Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 25, 2016

A Convergent Adaptive Finite Element Method for Cathodic Protection

  • Guanglian Li and Yifeng Xu EMAIL logo

Abstract

In this work, we propose and analyze an adaptive finite element method for a steady-state diffusion equation with a nonlinear boundary condition arising in cathodic protection. Under a general assumption on the marking strategy, we show that the algorithm generates a sequence of discrete solutions that converges strongly to the exact solution in H1(Ω) and the sequence of error estimators has a vanishing limit. Numerical results show clearly the convergence and efficiency of the adaptive algorithm.

Award Identifier / Grant number: 11201307

Award Identifier / Grant number: 20123127120001

Funding statement: The research of the second author was in part supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11201307) and the Ministry of Education of China through Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20123127120001).

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the two referees for their helpful comments and constructive suggestions on the manuscript. The first author would like to thank the Hausdorff Center for Mathematics, University of Bonn, for the generous support, and the Institute for Numerical Simulation, University of Bonn, for the kind host.

References

[1] Ainsworth M. and Oden J. T., A Posteriori Error Estimation in Finite Element Analysis, Pure Appl. Math., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2000. 10.1002/9781118032824Search in Google Scholar

[2] Belenki L., Diening L. and Kreuzer C., Optimality of an adaptive finite element method for the p-Laplacian equation, IMA J. Numer. Anal. 32 (2012), 484–510. 10.1093/imanum/drr016Search in Google Scholar

[3] Brenner S. C. and Scott L. R., The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods, 3rd ed., Texts Appl. Math. 15, Springer, New York, 2008. 10.1007/978-0-387-75934-0Search in Google Scholar

[4] Brezis H. and Lieb E., A relation between pointwise convergence of functions and convergence of functionals, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 88 (1983), 486–490. 10.1007/978-3-642-55925-9_42Search in Google Scholar

[5] Carstensen C., Feischl M., Page M. and Praetorius D., Axioms of adaptivity, Comput. Math. Appl. 67 (2014), 1195–1253. 10.1016/j.camwa.2013.12.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] Ciarlet P. G., Finite Element Methods for Elliptic Problems, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978. 10.1115/1.3424474Search in Google Scholar

[7] Diening L. and Kreuzer C., Linear convergence of an adaptive finite element method for the p-Laplacian equation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 46 (2008), 614–638. 10.1137/070681508Search in Google Scholar

[8] Evans L. E. and Gariepy R. F., Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1992. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Funken S. A., Praetorius D. and Wissgott P., Efficient implementation of adaptive P1-FEM in Matlab, Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 11 (2011), 460–490. 10.2478/cmam-2011-0026Search in Google Scholar

[10] Garau E. M., Morin P. and Zuppa C., Convergence of an adaptive Kačanov FEM for quasi-linear problems, Appl. Numer. Math. 61 (2011), 512–529. 10.1016/j.apnum.2010.12.001Search in Google Scholar

[11] Garau E. M., Morin P. and Zuppa C., Quasi-optimal convergence rate of an AFEM for quasi-linear problems of monotone type, Numer. Math. Theory Methods Appl. 5 (2012), 131–156. 10.4208/nmtma.2012.m1023Search in Google Scholar

[12] Hou L. S. and Sun W., Optimal positioning of anodes for cathodic protection, SIAM J. Control Optim. 34 (1996), 855–873. 10.1137/S0363012993244106Search in Google Scholar

[13] Hou L. S. and Turner J. C., Analysis and finite element approximation of an optimal control problem in electrochemistry with current density controls, Numer. Math. 71 (1995), 289–315. 10.1007/s002110050146Search in Google Scholar

[14] Kossaczky I., A recursive approach to local mesh refinement in two and three dimensions, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 55 (1995), 275–288. 10.1016/0377-0427(94)90034-5Search in Google Scholar

[15] Morin P., Siebert K. G. and Veeser A., A basic convergence result for conforming adaptive finite elements, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 18 (2008), 707–737. 10.1142/S0218202508002838Search in Google Scholar

[16] Nochetto R. H., Siebert K. G. and Veeser A., Theory of adaptive finite element methods: An introduction, Multiscale, Nonlinear and Adaptive Approximation, Springer, New York (2009), 409–542. 10.1007/978-3-642-03413-8_12Search in Google Scholar

[17] Scott L. R. and Zhang S., Finite element interpolation of nonsmooth functions satisfying boundary conditions, Math. Comp. 54 (1990), 483–493. 10.1090/S0025-5718-1990-1011446-7Search in Google Scholar

[18] Siebert K. G., A convergence proof for adaptive finite elements without lower bounds, IMA J. Numer. Anal. 31 (2011), 947–970. 10.1093/imanum/drq001Search in Google Scholar

[19] Stevenson R., The completion of locally refined simplicial partitions created by bisection, Math. Comp. 77 (2008), 227–241. 10.1090/S0025-5718-07-01959-XSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Traxler C., An algorithm for adaptive mesh refinement in n dimensions, Computing 59 (1997), 115–137. 10.1007/BF02684475Search in Google Scholar

[21] Veeser A., Convergent adaptive finite elements for the nonlinear Laplacian, Numer. Math. 92 (2002), 743–770. 10.1007/s002110100377Search in Google Scholar

[22] Verfürth R., A Posteriori Error Estimation Techniques for Finite Element Methods, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679423.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-9-28
Accepted: 2016-9-30
Published Online: 2016-10-25
Published in Print: 2017-1-1

© 2017 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cmam-2016-0032/html
Scroll to top button