Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:08:52.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A normal form theorem for first order formulas and its application to Gaifman's splitting theorem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Nobuyoshi Motohashi*
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan

Extract

Let L be a first order predicate calculus with equality which has a fixed binary predicate symbol <. In this paper, we shall deal with quantifiers Cx, ∀xy, ∃xy defined as follows: CxA(x) is ∀yx(yxA(x)), ∀xyA{x) is ∀x(xyA(x)), and ∃xyA(x) is ∃x(xy4(x)). The expressions x̄, ȳ, … will be used to denote sequences of variables. In particular, x̄ stands for 〈x1, …, xn〉 and ȳ stands for 〈y1,…, ym〉 for some n, m. Also ∃x̄, ∀x̄ ≦ ȳ, … will be used to denote ∃x1 ∃x2 … ∃xn, ∀x1y1x2y2 … ∀xnyn, …, respectively. Let X be a set of formulas in L such that X contains every atomic formula and is closed under substitution of free variables and applications of propositional connectives ¬(not), ∧(and), ∨(or). Then, ∑(X) is the set of formulas of the form ∃x̄B(x̄), where BX, and Φ(X) is the set of formulas of the form

.

Since X is closed under ∧, ∨, the two sets Σ(X) and Φ(X) are closed under ∧, ∨ in the following sense: for any formulas A and B in Σ(X) [Φ(X)], there are formulas in Σ(X)[ Φ(X)] which are obtained from AB and AB by bringing some quantifiers forward in the usual manner.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Gaifman, H., A note on models and submodels of arithmetic, Conference in Mathematical Logic, London '70, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 255, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1972, pp. 128144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Matijasevic, Ju. V., Diophantine representation of enumerable predicates, Mathematics of the USSR—Izvestija, vol. 5 (1971), pp. 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Motohashi, N., Preservation theorem and relativization theorem for cofinal extensions (to appear).Google Scholar
[4]Takeuti, G., Proof theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975.Google Scholar