Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:00:38.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some questions concerning the cofinality of Sym(κ)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

James D. Sharp
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903
Simon Thomas*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey
*
Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903

Extract

Suppose that G is a group that is not finitely generated. Then the cofinality of G, written c(G), is denned to be the least cardinal λ such that G can be expressed as the union of a chain of λ proper subgroups. If κ is an infinite cardinal, then Sym(κ) denotes the group of all permutations of the set κ = {αα < κ}. In [1], Macpherson and Neumann proved that c(Sym(κ)) > κ for all infinite cardinals κ. In [4], we proved that it is consistent that c(Sym(ω)) and 2ω can be any two prescribed regular cardinals, subject only to the obvious requirement that c(Sym(ω)) ≤ 2ω. Our first result in this paper is the analogous result for regular uncountable cardinals κ.

Theorem 1.1. Let V ⊨ GCH. Let κ, θ, λ ∈ V be cardinals such that

(i) κ and θ are regular uncountable, and

(ii) κ < θ ≤ cf(λ).

Then there exists a notion of forcing ℙ, which preserves cofinalities and cardinalities, such that if G is ℙ-generic then V[G] ⊨ c(Sym(κ)) = θ ≤ λ = 2κ.

Theorem 1.1 will be proved in §2. Our proof is based on a very powerful uniformization principle, which was shown to be consistent for regular uncountable cardinals in [2].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Macpherson, H. D. and Neumann, P. M., Subgroups of infinite symmetric groups, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, ser. 2, vol. 42 (1990), pp. 6484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Mekler, A. H. and Shelah, S., Uniformizationprinciples, this Journal, vol. 54 (1989), pp. 441459.Google Scholar
[3]Sharp, J. D. and Thomas, S., Unbounded families and the cofinality of the infinite symmetric group, Archive for Mathematical Logic (to appear).Google Scholar
[4]Sharp, J. D. and Thomas, S., Uniformization problems and the cofinality of the infinite symmetric group, preprint, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar