Abstract
Despite great progress in understanding the functions and structures of the central nervous system (CNS) the brain stem remains one of the least understood systems. We know that the brain stem acts as a decision station preparing the organism to act in a specific way, but such functions are rather difficult to model with sufficient precision to replicate experimental data due to the scarcity of data and complexity of large-scale simulations of brain stem structures. The approach proposed in this article retains some ideas of previous models, and provides more precise computational realization that enables qualitative interpretation of the functions played by different network states. Simulations are aimed primarily at the investigation of general switching mechanisms which may be executed in brain stem neural networks, as far as studying how the aforementioned mechanisms depend on basic neural network features: basic ionic channels, accommodation, and the influence of noise.
Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animal use.
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
[1] Prats-Galino A, Soria G, de Notaris M, Puig J, Pedraza S. Functional anatomy of subcortical circuits issuing from or integrating at the human brain stem. Clin Neurophysiol 2012;123:4–12.10.1016/j.clinph.2011.06.035Search in Google Scholar
[2] Laigle-Donadey F, Doz F, Delattre JY. Brain stem tumors. Handb Clin Neurol 2012;105:585–605.10.1016/B978-0-444-53502-3.00010-0Search in Google Scholar
[3] Hurley RA, Flashman LA, Chow TW, Taber KH. The brain stem: anatomy, assessment, and clinical syndromes. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2010;22:1–7.10.1176/jnp.2010.22.1.ivSearch in Google Scholar
[4] Szalisznyó K, Zalányi L. Role of hyperpolarization-activated conductances in the auditory brain stem. Neurocomputing 2004;58–60:401–7.10.1016/j.neucom.2004.01.073Search in Google Scholar
[5] Butera RJ Jr., Johnson SM, DelNegro CA, Rinzel J, Smith JC. Dynamics of excitatory networks of bursting pacemaking neurons: modeling and experimental studies of the respiratory central pattern generator. Neurocomputing 2000;32–33:323–30.10.1016/S0925-2312(00)00181-8Search in Google Scholar
[6] Kosmidis EK, Vibert JF. A model of respiration rhythmogenesis bridging network and pacemaker theories. Neurocomputing 2001;38–40:733–9.10.1016/S0925-2312(01)00393-9Search in Google Scholar
[7] Rybak LA, Paton JF, Rogers RF, St.-John WM. Generation of the respiratory rhythm: state-dependency and switching. Neurocomputing 2002;44–46:605–14.10.1016/S0925-2312(02)00447-2Search in Google Scholar
[8] Li L, Xia Y, Jelfs B, Cao J, Mandic DP. Modelling of brain consciousness based on collaborative adaptive filters. Neurocomputing 2012;76:36–43.10.1016/j.neucom.2011.05.038Search in Google Scholar
[9] Filippov IV, Gladyshev AV, Williams WC. Role of infraslow (0–0.5 Hz) potential oscillations in the regulation of brain stress response by the locus coeruleus system. Neurocomputing 2002;44–46:795–8.10.1016/S0925-2312(02)00474-5Search in Google Scholar
[10] Damasio A. Self comes to mind. Constructing the conscious brain. New York: Pantehon Books, 2010.Search in Google Scholar
[11] Humphries MD, Gurney K. A means to an end: Validating models by fitting experimental data. Neurocomputing 2007;70:1892–6.10.1016/j.neucom.2006.10.061Search in Google Scholar
[12] O’Reilly RC, Munakata Y. Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience: understanding the mind by simulationg the brain. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.10.7551/mitpress/2014.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
[13] Kilmer W. A command computer for complex autonomous systems. Neurocomputing 1997;17:47–59.10.1016/S0925-2312(97)00044-1Search in Google Scholar
[14] Dunin-Barkowski WL, Lovering AT, Orem JM, Baekey DM, Dick TE, Rybak IA, et al. L-plotting – a method for visual analysis of physiological experimental and modeling multi-component data. Neurocomputing 2010;74:328–36.10.1016/j.neucom.2010.03.015Search in Google Scholar
[15] Babadi B. Stimulus transmission by tonic and burst responses in a minimal model of thalamic circuit. Neurocomputing 2004;58–60:7–12.10.1016/j.neucom.2004.01.015Search in Google Scholar
[16] Shin J. Towards computational and robotic modelling of animal cognition and behavior. Neurocomputing 2002;44–46:985–92.10.1016/S0925-2312(02)00501-5Search in Google Scholar
[17] Gray RT, Fung CK, Robinson PA. Stability of small-world networks of neural populations. Neurocomputing 1999;24:1–11.10.1016/j.neucom.2008.09.006Search in Google Scholar
[18] Humphries MD, Gurney KN, Prescott TJ. The brain stem reticular formation is a small world not scale free network. Proc Biol Sci 2006;273:503–11.Search in Google Scholar
[19] Olmsted DD. The recticular formation as a multi-valued logic neural network. Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 1990;1:619–24.10.1109/IJCNN.1990.137639Search in Google Scholar
[20] Zacks JM, Speer NK, Swallow KM, Braver TS, Reynolds JR. The brain’s cutting-room floor: segmentation of narrative cinema. Frontiers Hum Neurosci 2010;4:1–15.10.3389/fnhum.2010.00168Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[21] Cvetkovic D, Cosic I, editors. States of consciousness. Experimental insights into meditation, waking, sleep and dreams. New York: Springer, 2011.Search in Google Scholar
[22] Merker B. Consciousness without a cerebral cortex: a challenge for neuroscience and medicine. Behav Brain Sci 2004;30:63–134.10.1017/S0140525X07000891Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[23] Goertzel B, Lian R, Arel I, de Garis H, Chen S. A world survey of artificial brain projects, Part II: Biologically inspired cognitive architectures. Neurocomputing 2010;74:30–49.10.1016/j.neucom.2010.08.012Search in Google Scholar
[24] Duch W, Oentaryo R, Pasquier M.Cognitive architectures: where do we go from here?Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications.2008.Search in Google Scholar
[25] Dobosz K, Duch W. Understanding neurodynamical systems via fuzzy symbolic dynamics. Neural Networks 2010;23:487–96.10.1016/j.neunet.2009.12.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[26] Duch W, Dobosz K. Visualization for understanding of neurodynamical systems. Cognitive Neurodynamics 2011;5:145–60.10.1007/s11571-011-9153-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[27] Mikolajewski D, Duch W. Brain stem modeling at a system level – chances and limitations. Bio-Algorithms Med-Systems 2018;14. DOI: 10.1515/bams-2018-0015.Search in Google Scholar
[28] Kamiński WA. Wójcik GM. Liquid state machine built of Hodgkin-Huxley neurons. Informatica 2004;15:39–44.10.15388/Informatica.2004.044Search in Google Scholar
[29] Wójcik GM, Ważny M. Bray-Curtis Metrics as measure of liquid state machine separation ability in function of connections density. International Conference on Computational Science, ICCS 2015 Computational Science at the Gates of Nature. Procedia Comp Sci 2015;51:2979–83.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
