Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:37:04.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Embedding first order predicate logic in fragments of intuitionistic logic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

M. H. Löb*
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Extract

Some syntactically simple fragments of intuitionistic logic possess considerable expressive power compared with their classical counterparts.

In particular, we consider in this paper intuitionistic second order propositional logic (ISPL) a formalisation of which may be obtained by adding to the intuitionistic propositional calculus quantifiers binding propositional variables together with the usual quantifier rules and the axiom scheme (Ex), where is a formula not containing x.

The main purpose of this paper is to show that the classical first order predicate calculus with identity can be (isomorphically) embedded in ISPL.

It turns out an immediate consequence of this that the classical first order predicate calculus with identity can also be embedded in the fragment (PLA) of the intuitionistic first order predicate calculus whose only logical symbols are → and (.) (universal quantifier) and the only nonlogical symbol (apart from individual variables and parentheses) a single monadic predicate letter.

Another consequence is that the classical first order predicate calculus can be embedded in the theory of Heyting algebras.

The undecidability of the formal systems under consideration evidently follows immediately from the present results.

We shall indicate how the methods employed may be extended to show also that the intuitionistic first order predicate calculus with identity can be embedded in both ISPL and PLA.

For the purpose of the present paper it will be convenient to use the following formalisation (S) of ISPL based on [3], rather than the one given above.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Prawitz, Dag, Natural deduction, Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm, 1965.Google Scholar
[2]Prawitz, Dag, Some results for intuitionistic logic with second order quantification rules, Intuitionism and proof theory (editors Kino, A., Myhill, J. and Vesley, R. E.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1970, pp. 259270.Google Scholar
[3]Schütte, Kurt, Schlussweisenkalküle der Prädikatenlogik, Mathematische Annalen, vol. 22 (1950), pp. 4765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar