Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:27:48.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Friedberg splittings in Σ30 quotient lattices of

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Todd Hammond*
Affiliation:
Division of Mathematics and Computer Science, Truman State University, Kirksville, MO 63501, USA, E-mail: thammond@truman.edu

Extract

Let {We}e∈ω be a standard enumeration of the recursively enumerable (r.e.) subsets of ω = {0,1,2,…}. The lattice of recursively enumerable sets, , is the structure ({We}e∈ω,∪,∩). ≡ is a congruence relation on if ≡ is an equivalence relation on and if for all U, U′ and V, V′, if UU′ and VV′, then UVU′V′ and UVU′V′. [U] = {V | VU} is the equivalence class of U. If ≡ is a congruence relation on , the elements of the quotient lattice / ≡ are the equivalence classes of ≡. [U] ∪ [V] is defined as [UV], and [U] ∩ [V] is defined as [UV]. We say that a congruence relation ≡ on is if {(i, j)| Wi ≡ Wj} is . Define =* by putting Wi, =* Wj if and only if (Wi − Wj)∪ (Wj − Wi) is finite. Then =* is a congruence relation. If D is any set, then we can define a congruence relation by putting Wi Wj if and only if WiD =* WjD. By Hammond [2], a congruence relation ≡ ⊇ =* is if and only if ≡ is equal to for some set D.

The Friedberg splitting theorem [1] asserts that if A is any recursively enumerable set, then there exist disjoint recursively enumerable sets A0 and A1 such that A = A0A1 and such that for any recursively enumerable set B

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Friedberg, R. M., Three theorems on recursive enumeration: I. Decomposition, II. Maximal set, III. Enumeration without duplication, this Journal, vol. 23 (1958), pp. 309316.Google Scholar
[2]Hammond, T., Congruence relations on lattices of recursively enumerable sets, in preparation.Google Scholar
[3]Morley, M. D. and Soare, R. I., Boolean algebras, splitting theorems and sets, Fundamenta Mathematicae vol. 90 (1975), pp. 4552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Owings, J. C., Recursion, metarecursion, and inclusion, this Journal, vol. 32 (1967), pp. 173178.Google Scholar
[5]Soare, R. I., Recursively enumerable sets and degrees: A study of computable functions and computably generated sets, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar