Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:22:24.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Classes of Ulm type and coding rank-homogeneous trees in other structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

E. Fokina
Affiliation:
Kurt Gödel Research Center for Mathematical Logic, University of Vienna, Währinger Straße 25, 1090 Wien, Austria, E-mail: efokina@logic.univie.ac.at
J. F. Knight
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, 255 Hurley Hall, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556-4618, USA, E-mail: knight.1@nd.edu
A. Melnikov
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, E-mail: a.melnikov@cs.auckland.ac.nz
S. M. Quinn
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Dominican University, 7900 W. Division Street, River Forest, IL 60305, USA, E-mail: squinn@dom.edu
C. Safranski
Affiliation:
St. Vincent College, 300 Fraser Purchase Road, Latrobe, PA 15650, USA, E-mail: christina.safranski@email.stvincent.edu

Abstract

The first main result isolates some conditions which fail for the class of graphs and hold for the class of Abelian p-groups, the class of Abelian torsion groups, and the special class of “rank-homogeneous” trees. We consider these conditions as a possible definition of what it means for a class of structures to have “Ulm type”. The result says that there can be no Turing computable embedding of a class not of Ulm type into one of Ulm type. We apply this result to show that there is no Turing computable embedding of the class of graphs into the class of “rank-homogeneous” trees. The second main result says that there is a Turing computable embedding of the class of rank-homogeneous trees into the class of torsion-free Abelian groups. The third main result says that there is a “rank-preserving” Turing computable embedding of the class of rank-homogeneous trees into the class of Boolean algebras. Using this result, we show that there is a computable Boolean algebra of Scott rank .

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Ash, C. J. and Knight, J. F., Computable structures and the hyperarithmetical hierarchy, Elsevier, 2000.Google Scholar
[2]Barwise, J., Infinitary logic and admissible sets, this Journal, vol. 34 (1969), pp. 226252.Google Scholar
[3]Calvert, W., Cummins, D., Knight, J. F., and Miller, S., Comparing classes of finite structures, Algebra and Logic, vol. 43 (2004), pp. 365373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Calvert, W., Goncharov, S. S., and Knight, J. F., Computable structures of Scott rank in familiar classes, Advances in logic (Gao, , Jackson, , and Zhang, , editors), Contemporary Mathematics, pp. 4366.Google Scholar
[5]Calvert, W., Knight, J. F., and Miliar, J., Computable trees of Scott rank , and computable approximation, this Journal, vol. 71 (2006), pp. 283298.Google Scholar
[6]Camerlo, R. and Gao, S., The completeness of the isomorphism relation for countable Boolean algebras, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 353 (2000), pp. 491518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]D'Aquino, P. and Knight, J. F., Effective embeddings and arithmetic, in preparation.Google Scholar
[8]Downey, R. and Montalbán, A., The isomorphism problem for torsion-free Abelian groups is analytic complete, Journal of Algebra, vol. 320 (2008), no. 6, pp. 22912300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Friedman, H. and Stanley, L., A Borel reducibility theory for classes of countable structures, this Journal, vol. 54 (1989), pp. 894914.Google Scholar
[10]Goncharov, S. S., Harizanov, V. S., Knight, J. F., and Shore, R., relations and paths through , this Journal, vol. 69 (2004), pp. 585611.Google Scholar
[11]Harizanov, V. S., Knight, J. F., Lange, K., McCoy, C., Maher, C., Quinn, S., and Wallbaum, J., Index sets for fields, unpublished notes.Google Scholar
[12]Harrison, J., Recursive pseudo well-orderings, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 131 (1968), pp. 526543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Hirschfeldt, D., Khoussainov, B., Slinko, A., and Shore, R., Degree spectra and computable dimension in algebraic structures, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 115 (2002), pp. 71113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Hjorth, G., The isomorphism relation on countable torsion-free Abelian groups, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 175 (2002), pp. 241257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Hjorth, G. and Thomas, S., The classification problem for p-local torsion-free abelian groups of rank two, Journal of Mathematical Logic, vol. 6 (2006), pp. 233251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Knight, J. F. and Millar, J., Computable structures of rank , Journal of Mathematical Logic, to appear.Google Scholar
[17]Knight, J. F., Quinn, S. Miller, and Boom, M. Vanden, Turing computable embeddings, this Journal, vol. 73 (2007), pp. 901918.Google Scholar
[18]Makkai, M., An example concerning Scott heights, this Journal, vol. 46 (1981), pp. 301318.Google Scholar
[19]Mal'cev, A., On a correspondence between rings and groups, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. Series 2, (1965), pp. 221232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Marker, D., Model theory: An introduction, Springer-Verlag, 2002.Google Scholar
[21]Nadel, M. E., Scott sentences for admissible sets, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 7 (1974), pp. 267294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Nies, A., Undecidable fragments of elementary theories, Algebra Universalis, vol. 35 (1996), pp. 833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Ressayre, J.-P., Models with compactness properties relative to an admissible language, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 11 (1977), pp. 3155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Thomas, S., On the complexity of the classification problem for torsion-free abelian groups offinite rank, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 7 (2001), pp. 329344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Boom, M. Vanden, The effective borel hierarchy, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 195 (2007), pp. 269289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar