Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T00:54:37.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The definability of E(α)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

E. R. Griffor
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
D. Normann
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Extract

The question of the limits of recursive enumerability was first formulated by Sacks (1980) and investigated further in Sacks (198?). E-recursion or “set recursion”, as a natural generalization of Kleene recursion in normal objects of finite type, was introduced by Normann (1978) in order to facilitate the study of the degrees of functionals. We shall extend the work of Sacks on the question of how definable is the E-closure of an ordinal α (written E(α)). We write gc(κ) to denote the largest τ < κ such that Lκ ⊨ “τ is a cardinal” and cf (τ) for τ ∈ ON to denote the cofinality of τ.

In §1 we give the basic definitions and state the results of Silver and Friedman (1980) used by Sacks to show that if E(α) = Lκ and is not Σ1-admissible and

then P(gc(κ)) ∩ Lκ is indexical on Lκ and hence RE. We show in this case first that P(gc(κ)) ∩ Lκ indexical implies that Lκ is indexical (and hence RE).

In §2 we introduce the notion of a “nonstandard stage comparison” and use it to extend the definability result of §1 to show that this Lκ is in fact REC. Finally we remark that E(α) is indexical if and only if E(α) is RE.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Friedman, S. D., Negative solutions to Post's problem. II*, M.I.T. Preprint, 1980.Google Scholar
Griffor, E. R. and Normann, D., Effective cofinalities and admissibility in E-recursion, University of Oslo Preprint, 1982.Google Scholar
Kirousis, L., On abstract recursion theory and recursion in the universe of sets, Ph. D. Thesis, U.C.L.A., Los Angeles, California 1978.Google Scholar
Normann, D., Set recursion, Generalized recursion theory. II (Fenstad, J. E., Gandy, R. O. and Sacks, G. E., editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978, pp. 303320.Google Scholar
Sacks, G. E., Post's problem, absoluteness and recursion in finite types, The Kleene symposium (Barwise, J., Kiesler, H. J. and Kunen, K., editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980, pp. 181202.Google Scholar
Sacks, G. E., Limits of recursive enumerability (198?).Google Scholar