Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T07:10:25.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Model companions and k-model completeness for the complete theories of Boolean algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

J. Mead
Affiliation:
University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242
G. C. Nelson
Affiliation:
University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242

Extract

In studying mathematical logic, Boolean algebras can play an important role in the organization of syntactic properties of first-order theories. In this paper we are concerned with syntactical questions about the complete theories of Boolean algebras, Tarski [12] and Ershov [4]. We give a syntactic characterization of the languages introduced in [4] by Ershov in terms of number of alternations of quantifiers and show that extensions with respect to these natural languages are equivalent to extensions with respect to ∀k(L−1) ⋃ ∃k(L−1) for specified, k. The main motivation for this paper was to examine a generalized notion of model completeness of A. Robinson [14], called k-model completeness, and to find real mathematical structures having these properties in a nontrivial way; this turns out to be realized in the very natural setting of Boolean algebras and our results are very definitive about these notions in that setting. Also, we point out here the connections of these notions with those examined by Chang in [2] and observe that the syntactic properties of the complete theories of Boolean algebras have much in common with those properties enjoyed by ∀n-axiomatizable theories which are categorical for “some” infinite cardinal. Finally, a complete characterization of the model companions of the complete theories of Boolean algebras is given with respect to Ershov's languages [4].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Barwise, J. and Robinson, A., Completing theories by forcing, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 2 (1970), pp. 119142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Chang, C. C., Omitting types of prenex formulas, this Journal, vol. 32 (1967), pp. 6174.Google Scholar
[3]Chang, C. C. and Keisler, H. J., Model theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973.Google Scholar
[4]Ershov, Yu. L., Decidability of the elementary theory of relatively complemented lattices and the theory of filters, Algebra i Logika, vol. 17 (1964), (Russian) pp.1738.Google Scholar
[5]Keisler, H. J., Theory of models with generalized atomic formulas, this Journal, vol. 25 (1961), pp. 126.Google Scholar
[6]Keisler, H. J., Forcing and the omitting types theorem, Studies in model theory (Morley, M. D., Editor), Mathematical Association of America, 1973, pp. 96133.Google Scholar
[7]Mead, J., Prime models and model companions for the theories of Boolean algebras, Ph.D. thesis, University of Iowa, 1975.Google Scholar
[8]Mead, J., Recursive prime models for Boolean algebras, Colloquium Mathematicum (to appear).Google Scholar
[9]Pacholski, L., On countably compact reduced products. III, Colloquium Mathematicum, vol. 23 (1972), pp. 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Shoenfield, J. R., Mathematical logic, Addison-Wesley, London, 1967.Google Scholar
[11]Simmons, H., Existentially closed structures, this Journal, vol. 37 (1972), pp. 293310.Google Scholar
[12]Tarski, A., Arithmetical classes and types of Boolean algebras, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 55 (1949), p. 64, p. 1192.Google Scholar
[13]Tarski, A. and Vaught, R., Arithmetical extensions of relational systems, Compositio Mathematica, vol. 13 (1957), pp. 81102.Google Scholar
[14]Robinson, A., Complete theories, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1956.Google Scholar
[15]Robinson, A., Completeness and persistence in the theory of models, Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, vol. 2 (1956), pp. 1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Waszkiewicz, J., n-theories of Boolean algebras, Colloquium Mathematicum, vol. 30 (1974), pp. 171175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar