Abstract
Loss of control (LOC) is considered one of the leading causes of fatal aircraft accidents worldwide. Reducing LOC is critical to improve flight safety. Although it is still vaguely defined, LOC is generally associated with a flight state that is outside the safety envelope, with nonlinear influences of aircraft dynamics and incorrect handling by the flight crew. We have studied how nonlinear factors and pilot operations contribute to LOC. In this study, the stall point and bifurcation point are confirmed using the bifurcation analysis, and the results show that the aircraft will stall when excessive elevator movement is commanded. Moreover, even though there may be an equilibrium state in one of the elevator deflections, the flight state may still be outside the flight safety envelope. When the flight state is near the edge of the flight safety envelope, the strategy to regulate the elevator deflection is super-sensitive, and a slight change in the elevator deflection may contribute to a flight state outside the safety envelope. To solve this issue, the differential manifold theory is introduced to determine the safety envelope. Examples are provided using NASA’s generic transport model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bayen AM, Mitchell IM, Oishi MK, et al., 2007. Aircraft autolander safety analysis through optimal control–based reach set computation. J Guid Contr Dynam, 30(1):68–77. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.21562
Chaichi M, García–Río E, Vázquez–Abal ME, 2005. Threedimensional Lorentz manifolds admitting a parallel null vector field. J Phys A Math Gener, 38(4):841–850. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/38/4/005
Chiang HD, Hirsch MW, Wu FF, 1988. Stability regions of nonlinear autonomous dynamical systems. IEEE Trans Autom Contr, 33(1):16–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/9.357
Engelbrecht JAA, Pauck SJ, Peddle IK, 2012. Bifurcation analysis and simulation of stall and spin recovery for large transport aircraft. AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conf, p.1–12. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-4801
Goncharova E, Ovseevich A, 2016. Small–time reachable sets of linear systems with integral control constraints: birth of the shape of a reachable set. J Optim Theory Appl, 168(2): 615–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-015-0754-4
Haghighatnia S, Moghaddam RK, 2013. Enlarging the guaranteed region of attraction in nonlinear systems with bounded parametric uncertainty. J Zhejiang Univ–Sci C (Comput & Electron), 14(3):214–221. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.C1200213
Jahnke C, Culick FEC, 1994. Application of bifurcation theory to the high–angle–of–attack dynamics of the F–14. J Aircraft, 31(1):26–34. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46451
Khatri AK, Sinha NK, 2011. Aircraft maneuver design using bifurcation analysis and nonlinear control techniques. 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, p.1–12. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-924
Khodadadi L, Samadi B, Khaloozadeh H, 2014. Estimation of region of attraction for polynomial nonlinear systems: a numerical method. ISA Trans J Autom, 53(1):25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2013.08.005
Klyde DH, McRuer D, 2009. Smart–cue and smart–gain concepts to alleviate loss of control. J Guid Contr Dynam, 32(5):1409–1417. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.43156
Krauskopf B, Osinga HM, 1999. Two–dimensional global manifolds of vector fields. Chaos Interdiscip J Nonl Sci, 9(3):768–774. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.166450
Krauskopf B, Osinga HM, Doedel EJ, et al., 2005. A survey of methods for computing (un)stable manifolds of vector fields. Int J Bifurc Chaos, 15(3):763–791. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127405012533
Kwatny HG, Dongmo JET, Chang BC, et al., 2013. Nonlinear analysis of aircraft loss of control. J Guid Contr Dynam, 36(1):149–162. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.56948
Lygeros J, Tomlin C, Sastry S, 1999. Controllers for reachability specifications for hybrid systems. Automatica, 35(3):349–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(98)00193-9
Merret JM, Hossain KN, Bragg MB, 2002. Envelope protection and atmospheric disturbances in icing encounters. 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, p.1–18. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2002-814
Osinga HM, 2005. Two–dimensional invariant manifolds in four–dimensional dynamical systems. Comput Graph, 29(2):289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2004.12.016
Pandita R, Chakraborty A, Seiler P, et al., 2009. Reachability and region of attraction analysis applied to GTM dynamic flight envelope assessment. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conf, p.1–21. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-6258
Qi R, Cook D, Kliemann W, et al., 2000. Visualization of stable manifolds and multidimensional surfaces in the analysis of power system dynamics. J Nonl Sci, 10(2): 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003329910008
Ranter H, 2007. Airliner Accident Statistics 2006. Available from https://aviation-safety.net/pubs/asn/ASN_Airliner_Accident_Statistics_2006.pdf [Accessed on Dec. 17, 2018].
Sharma V, Voulgaris PG, Frazzoli E, 2004. Aircraft autopilot analysis and envelope protection for operation under icing conditions. J Guid Contr Dynam, 27(3):454–465. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.1214
Sieber J, Krauskopf B, 2008. Control based bifurcation analysis for experiments. Nonl Dynam, 51(3):365–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-007-9217-2
Weekly K, Tinka A, Anderson L, et al., 2014. Autonomous river navigation using the Hamilton–Jacobi framework for underactuated vehicles. IEEE Trans Robot, 30(5):1250–1255. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2014.2327288
Xin Q, Shi ZK, 2015. Bifurcation analysis and stability design for aircraft longitudinal motion with high angle of attack. Chin J Aeronaut, 28(1):250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2014.12.022
Zhang Y, de Vissery CC, Chu QP, 2016. Online safe flight envelope prediction for damaged aircraft: a databasedriven approach. AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conf, p.1–14. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-1189
Zuo ZQ, Fu YH, Chen YP, et al., 2013. A new method of reachable set estimation for time delay systems with polytopic uncertainties. Appl Math Comput, 221:639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2013.06.099
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Project supported by the National Basic Research Program (973) of China (No. 2015CB755805) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61374145)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, C., Li, Yh., Zheng, Wj. et al. Aircraft safety analysis based on differential manifold theory and bifurcation method. Frontiers Inf Technol Electronic Eng 20, 292–299 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1700435
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1700435