Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:51:09.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on nonmultidimensional superstable theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Anand Pillay
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Charles Steinhorn*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
*
Department of Mathematics, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York 12601

Extract

In this paper we prove that if T is the complete elementary diagram of a countable structure and is a theory as in the title, then Vaught's conjecture holds for T. This result is Theorem 7, below. In the process of establishing this proposition, in Theorem 3 we give a sufficient condition for a superstable theory having only countably many types without parameters to be ω-stable. Familiarity with the rudiments of stability theory, as presented in [3] and [4], will be supposed throughout. The notation used is, by now, standard.

We begin by giving a new proof of a lemma due to J. Saffe in [6]. For T stable, recall that the multiplicity of a type p over a set A ⊆ ℳ ⊨ T is the cardinality of the collection of strong types over A extending p.

Lemma 1 (Saffe). Let T be stable, A ⊆ ℳ ⊨ T. If t(b̄, A) has infinite multiplicity and t(c̄, A) has finite multiplicity, then t(b̄, A ∪ {c̄}) has infinite multiplicity.

Proof. We suppose not and work for a contradiction. Let ‹b̄γ:γα›, α ≥ ω, be a list of elements so that t(b̄γ, A) = t(b̄, A) for all γα, and st(b̄γ, A) ≠ st(b̄δ, A) for γδ. Furthermore, let c̄γ satisfy t(b̄γ∧c̄γ, A) = t(b̄ ∧ c̄, A) for each γ < α.

Since t(c̄, A) has finite multiplicity, we may assume for all γ, δ < α. that st(c̄γ, A) = st(c̄δ, A). For each γ < α there is an automorphism fγ of the so-called “monster model” of T (a sufficiently large, saturated model of T) that preserves strong types over A and is such that f(c̄γ) = c̄0.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Baldwin, J., Introduction to stability theory (book in preparation).Google Scholar
[2]Lascar, D., Rank and definability in superstable theories, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 23 (1976), pp. 5387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Makkai, M., A survey of basic stability theory, with particular emphasis on orthogonality and regular types, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 49 (1984), pp. 181238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Pillay, A., Introduction to stability theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1983.Google Scholar
[5]Pillay, A., The models of a nonmultidimensional ω-stable theory, Groupe d'étude: théories stables. III (1980/82), Institut Henri Poincaré, Université Paris VI, Paris, 1983, exposé 10.Google Scholar
[6]Saffe, J., On Vaught's conjecture for superstable theories (to appear).Google Scholar
[7]Shelah, S., Classification theory and the number of non-isomorphic models, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978.Google Scholar
[8]Shelah, S., Harrington, L. and Makkai, M., A proof of Vaught's conjecture for ω-stable theories, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 49 (1984), pp. 259280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar