Abstract
The paper presents a description of a humeral joint dislocation case placed in full version in the electronic system of presenting content and making decisions. The purpose of the publication is to draw the attention of especially young, inexperienced adepts of medical art to the fact of making mistakes in the medical art. The process of dealing with the correct and incorrect procedures that occur while trying to identify a medical problem is discussed. The presented case gives the opportunity to have a broad view of the issue and is also faced with the need to make decisions by choosing the course of action, at every stage of analyzing the case. Mistakenly made decisions are explained. Finally, the correct diagnosis and medical procedure about the case of a humeral joint dislocation is presented.
Ethical Approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animal use.
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
Conflict of interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
[1] Atesok K, Mabrey JD, Jazrawi LM, Egol KA. Surgical simulation in orthopaedic skills training. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012;20:410–22.Search in Google Scholar
[2] Noszczyk B. Chirurgia Bliska Przyszłości. Pol Przegl Chir 2004;32:409–14.Search in Google Scholar
[3] Grunwald T, Krummel T, Sherman R. Advanced technologies in plastic surgery: how new innovations can improve our training and practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1556–67.10.1097/01.PRS.0000138242.60324.1DSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[4] Noszczyk B. Chirurgia bliższej przyszłości. Pol Przegl Chir 1995;30:444–9.Search in Google Scholar
[5] Wolff J, Parker C, Borisoff J, Mortenson WB, Mattie J. A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2014;11:169.10.1186/1743-0003-11-169Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[6] Jarrassé N, Proietti T, Crocher V, Robertson J, Sahbani A, Morel G, et al. Robotic exoskeletons: a perspective for the rehabilitation of arm coordination in stroke patients. Front Hum Neurosci 2014;8:947.10.3389/fnhum.2014.00947Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[7] Zadpoor AA. Open forward and inverse problems in theoretical modeling of bone tissue adaptation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2013;27:249–61.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.05.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[8] Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Triola MM. Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 2010;85:1589–602.10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181edfe13Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] Küfner J, Kononowicz AA, Hege I. Virtual patient repositories – a comparative analysis. Stud Health Technol Inform 2014;205:788–92.Search in Google Scholar
[10] Stangel-Wójcikiewicz K, Piwowar M, Migdał M, Skotniczny K. Virtual patient case: study of a urinary incontinence therapy procedure in a woman. Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 2014;10:151–7.10.1515/bams-2014-0007Search in Google Scholar
[11] Jacek D, Płonka S, Roterman-Konieczna I. Involvement of medical experts in legal proceedings: an e-learning approach. Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst. 2014;10:159–65.10.1515/bams-2014-0009Search in Google Scholar
[12] Dygut J, Piwowar P, Gołda M, Popławski K, Jakubas R. Simulations in orthopedics and rehabilitation – Part II : computer simulations. Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst 2016;12:159–68.10.1515/bams-2016-0022Search in Google Scholar
[13] Dygut J, Piwowar P, Gołda M, Popławski K, Jakubas R. Simulations in orthopedics and rehabilitation – Part I : simulators. Bio-Algorithms Med-Syst 2016;12:147–57.10.1515/bams-2016-0021Search in Google Scholar
[14] medtube, (n.d.). http://medtube.pl/.Search in Google Scholar
[15] arthro-mentor, (n.d.). http://simbionix.com/simulators/arthro-mentor/.Search in Google Scholar
[16] Symulator GERonTologiczny GERT. (n.d.) http://www.symulator-starosci.com/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIoZauuLq35AIVDqmaCh15cQebEAAYASAAEgIudPD_BwE.Search in Google Scholar
[17] CASUS: e-learning system for medical case presentation; (n.d.). https://krakow.casus.net.Search in Google Scholar
[18] Kononowicz AA, Zary N, Edelbring S, Corral J, Hege I. Virtual patients – what are we talking about? A framework to classify the meanings of the term in healthcare education. BMC Med Educ 2015;15:11.10.1186/s12909-015-0296-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[19] Hege I, Kononowicz AA, Tolks D, Edelbring S, Kuehlmeyer K. A qualitative analysis of virtual patient descriptions in healthcare education based on a systematic literature review. BMC Med Educ 2016;16:146.10.1186/s12909-016-0655-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[20] Berlin L. Medical errors, malpractice, and defensive medicine: an ill-fated triad. Diagnosis 2017;4:133–9.10.1515/dx-2017-0007Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[21] Arslan MN, Kertmen Ç, Melez DO, Evcüman D, Büyük Y. Use of trauma scoring systems on determining the physicians’ responsibility in cases of traumatic death with medical malpractice claim. Turkish J Trauma Emerg Surg 2017;23:328–36.10.5505/tjtes.2016.50540Search in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
