Top > JRM > Predictive Dynamics-Based Motion Control for the Rough-Terrain ...

single-rb.php

JRM Vol.23 No.4 pp. 545-556
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2011.p0545
(2011)

Paper:

Views over last 60 days: 589

Predictive Dynamics-Based Motion Control for the Rough-Terrain Locomotion of the Personal Vehicle Falcon-III

Ewerton Ickowzcy*, Takeshi Aoki**, and Shigeo Hirose*

*Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, I1-52, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan

**Department of Advanced Robotics, Chiba Institute of Technology, 2-17-1 Tsudanuma, Narashino-shi, Chiba 275-0016, Japan

Received:
October 11, 2010
Accepted:
December 28, 2010
Published:
August 20, 2011
Creative Commons License
Keywords:
wheeled vehicle, rough terrain, predictive control, ZMP, fuzzy logic
Abstract
A predictive control strategy aiming to reduce the impact generated on a personal vehicle during obstacle negotiation is proposed. Similarly to the motion executed by a cyclist when he/she is about to negotiate a step, the motion strategy uses a dynamic effect to temporarily reduce the load on the wheel of the vehicle that must negotiate the obstacle, thus reducing the impact force as well. Such motion control strategy was developed for the three-wheeled personal vehicle Falcon-III. The vehicle behavior using the predictive control strategy was first investigated for basic cases, such as when only one of the wheels had to negotiate an obstacle; later, the strategy was generalized by combining the motion derived for the basic cases. Robustness is achieved by the use of fuzzy logic to infer the displacement of the ZMP required to negotiate different obstacles. The predictive motion control strategy was compared with a conventional feedback attitude control strategy, and was shown to produce smaller impacts than simply using the feedback strategy.
Cite this article as:
E. Ickowzcy, T. Aoki, and S. Hirose, “Predictive Dynamics-Based Motion Control for the Rough-Terrain Locomotion of the Personal Vehicle Falcon-III,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.23 No.4, pp. 545-556, 2011.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] D. L. Kamen, D. Field, and J. B. Morrel, “Riderless Stabilization of a Balancing Transporter,” U.S. Patent 6,779,621 B2, August 24, 2004.
  2. [2] K. Fujita, “Vehicle and Toy Replica thereof,” U.S. Patent D614,998 S, May 4, 2010.
  3. [3] E. Ickowzcy, T. Aoki, and S. Hirose, “Development of a New Type of Personal Vehicle for Rough-Terrain Applications,” J. of Robotics and Mechatronics, Vol.23, No.1, February 2011.
  4. [4] S. Hirose, T. Sensu, and S. Aoki, “The TAQT Carrier: A Practical Terrain-Adaptive Quadru-Track Carrier Robot,” Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Raleigh, NC, July, 1992.
  5. [5] D.Wettergreen, D. Jonak, D. Kohanbash, S. J. Moreland, S. Spiker, J. Teza, and W. L. Whittaker, “Design and Experimentation of a Rover Concept for Lunar Crater Resource Survey,” 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 2009.
  6. [6] Y. Uchida, K. Furuichi, and S. Hirose, “Fundamental Performance of 6 Wheeled Off-Road Vehicle HELIOS-V,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1999.
  7. [7] S. Nakajima, E. Nakano, and T. Takahashi, “Free Gait Algorithm with Two Returning Legs of a Leg-Wheel Robot,” J. of Robotics and Mechatronics, Vol.20, No.4, pp. 661-668, 2008.
  8. [8] S. Nakajima, “Concept of a novel four-wheel-type mobile robot for rough terrain, RT-Mover,” Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, St. Louis, MO, October, 2009.
  9. [9] K. Hashimoto, Y. Sugahara, H. Lim, and A. Takanishi, “Biped Landing Pattern Modification Method and Walking Experiments in Outdoor Environment,” J. of Robotics and Mechatronics, Vol.20, No.5, pp. 775-784, 2008.
  10. [10] M. Vukobratovic and B. Borovac, “Zero-Moment Point – Thirty Five Years of Its Life,” Int. J. of Humanoid Robotics, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 157-173, 2004.
  11. [11] K. J. Astrom, R. E. Klein, and A. Lennartsson, “Bicycle dynamics and control: adapted bicycles for education and research,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, Vol.25, No.4, pp. 26-47, 2005.
  12. [12] A. Okawa, L. Keo, and M. Yamakita, “Realization of acrobatic turn via wheelie for a bicycle with a balancer,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2965-2970, 2009.
  13. [13] S. Kagami, T. Kitagawa, K. Nishiwaki, T. Sugihara, M. Inaba, and H. Inoue, “A Fast Dynamically Equilibrated Walking Trajectory Generation Method of Humanoid Robot,” Autonomous Robots, Vol.12, pp. 71-82, 2002.
  14. [14] C. C. Lee, “Fuzzy Logic in Control Systems: Fuzzy Logic Controller – Part I,” IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol.20, No.2, pp. 404-418, Mar./Apr. 1990.
  15. [15] K. Demura, “Robot Simulation – Robot programming with Open Dynamics Engine,” Morikita Publishing Co. Ltd., Tokyo, 2007.
  16. [16] C. A. Pickover, “Generating Extraterrestrial Terrain,” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Vol.15, Issue 2, 1995.

Creative Commons License  This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationa License.

Copyright© 2011 by Fuji Technology Press Ltd. and Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers. All right reserved.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Apr. 22, 2024