Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T00:20:40.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sequential discreteness and clopen-I-Boolean classes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Randall Dougherty
Randall Dougherty*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Kantorovich and Livenson [6] initiated the study of infinitary Boolean operations applied to the subsets of the Baire space and related spaces. It turns out that a number of interesting collections of subsets of the Baire space, such as the collection of Borel sets of a given type (e.g. the Fσ sets) or the collection of analytic sets, can be expressed as the range of an ω-ary Boolean operation applied to all possible ω-sequences of clopen sets. (Such collections are called clopen-ω-Boolean.) More recently, the ranges of I-ary Boolean operations for uncountable I have been considered; specific questions include whether the collection of Borel sets, or the collection of sets at finite levels in the Borel hierarchy, is clopen-I-Boolean.

The main purpose of this paper is to give a characterization of those collections of subsets of the Baire space (or similar spaces) that are clopen-I-Boolean for some I. The Baire space version can be stated as follows: a collection of subsets of the Baire space is clopen-I-Boolean for some I iff it is nonempty and closed downward and σ-directed upward under Wadge reducibility, and in this case we may take I = ω2. The basic method of proof is to use discrete subsets of spaces of the form K2 to put a number of smaller clopen-I-Boolean classes together to form a large one. The final section of the paper gives converse results indicating that, at least in some cases, ω2 cannot be replaced by a smaller index set.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , March 1987 , pp. 232 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Addison, J., Separation principles in the hierarchies of classical and effective descriptive set theory, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 46 (1958), pp. 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Engelking, R. and Karlowicz, M., Some theorems of set theory and their topological consequences, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 57 (1965), pp. 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Hausdorff, F., Set theory, Chelsea, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
[4] Hechler, S., On some weakly compact spaces and their products, General Topology and Its Applications, vol. 5 (1975), pp. 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Jech, T., Set theory, Academic Press, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
[6] Kantorovich, L. and Livenson, E., Memoir on the analytical operations and projective sets. I, II, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 18 (1932), pp. 214–279; vol. 20 (1933), pp. 54–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Kechris, A., Measure and category in effective descriptive set theory, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 5 (1973), pp. 337–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Kuratowski, K., Topology. Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
[9] Miller, A., Some problems in set theory and model theory, Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, California, 1978.Google Scholar
[10] Mycielski, J., On the axiom of determinateness, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 53 (1964), pp. 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Steel, J., Determinateness and subsystems of analysis, Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, California, 1977.Google Scholar
[12] van Wesep, R., Subsystems of second-order arithmetic, and descriptive set theory under the axiom of determinateness, Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, California, 1977.Google Scholar
[13] Wadge, W., Reducibility and determinateness on the Baire space, Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, California, 1983.Google Scholar