single-jc.php

JACIII Vol.19 No.5 pp. 601-610
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2015.p0601
(2015)

Paper:

Risk Evaluation of Strategic Emerging Industries’ Technical Standards Alliances: The Ecosystem Perspective

Jing Hu and Yueyi Zhang

College of Economics and Management, China Jiliang University
No.258 Xueyuan Street, Xiasha Higher Education District, Hangzhou 310018, China

Received:
September 4, 2014
Accepted:
March 28, 2015
Published:
September 20, 2015
Keywords:
technical standards alliances, strategic emerging industries, risk evaluation, ecosystem
Abstract
This paper conducts a risk assessment of strategic emerging industries’ technical standards alliances. First, we study the ecological properties and operational cycles of technical standards alliances based on the ecological system. Following the rule by which identification precedes assessment, we apply factor analysis to identify the key risk factors in the ecological system of such alliances. We then construct a fuzzy synthetic assessment model and conduct an empirical analysis on the energy saving and environmental protection industries in China. Taking the unique research perspective of the ecological system and using interdisciplinary research methods, this study establishes itself as a theoretical model to be used as a guideline in practice. The result is expected to provide a useful reference for furthering technological innovation in China’s strategic emerging industries.
Cite this article as:
J. Hu and Y. Zhang, “Risk Evaluation of Strategic Emerging Industries’ Technical Standards Alliances: The Ecosystem Perspective,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.19 No.5, pp. 601-610, 2015.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] Y. Zhang and W. Wu, “Research on the Ecology Characteristics of Technical Standard Alliances of Information Industry,” Science & Technology Progress and Policy, Vol.27, No.80, pp. 88-92, 2010.
  2. [2] S. M. Disney and D. R. Towill, “Vendor- managed inventory and bullwhip reduction in a two- level supply chain,” Int. J of Operations & Production Management, Vol.23, No.6, pp. 625- 651, 2003.
  3. [3] J. P. Choi and M. Thum, “Market structure and the timing of technology adoption with network externalities,” European Economic Review, Vol.42, pp. 225-244, 1998.
  4. [4] Y. Dong and K. Xu, “A supply chain model of vendor managed inventory,” Transportation Research Part E, 38, pp. 75-95, 2002.
  5. [5] A. G. Tansley, “The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms,” Ecology, Vol.16, No.3, pp. 284-307, 1935.
  6. [6] R. A. Frosch and N. E. Gallopoulos, “Strategies for Manufacturing,” Scientific American, Vol.261, No.3, pp. 144-152, 1989.
  7. [7] T. Graedel, “Industrial Ecology,” Prentice Hall. New Jersy: Englewood Cliffs, 1995.
  8. [8] M. D. Lowenthal and W. E. Kastenberg, “Industrial Ecology and Energy Systems: Afirst Step,” Resources Conversation and Recycling, Vol.24, pp. 125-129, 1998.
  9. [9] T. E. Graedel and B. R. Allenby, “Industrial ecology,” New York: Prentice Hall, 2003.
  10. [10] J. F. Moore, “The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems,” Harper Business, pp. 297-299, 1998.
  11. [11] Cote and R. J. Hall, “The Industrial Ecology Reader. Halifax,” Nova Scotia: Dalhousie University, School for Resource and Environmental Studies, pp. 66-71, 1995.
  12. [12] J. Korhonen, “Four Ecosystem Principles for an Industrial Ecosystem,” J. of Cleaner Production, Vol.9, No.3, pp. 253-259, 2001.
  13. [13] H. Tang and D. Sun, “Industrial Ecosystems and their Construction,” Environmental Protection Industry, No.2, pp. 14-16, 2003.
  14. [14] L. Qin, “Research on Mechanism and Evaluation of Sustainable Development of Innovation Ecosystem of Hi-tech Enterprises,” Hunan University, College of Business Administration, working paper, March, 2012.
  15. [15] J. F. Moore, “Predators and Prey: A new Ecology of Competition,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.71, No.3, pp. 75-87, 1993.
  16. [16] T. F. Piepenbrock, “Toward a Theory of the Evolution of Business Ecosystems: Inter-Organizational Architectures,” Competitive Dynamics, Firm Performance and Industrial Co-evolution, Vol.7, pp. 112-119, 2010.
  17. [17] R. Lan, “Research on Risk Identification, Assessment and Prevention of Dynamic Alliance,” Beijing Jiaotong University, School of Economics and Management, working paper, November, 2009.
  18. [18] S. Zhao, Y. Li, and H. Jiang, “Research on the Measurement Model of Industrial Innovation System Effect,” J. of Jilin University (Social Sciences), Vol.46, No.5, pp. 131-136, 2006.
  19. [19] Y. Zhang and H. Zheng, “Risk Assessment of High-tech Enterprise Innovation Ecosystem,” Science and Technology Management Research, Vol.7, pp. 7-10, 2009.
  20. [20] H. Yin, X. Sun, and Y. Fu, “Comprehensive Risk Evaluation of Transformation Project of Sci-tech Achievement’s Based on Factor Analysis Method,” Science & Technology Progress and Policy, Vol.26, No.3, pp. 1-6, 2009.
  21. [21] H. Zheng, “Risk Identification of High-tech Enterprise Innovation Ecosystem,” Hunan University, College of Business Administration, working paper, September, 2009.
  22. [22] J. Li, Y. Wang, and S. Peng, “Research on Risk of Chinese Textile Industry Clusters Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method,” Science and Technology Management Research, No.5, pp. 160-162, 2013.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Apr. 18, 2024