Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:33:34.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Backwards easton forcing and 0#

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

M. C. Stanley
M. C. Stanley*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, San Jose State University, San Jose, California 95192
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is shown that if κ is an uncountable successor cardinal in L[0#], then there is a normal tree T ϵ L[0#] of height κ such that 0# ∉ L[T], yet T is < κ-distributive in L[0#]. A proper class version of this theorem yields an analogous L[0#]-definable tree such that distinct branches in the presence of 0# collapse the universe. A heretofore unutilized method for constructing in L[0#] generic objects for certain L-definable forcings and “exotic sequences”, combinatorial principles introduced by C. Gray, are used in constructing these trees.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , September 1988 , pp. 809 - 833
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[ASS]Abraham, U., Shelah, S., and Solovay, R., Squares with diamonds and Souslin trees with special squares, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 127 (1986), pp. 133–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[BJW]Beller, A., Jensen, R. B., and Welch, P., Coding the universe, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 47, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[D]Devlin, K., Aspects of constructibility, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 354, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[FMS]Foreman, M., Magidor, M., and Shelah, S., 0# and some forcing principles, this Journal, vol. 51 (1986), pp. 39–46.Google Scholar
[F]Friedman, S., An immune partition of the ordinals, Recursion theory week (Oberwolfach, 1984), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1141, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985, pp. 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[G]Gray, C., Iterated forcing from the strategic point of view, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, California, 1981.Google Scholar
[Jc]Jech, T., Set theory, Academic Press, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
[J]Jensen, R. B.. The fine structure of the constructihle hierarchy, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 4 (1972), pp. 229–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[P]Paris, J., Patterns of indiscernibles, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 6 (1974), pp. 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[V ]Veličković, B., Jensen's □ principles and the Novak number of partially ordered sets, this Journal, vol. 51 (1986), pp. 47–58.Google Scholar