Skip to main content
Log in

Supporting flexible regulation of crisis management by means of situated artificial institution

  • Published:
Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper highlights the use of situated artificial institution (SAI) within a hybrid, interactive, normative multi-agent system to regulate human collaboration in crisis management. Norms regulate the actions of human actors based on the dynamics of the environment in which they are situated. This dynamics results from both environment evolution and actors’ actions. Our objective is to situate norms in the environment in order to provide a context-aware crisis regulation. However, this coupling must be a loose one to keep both levels independent and easyto-change in order to face the complex and changing crisis situations. To that aim, we introduce a constitutive level between environmental and normative states providing a loose coupling of normative regulation with environment evolution. Norms are thus no more referring to environmental facts but to status functions, i.e., the institutional interpretation of environmental facts through constitutive rules. We present how this declarative and distinct SAI modelling succeeds in managing the crisis with a context-aware crisis regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldewereld, H., Álvarez-Napagao, S., Dignum, F., et al., 2010. Making norms concrete. Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, p.807–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boella, G., van der Torre, L., Verhagen, H., 2008. Introduction to the special issue on normative multiagent systems. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst., 17(1):1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10458-008-9047-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos, J., López-Sánchez, M., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., et al., 2009. Formalising situatedness and adaptation in electronic institutions. Int. Workshops on Coordination, Organizations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems, p.126–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00443-8_9

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, H.L., Oliveira, E., 2007. Institutional reality and norms: specifying and monitoring agent organizations. Int. J. Cooper. Inform. Syst., 16(1):67–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218843007001573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliffe, O., de Vos, M., Padget, J., 2007. Answer set programming for representing and reasoning about virtual institutions. 7th Int. Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems, p.60–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69619-3_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva dos Santos, I.A., da Rocha Costa, A.C., 2009. Toward a framework for simulating agent-based models of public policy processes on the Jason-CArtAgo platform. Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop on Agent-Based Modeling for Policy Engineering, p.45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dastani, M., van der Torre, L., Yorke-Smith, N., 2013. Monitoring interaction in organisations. Int. Workshops on Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems, p.17–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37756-3_2

    Google Scholar 

  • de Brito, M., Hübner, J.F., Bordini, R.H., 2013. Programming institutional facts in multi-agent systems. 14th Int. Workshop on Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms, p.158–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37756-3_10

    Google Scholar 

  • de Brito, M., Hübner, J.F., Boissier, O., 2014. A conceptual model for situated artificial institutions. 15th Int. Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems, p.35–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09764-0_3

    Google Scholar 

  • de Brito, M., Hübner, J.F., Boissier, O., 2015a. Bringing constitutive dynamics to situated artificial institutions. 17th Portuguese Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, p.624–637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23485-4_63

    Google Scholar 

  • de Brito, M., Thévin, L., Garbay, C., et al., 2015b. Situated artificial institution to support advanced regulation in the field of crisis management. 13th Int. Conf. on Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, p.66–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18944-4_6

    Google Scholar 

  • de Brito, M., Hübner, J.F., Boissier, O., 2016. Coupling regulative and constitutive dimensions in situated artificial institutions. 13th European Conf. on Multi-Agent Systems & 3rd Int. Conf. on Agreement Technologies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33509-4_25

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugdale, J., Bellamine-Ben Saoud, N., Pavard, B., et al., 2010. Simulation and emergency management. In: van de Walle, B., Turoff, M., Hiltz, S.R. (Eds.), Information Systems for Emergency Management. Part IV. Systems Design and Technology, Chapter 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraris, C., Martel, C., 2000. Regulation in groupware: the example of a collaborative drawing tool for young children. 6th Int. Workshop on Groupware, p.119–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CRIWG.2000.885163

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornara, N., Viganò, F., Verdicchio, M., et al., 2008. Artificial institutions: a model of institutional reality for open multiagent systems. Artif. Intell. Law, 16(1):89–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10506-007-9055-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, J., Charoy, F., 2010. Design of a collaborative disaster response process management system. 9th Int. Conf. on the Design of Cooperative Systems, p.57–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbay, C., Badeig, F., Caelen, J., 2012. Normative multiagent approach to support collaborative work in distributed tangible environments, Proc. ACM Conf. on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion, p.83–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2141512.2141548

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossi, D., Aldewereld, H., Vázquez-Salceda, J., et al., 2006. Ontological aspects of the implementation of norms in agent-based electronic institutions. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 12(2):251–275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10588-006-9546-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A.J.I., Sergot, M., 1996. A formal characterisation of institutionalised power. Logic J. IGPL, 4(3):427–443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/4.3.427

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kubicki, S., Lepreux, S., Kolski, C., 2012. RFID-driven situation awareness on Tangisense, a table interacting with tangible objects. Pers. Ubiq. Comput., 16(8):1079–1094. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0442-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, J., Meneguzzi, F., Sycara, K.P., et al., 2011. An agent architecture for prognostic reasoning assistance. Proc. 22nd Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, p.2513–2518. http://dx.doi.org/10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-418

    Google Scholar 

  • Okuyama, F.Y., Bordini, R.H., da Rocha Costa, A.C., 2013. Situated normative infrastructures: the normative object approach. J. Log. Comput., 23(2):397–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exr029

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Oomes, A.H.J., 2004. Organization awareness in crisis management—dynamic organigrams for more effective disaster response. Int. Conf. on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, p.63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagiotidi, S., Álvarez-Napagao, S., Vázquez-Salceda, J., 2013. Towards the norm-aware agent: bridging the gap between deontic specifications and practical mechanisms for norm monitoring and norm-aware planning. Int. Workshops on Coordination, Organizations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems, p.346–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07314-9_19

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipek, V., Liu, S.B., Kerne, A., 2014. Crisis informatics and collaboration: a brief introduction. Comput. Supported Cooper. Work, 23(4):339–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-014-9211-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piunti, M., Boissier, O., Hübner, J.F., et al., 2010. Embodied organizations: a unifying perspective in programming agents, organizations and environments. Proc. Multi-Agent Logics, Languages, and Organisations Federated Workshops, p.98–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci, A., Piunti, M., Viroli, M., 2011. Environment programming in multi-agent systems: an artifact-based perspective. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst., 23(2):158–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10458-010-9140-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S., Norvig, P., 2003. Artificial Intelligence: a Modern Approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J., 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J., 2009. Making the Social World: the Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaer, O., Hornecker, E., 2010. Tangible user interfaces: past, present, and future directions. Found. Trends Human-Comput. Interact., 3(1-2):1–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000026

    Google Scholar 

  • Thévin, L., Badeig, F., Dugdale, J., et al., 2014. Un système multi-agent normatif pour la collaboration et l’interaction mixte. In: Courdier, R., Jamont, J.P. (Eds.), Principe de Parcimonie - JFSMA 14 - Vingtdeuxièmes Journées Francophones sur les Systèmes Multi-Agents, Loriol-sur-Drôme, p.203–212 (in French).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Salceda, J., Aldewereld, H., Dignum, F., 2004. Implementing norms in multiagent systems. 2nd German Conf. on Multiagent System Technologies, p.313–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30082-3_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Viganò, F., Colombetti, M., 2007. Specification and verification of institutions through status functions. Int. Workshops on Coordination, Organizations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems, p.115–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74459-7_8

    Google Scholar 

  • Viganò, F., Colombetti, M., 2008. Model checking norms and sanctions in institutions. Int. Workshops on Coordination, Organizations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems, p.316–329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79003-7_23

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyns, D., Omicini, A., Odell, J., 2007. Environment as a first-class abstraction in multiagent systems. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst., 14(1):5–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10458-006-0012-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • y López, F.L., Luck, M., d’Inverno, M., 2006. A normative framework for agent-based systems. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 12(2-3):227–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10588-006-9545-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S.C., Gu, N., Yang, J.M., 2006. A norm-driven state machine model for CSCW systems. Expert Syst. Appl., 31(4):800–807. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maiquel De Brito.

Additional information

Project supported by CAPES-PDSE (No. 4926145), CNPq (Nos. 448462/2014-1 and 306301/2012-1) and ARC 6 Region Rhône-Alpes (No. ARC-13-009716-01)

A preliminary version was presented at the 13th International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, June 3–4, 2015, Spain

ORCID: Maiquel DE BRITO, http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4650-7416

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Brito, M., Thévin, L., Garbay, C. et al. Supporting flexible regulation of crisis management by means of situated artificial institution. Frontiers Inf Technol Electronic Eng 17, 309–324 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1500369

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1500369

Keywords

CLC number

Navigation