AA. Noise in neurons and other constraints. In: Le Novère N, editor. Computational systems neurobiology. New York: Springer, 2012:227–57.Search in Google Scholar
9. Qureshi IA, Mehler MF. Towards a ‘systems’-level understanding of the nervous system and its disorders. Trends Neurosci 2013. pii: S0166-2236(13)00132-X. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2013.07.003.10.1016/j.tins.2013.07.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
10. McIntosh AR, Kovacevic N, Lippe S, Garrett D, Grady C, Jirsa V. The development of a noisy brain. Arch Ital Biol 2010;148: 323–37.Search in Google Scholar
11. Hagmann P, Cammoun L, Gigandet X, Meuli R, Honey CJ, Wedeen VJ, et al. Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol 2008;6:e159.10.1371/journal.pbio.0060159Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
12. Honey CJ, Sporns O. Dynamical consequences of lesions in cortical networks. Hum Brain Mapp 2008;29:802–9.10.1002/hbm.20579Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
13. Woods HA, Wilson JK. An information hypothesis for the evolution of homeostasis. Trends Ecol Evol 2013;28:283–9.10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Spiridon M, Gerstner W. Noise spectrum and signal transmission through a population of spiking neurons. Network 1999;10:257–72.10.1088/0954-898X_10_3_304Search in Google Scholar
15. Patriarca M, Postnova S, Braun HA, Hernández-García E, Toral R. Diversity and noise effects in a model of homeostatic regulation of the sleep-wake cycle. PLoS Comput Biol 2012;8:e1002650.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002650Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
16. Xue G, Dong Q, Chen C, Lu Z, Mumford JA, Poldrack RA. Greater neural pattern similarity across repetitions is associated with better memory. Science 2010;330:97–101.10.1126/science.1193125Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
17. Balduzzi D, Tononi G. Integrated information in discrete dynamical systems: motivation and theoretical framework. PLoS Comput Biol 2008;4:e1000091.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000091Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
18. Tononi G, Sporns O, Edelman GM. A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:5033–7.10.1073/pnas.91.11.5033Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
19. Seth AK, Izhikevich E, Reeke GN, Edelman GM. Theories and measures of consciousness: an extended framework. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2006;103:10799–804.10.1073/pnas.0604347103Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
20. Garrett DD, Kovacevic N, McIntosh AR, Grady CH. The importance of being variable. J Neurosci 2011;31:4496–503.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5641-10.2011Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
21. Mikołajewska E, Mikołajewski D. Clinical significance of computational brain models in neurorehabilitation. Med Biol Sci 2013;27:19–26.Search in Google Scholar
22. Dobosz K, Duch W. Understanding neurodynamical systems via fuzzy symbolic dynamics. Neural Networks 2010;23:487–96.10.1016/j.neunet.2009.12.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Duch W, Dobosz K. Visualization for understanding of neurodynamical systems. Cognit Neurodyn 2011;5:145–60.10.1007/s11571-011-9153-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
24. Mikołajewska E, Mikołajewski D. Role of brainstem within human body systems – computational approach. J Health Sci 2012;2:95–106.Search in Google Scholar
25. Mikołajewska E, Mikołajewski D. Consciousness disorders as the possible effect of brainstem activity failure – computational approach. J Health Sci 2012;2:7–18.Search in Google Scholar
26. Mikołajewska E, Mikołajewski D. Computational approach to neural plasticity of nervous system on system level. J Health Sci 2012;2:39–47.Search in Google Scholar
27. Griffin R, Westbury CH. Infant EEG activity as a biomarker for autism: a promising approach or a false promise? BMC Med 2011;9:61.10.1186/1741-7015-9-61Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
28. Bosl W, Tierney A, Tager-Flusberg H, Nelson CH. EEG complexity as a biomarker for autism spectrum disorder risk. BMC Med 2011;9:18.10.1186/1741-7015-9-18Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
29. Catarino A, Churches O, Baron-Cohen S, Andrade A, Ring H. Atypical EEG complexity in autism spectrum conditions: a multiscale entropy analysis. Clin Neurophysiol 2011;122:2375–83.10.1016/j.clinph.2011.05.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed
30. Gamez D, Aleksander I. Accuracy and performance of the state-based Φ and liveliness measures of information integration. Conscious Cogn 2011;20:1403–24.10.1016/j.concog.2011.05.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed
©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston
